Evaluation of monte carlo to support commissioning of the treatment planning system of new pencil beam scanning proton therapy facilities

被引:0
|
作者
Botnariuc, D. [1 ,2 ]
Court, S. [3 ]
Lourenco, A. [1 ,2 ]
Gosling, A. [3 ]
Royle, G. [1 ]
Hussein, M. [2 ]
Rompokos, V [3 ]
Veiga, C. [1 ]
机构
[1] UCL, Dept Med Phys & Biomed Engn, Gower St, London WC1E 6BT, England
[2] Metrol Med Phys Ctr, Natl Phys Lab, Hampton Rd, Teddington TW11 0LW, England
[3] Univ Coll London Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, Radiotherapy Phys Serv, 250 Euston Rd, London NW1 2PG, England
来源
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY | 2024年 / 69卷 / 04期
关键词
proton therapy; monte carlo; beam modelling; commissioning; DOSE-CALCULATION; NUCLEAR HALO; SIMULATION; PLATFORM; PERFORMANCE; CHALLENGES; GATE; CODE;
D O I
10.1088/1361-6560/ad1272
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
Objective. To demonstrate the potential of Monte Carlo (MC) to support the resource-intensive measurements that comprise the commissioning of the treatment planning system (TPS) of new proton therapy facilities. Approach. Beam models of a pencil beam scanning system (Varian ProBeam) were developed in GATE (v8.2), Eclipse proton convolution superposition algorithm (v16.1, Varian Medical Systems) and RayStation MC (v12.0.100.0, RaySearch Laboratories), using the beam commissioning data. All models were first benchmarked against the same commissioning data and validated on seven spread-out Bragg peak (SOBP) plans. Then, we explored the use of MC to optimise dose calculation parameters, fully understand the performance and limitations of TPS in homogeneous fields and support the development of patient-specific quality assurance (PSQA) processes. We compared the dose calculations of the TPSs against measurements (DDTPSvs.Meas.) or GATE (DDTPSvs.GATE) for an extensive set of plans of varying complexity. This included homogeneous plans with varying field-size, range, width, and range-shifters (RSs) (n = 46) and PSQA plans for different anatomical sites (n = 11). Main results. The three beam models showed good agreement against the commissioning data, and dose differences of 3.5% and 5% were found for SOBP plans without and with RSs, respectively. DDTPSvs.Meas. and DDTPSvs.GATE were correlated in most scenarios. In homogeneous fields the Pearson's correlation coefficient was 0.92 and 0.68 for Eclipse and RayStation, respectively. The standard deviation of the differences between GATE and measurements (+/- 0.5% for homogeneous and +/- 0.8% for PSQA plans) was applied as tolerance when comparing TPSs with GATE. 72% and 60% of the plans were within the GATE predicted dose difference for both TPSs, for homogeneous and PSQA cases, respectively. Significance. Developing and validating a MC beam model early on into the commissioning of new proton therapy facilities can support the validation of the TPS and facilitate comprehensive investigation of its capabilities and limitations.
引用
收藏
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Experimental Validation of the Monte Carlo Model of HYPERSCAN™ Pencil Beam Scanning System for Proton Beam Imaging and Radiation Treatment
    Huo, W.
    Zwart, T.
    Finley, C.
    Jee, K.
    Sharp, G.
    Rosenthal, S.
    Xu, X.
    Lu, H.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2017, 44 (06) : 2872 - 2872
  • [22] Development and Validation of a TOPAS Monte Carlo Model of a Dynamic Collimation System for Pencil Beam Scanning Proton Therapy
    Nelson, N.
    Culberson, W.
    Hyer, D.
    Geoghegan, T.
    Patwardhan, K.
    Smith, B.
    Flynn, R.
    Yu, J.
    Rana, S.
    Gutierrez, A.
    Hill, P.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2021, 48 (06)
  • [23] Commissioning of Proton Beam Uniform Scanning for a Commercial Treatment Planning System
    Egan, A.
    Maes, D.
    Nevitt, T.
    Leuro, E.
    Fung, A.
    Regmi, R.
    Bloch, C.
    Saini, J.
    Taddei, P.
    Bowen, S.
    Janson, M.
    Wong, T.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2020, 47 (06) : E722 - E722
  • [24] Clinical validation of Monte Carlo dose calculation for pencil beam scanning proton therapy.
    Widesott, L.
    Lorentini, S.
    Fracchiolla, F.
    Farace, P.
    Schwarz, M.
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2018, 127 : S45 - S46
  • [25] Commissioning of pencil beam and Monte Carlo dose engines for non-isocentric treatments in scanned proton beam therapy
    Carlino, A.
    Boehlen, T.
    Vatnitsky, S.
    Grevillot, L.
    Osorio, J.
    Dreindl, R.
    Palmans, H.
    Stock, M.
    Kragl, G.
    [J]. PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2019, 64 (17):
  • [26] Validation and clinical implementation of an accurate Monte Carlo code for pencil beam scanning proton therapy
    Huang, Sheng
    Kang, Minglei
    Souris, Kevin
    Ainsley, Christopher
    Solberg, Timothy D.
    McDonough, James E.
    Simone, Charles B.
    Lin, Liyong
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2018, 19 (05): : 558 - 572
  • [27] A comparison of two pencil beam scanning treatment planning systems for proton therapy
    Langner, Ulrich W.
    Mundis, Michelle
    Strauss, Dan
    Zhu, Mingyao
    Mossahebi, Sina
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2018, 19 (01): : 156 - 163
  • [28] Commissioning of the world's first compact pencil-beam scanning proton therapy system
    Pidikiti, Rajesh
    Patel, Bijal C.
    Maynard, Matthew R.
    Dugas, Joseph P.
    Syh, Joseph
    Sahoo, Narayan
    Wu, Hsinshun Terry
    Rosen, Lane R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2018, 19 (01): : 94 - 105
  • [29] Pitfalls in the beam modelling process of Monte Carlo calculations for proton pencil beam scanning
    Winterhalter, Carla
    Aitkenhead, Adam
    Oxley, David
    Richardson, Jenny
    Weber, Damien C.
    MacKay, Ranald, I
    Lomax, Antony J.
    Safai, Sairos
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2020, 93 (1107):
  • [30] An automated beam commissioning procedure for Monte Carlo treatment planning
    Qin, L
    Li, J
    Jiang, S
    Deng, J
    Ma, C
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2002, 29 (06) : 1232 - 1232