Time to Completion of Two-Step Screening for Gestational Diabetes and Adverse Outcomes

被引:0
|
作者
Nazeer, Sarah A. [1 ]
Chen, Han-Yang [1 ]
Cornthwaite, Joycelyn A. [1 ]
Sadek, Sandra [1 ]
Ghorayeb, Tala [1 ]
Daye, Nahla [1 ]
Chauhan, Suneet P. [1 ]
Sibai, Baha [1 ]
Bartal, Michal F. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas Hlth Sci Ctr Houston, McGovern Med Sch, Dept Obstet Gynecol & Reprod Sci, Div Maternal Fetal Med, 6431 Fannin St,Suite 3-264, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[2] Tel Aviv Univ, Sackler Sch Med, Sheba Med Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Tel Aviv, Israel
关键词
gestational diabetes; screening; glucose tolerance test; large for gestational age; MELLITUS; TRENDS; BIRTH; US;
D O I
10.1055/a-2145-7899
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective This study aimed to ascertain whether the length of time to complete the gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) screening was associated with adverse neonatal outcomes.Study Design This was a retrospective cohort study of singleton, nonanomalous individuals who were screened for GDM at =24 weeks' gestation at an academic hospital system. We compared outcomes among people who were diagnosed with GDM and completed the 3-hour glucose tolerance test (GTT) =14 second versus >14 days from the 1-hour glucose challenge test (GCT). The primary outcome was a composite adverse neonatal outcome of the following: large for gestational age, shoulder dystocia, birth injury, respiratory distress, hypoglycemia, or fetal/neonatal death. The secondary outcomes included several individual neonatal and maternal morbidities. Multivariable Poisson's regression models were used to evaluate the association. Adjusted relative risk (aRR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated.Results Among the 313 individuals who completed the two-step screening for GDM and had an 1-hour GCT = 135?mg/dL; of them, 171 (54.6%) completed the 3-hour GTT =14 days, 142 (45.4%) completed the 3-hour GTT?>?14 days. Overall rate of the primary outcome was 44.1%. After multivariable adjustment, the risk of the primary outcome was similar between people who completed the two-step method in =14 versus >14 days (aRR?=?1.11, 95% CI?=?0.81-1.52). There was no significant difference in all secondary adverse outcomes between the two groups. Subgroup analyses, limited to people diagnosed with GDM (N?=?89, 23.4%), also found similar results as the full analyses.Conclusion Among individuals who completed the two-step screening for GDM, completion of the 3-hour GTT within =14 versus = 14 days was not associated with an increase rate of the adverse outcomes.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:e2679 / e2685
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The effect of gestational age on adverse perinatal outcomes among women with gestational diabetes
    Krashin, Jamie
    Cheng, Yvonne W.
    Snowden, Jon
    Frias, Antonio
    Tran, Susan
    Caughey, Aaron B.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2012, 206 (01) : S255 - S255
  • [42] Prediction of gestational diabetes mellitus in the first trimester; comparion of fasting plasma glucose, two-step and one-step methods
    Yeral, M. Ilkin
    Erdinc, A. Seval Ozgu
    Uygur, Dilek
    Seckin, K. Doga
    Karsli, M. Fatih
    Danisman, A. Nuri
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2013, 208 (01) : S110 - S111
  • [43] Perinatal Outcomes of Two Screening Strategies for Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Rouse, Dwight J.
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2021, 138 (01): : 133 - 133
  • [44] Is time to rethink early screening for gestational diabetes?
    Bianchi, C.
    de Gennaro, G.
    Romano, M.
    Aragona, M.
    Battini, L.
    Del Prato, S.
    Bertolotto, A.
    DIABETOLOGIA, 2017, 60 : S440 - S440
  • [45] Screening for gestational diabetes: the time of day is important
    McElduff, A
    Hitchman, R
    MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA, 2002, 176 (03) : 136 - 136
  • [46] Gestational Diabetes during the Pandemic: Screening Methods and Outcomes in First-time GDM
    Thornton, Jennifer M.
    Dehbi, Hakim-Moulay
    Liney, Thomas
    Shah, Nishel
    Cui, Wei
    Johnson, Mark
    Singh, Natasha
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2022, 129 : 114 - 115
  • [47] A Modified Two-Step Screening Strategy for Gestational Diabetes Mellitus Based on the 2013 WHO Criteria by Combining the Glucose Challenge Test and Clinical Risk Factors
    Benhalima, Katrien
    Van Crombrugge, Paul
    Moyson, Carolien
    Verhaeghe, Johan
    Vandeginste, Sofie
    Verlaenen, Hilde
    Vercammen, Chris
    Maes, Toon
    Dufraimont, Els
    De Block, Christophe
    Jacquemyn, Yves
    Mekahli, Farah
    De Clippel, Katrien
    Van Den Bruel, Annick
    Loccufier, Anne
    Laenen, Annouschka
    Minschart, Caro
    Devlieger, Roland
    Mathieu, Chantal
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2018, 7 (10)
  • [48] The Sensitivity and Specificity of the Glucose Challenge Test in a Universal Two-Step Screening Strategy for Gestational Diabetes Mellitus Using the 2013 World Health Organization Criteria
    Benhalima, Katrien
    Van Crombrugge, Paul
    Moyson, Carolien
    Verhaeghe, Johan
    Vandeginste, Sofie
    Verlaenen, Hilde
    Vercammen, Chris
    Maes, Toon
    Dufraimont, Els
    De Block, Christophe
    Jacquemyn, Yves
    Mekahli, Farah
    De Clippel, Katrien
    Van Den Bruel, Annick
    Loccufier, Anne
    Laenen, Annouschka
    Devlieger, Roland
    Mathieu, Chantal
    DIABETES CARE, 2018, 41 (07) : E111 - E112
  • [49] One step procedure for screening and diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus
    Seshiah, V.
    Balaji, V.
    Balaji, Madhuri S.
    Sekar, Aruna
    Sanjeevi, C. B.
    Green, Anders
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY OF INDIA, 2005, 55 (06): : 525 - 529