Time to Completion of Two-Step Screening for Gestational Diabetes and Adverse Outcomes

被引:0
|
作者
Nazeer, Sarah A. [1 ]
Chen, Han-Yang [1 ]
Cornthwaite, Joycelyn A. [1 ]
Sadek, Sandra [1 ]
Ghorayeb, Tala [1 ]
Daye, Nahla [1 ]
Chauhan, Suneet P. [1 ]
Sibai, Baha [1 ]
Bartal, Michal F. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas Hlth Sci Ctr Houston, McGovern Med Sch, Dept Obstet Gynecol & Reprod Sci, Div Maternal Fetal Med, 6431 Fannin St,Suite 3-264, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[2] Tel Aviv Univ, Sackler Sch Med, Sheba Med Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Tel Aviv, Israel
关键词
gestational diabetes; screening; glucose tolerance test; large for gestational age; MELLITUS; TRENDS; BIRTH; US;
D O I
10.1055/a-2145-7899
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective This study aimed to ascertain whether the length of time to complete the gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) screening was associated with adverse neonatal outcomes.Study Design This was a retrospective cohort study of singleton, nonanomalous individuals who were screened for GDM at =24 weeks' gestation at an academic hospital system. We compared outcomes among people who were diagnosed with GDM and completed the 3-hour glucose tolerance test (GTT) =14 second versus >14 days from the 1-hour glucose challenge test (GCT). The primary outcome was a composite adverse neonatal outcome of the following: large for gestational age, shoulder dystocia, birth injury, respiratory distress, hypoglycemia, or fetal/neonatal death. The secondary outcomes included several individual neonatal and maternal morbidities. Multivariable Poisson's regression models were used to evaluate the association. Adjusted relative risk (aRR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated.Results Among the 313 individuals who completed the two-step screening for GDM and had an 1-hour GCT = 135?mg/dL; of them, 171 (54.6%) completed the 3-hour GTT =14 days, 142 (45.4%) completed the 3-hour GTT?>?14 days. Overall rate of the primary outcome was 44.1%. After multivariable adjustment, the risk of the primary outcome was similar between people who completed the two-step method in =14 versus >14 days (aRR?=?1.11, 95% CI?=?0.81-1.52). There was no significant difference in all secondary adverse outcomes between the two groups. Subgroup analyses, limited to people diagnosed with GDM (N?=?89, 23.4%), also found similar results as the full analyses.Conclusion Among individuals who completed the two-step screening for GDM, completion of the 3-hour GTT within =14 versus = 14 days was not associated with an increase rate of the adverse outcomes.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:e2679 / e2685
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] ADVERSE MATERNAL AND PERINATAL OUTCOMES IN GESTATIONAL DIABETES MELLITUS
    Bhandiwad, Ambarisha
    Divyasree, B.
    Gowda, Surakshith L.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL RESEARCH & HEALTH SCIENCES, 2015, 4 (04): : 775 - 777
  • [32] Two-step islet autoantibody screening for risk assessment of type 1 diabetes in relatives
    Pastore, MR
    Bazzigaluppi, E
    Bonfanti, R
    Dozio, N
    Sergi, A
    Balini, A
    Belloni, C
    Meschi, F
    Bonifacio, E
    Bosi, E
    DIABETES CARE, 1998, 21 (09) : 1445 - 1450
  • [33] Population-Level Outcomes with a 2-Step Approach for Gestational Diabetes Screening and Diagnosis
    Donovan, L. E.
    Edwards, A. L.
    Savu, A.
    Butalia, S.
    Ryan, E. A.
    Johnson, J. A.
    Kaul, P.
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF DIABETES, 2017, 41 (06) : 596 - 602
  • [34] A two-step screening algorithm including fasting plasma glucose measurement and a risk estimation model is an accurate strategy for detecting gestational diabetes mellitus
    Goebl, C. S.
    Bozkurt, L.
    Rivic, P.
    Schernthaner, G.
    Weitgasser, R.
    Pacini, G.
    Mittlboeck, M.
    Bancher-Todesca, D.
    Lechleitner, M.
    Kautzky-Willer, A.
    DIABETOLOGIA, 2012, 55 (12) : 3173 - 3181
  • [35] Prevalence of gestational diabetes and risk of complications before and after initiation of a general systematic two-step screening strategy in Germany (2012-2014)
    Tamayo, T.
    Tamayo, M.
    Rathmann, W.
    Potthoff, P.
    DIABETES RESEARCH AND CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2016, 115 : 1 - 8
  • [36] Does the 1-step method of gestational diabetes mellitus screening improve pregnancy outcomes?
    Ghaffari, Neda
    Gonzalez, Juan M.
    Rosenstein, Melissa G.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY MFM, 2020, 2 (04)
  • [37] A two-step screening algorithm including fasting plasma glucose measurement and a risk estimation model is an accurate strategy for detecting gestational diabetes mellitus
    C. S. Göbl
    L. Bozkurt
    P. Rivic
    G. Schernthaner
    R. Weitgasser
    G. Pacini
    M. Mittlböck
    D. Bancher-Todesca
    M. Lechleitner
    A. Kautzky-Willer
    Diabetologia, 2012, 55 : 3173 - 3181
  • [38] Early A1C vs. Two-Step Method on Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes
    Bodycot, Katherine C.
    Huang, Rachel
    Al-Kouatly, Huda B.
    Mclaren, Rodney
    DIABETES, 2023, 72
  • [39] Utilization of International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups criteria vs. a two-step approach to screening for gestational diabetes mellitus in Chinese women with twin pregnancies
    Liu, X.
    Chen, Y.
    Zhou, Q.
    Shi, H.
    Cheng, W. W.
    DIABETIC MEDICINE, 2015, 32 (03) : 367 - 373
  • [40] Gestational weight gain after the diagnosis of gestational diabetes: association with adverse outcomes
    Harper, Lorie
    Tita, Alan
    Biggio, Joseph
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2014, 210 (01) : S153 - S153