Time to Completion of Two-Step Screening for Gestational Diabetes and Adverse Outcomes

被引:0
|
作者
Nazeer, Sarah A. [1 ]
Chen, Han-Yang [1 ]
Cornthwaite, Joycelyn A. [1 ]
Sadek, Sandra [1 ]
Ghorayeb, Tala [1 ]
Daye, Nahla [1 ]
Chauhan, Suneet P. [1 ]
Sibai, Baha [1 ]
Bartal, Michal F. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas Hlth Sci Ctr Houston, McGovern Med Sch, Dept Obstet Gynecol & Reprod Sci, Div Maternal Fetal Med, 6431 Fannin St,Suite 3-264, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[2] Tel Aviv Univ, Sackler Sch Med, Sheba Med Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Tel Aviv, Israel
关键词
gestational diabetes; screening; glucose tolerance test; large for gestational age; MELLITUS; TRENDS; BIRTH; US;
D O I
10.1055/a-2145-7899
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective This study aimed to ascertain whether the length of time to complete the gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) screening was associated with adverse neonatal outcomes.Study Design This was a retrospective cohort study of singleton, nonanomalous individuals who were screened for GDM at =24 weeks' gestation at an academic hospital system. We compared outcomes among people who were diagnosed with GDM and completed the 3-hour glucose tolerance test (GTT) =14 second versus >14 days from the 1-hour glucose challenge test (GCT). The primary outcome was a composite adverse neonatal outcome of the following: large for gestational age, shoulder dystocia, birth injury, respiratory distress, hypoglycemia, or fetal/neonatal death. The secondary outcomes included several individual neonatal and maternal morbidities. Multivariable Poisson's regression models were used to evaluate the association. Adjusted relative risk (aRR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated.Results Among the 313 individuals who completed the two-step screening for GDM and had an 1-hour GCT = 135?mg/dL; of them, 171 (54.6%) completed the 3-hour GTT =14 days, 142 (45.4%) completed the 3-hour GTT?>?14 days. Overall rate of the primary outcome was 44.1%. After multivariable adjustment, the risk of the primary outcome was similar between people who completed the two-step method in =14 versus >14 days (aRR?=?1.11, 95% CI?=?0.81-1.52). There was no significant difference in all secondary adverse outcomes between the two groups. Subgroup analyses, limited to people diagnosed with GDM (N?=?89, 23.4%), also found similar results as the full analyses.Conclusion Among individuals who completed the two-step screening for GDM, completion of the 3-hour GTT within =14 versus = 14 days was not associated with an increase rate of the adverse outcomes.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:e2679 / e2685
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Obstetrics One- and two-step Screening for Gestational Diabetes
    Metzger, Leandra
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR GEBURTSHILFE UND NEONATOLOGIE, 2021, 225 (04): : 295 - +
  • [2] Are women positive for the One Step but negative for the Two Step screening tests for gestational diabetes at higher risk for adverse outcomes?
    Caissutti, Claudia
    Khalifeh, Adeeb
    Saccone, Gabriele
    Berghella, Vincenzo
    ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2018, 97 (02) : 122 - 134
  • [3] One-step vs two-step screening for gestational diabetes: a randomized controlled trial
    Khalifeh, Adeeb
    Eckler, Rebecca
    Felder, Laura
    Saccone, Gabriele
    Khosla, Jayasree
    Berghella, Vincenzo
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2018, 218 (01) : S29 - S30
  • [4] One-Step Compared With Two-Step Gestational Diabetes Screening and Pregnancy Outcomes A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Brady, Matthew
    Hensel, Drew M.
    Paul, Rachel
    Doering, Michelle M.
    Kelly, Jeannie C.
    Frolova, Antonina, I
    Odibo, Anthony O.
    Barry, Valene Garr
    Powe, Camille E.
    Raghuraman, Nandini
    Tuuli, Methodius G.
    Carter, Ebony B.
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2022, 140 (05): : 712 - 723
  • [5] Gestational diabetes screening: do neonatal outcomes differ based on one-step or two-step methods in a high risk population?
    Fuller, Kisti
    Borgida, Adam
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2013, 208 (01) : S124 - S125
  • [6] Cost-Effectivity Analysis of One-Step Versus Two-Step Screening for Gestational Diabetes
    Celen, Sevki
    Yildiz, Yasemin
    Kahyaoglu, Serkan
    Kaymak, Oktay
    Ozel, Murat
    Timur, Hakan
    Danisman, Nuri
    EURASIAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2012, 44 (02): : 84 - 87
  • [7] Efficacy of a two-step screening strategy for gestational diabetes in an area with a low prevalence of gestational diabetes and impact of the new IADPSG recommendation
    Benhalima, K.
    Hanssens, M.
    Devlieger, R.
    Van Crombrugge, P.
    Verhaeghe, J.
    Mathieu, C.
    DIABETOLOGIA, 2011, 54 : S473 - S473
  • [8] Systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnosing gestational diabetes mellitus with one-step or two-step approaches and associations with adverse pregnancy outcomes
    Hosseini, Elham
    Janghorbani, Mohsen
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2018, 143 (02) : 137 - 144
  • [9] Missed follow-up opportunities using a two-step screening approach for gestational diabetes
    Sievenpiper, John L.
    McDonald, Sarah D.
    Grey, Vijaylaxmi
    Don-Wauchope, Andrew C.
    DIABETES RESEARCH AND CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2012, 96 (02) : E43 - E46
  • [10] Universal two-step screening strategy for gestational diabetes has weak relevance in French Mediterranean women: Should we simplify the screening strategy for gestational diabetes in France?
    Chevalier, N.
    Fenichel, P.
    Giaume, V.
    Loizeau, S.
    Bongain, A.
    Daideri, G.
    Brucker-Davis, F.
    Hieronimus, S.
    DIABETES & METABOLISM, 2011, 37 (05) : 419 - 425