Insights into computational thinking from think-aloud interviews: A systematic review

被引:0
|
作者
Pan, Zexuan [1 ]
Cui, Ying [1 ]
Leighton, Jacqueline P. [1 ]
Cutumisu, Maria [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Alberta, Fac Educ, Ctr Res Appl Measurement & Evaluat, Dept Educ Psychol, Edmonton, AB, Canada
[2] Univ Alberta, Fac Educ, Dept Educ Psychol, 6-102 Educ North, Edmonton, AB T6G 2G5, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
cognitive processes; computational thinking; think-aloud; VERBAL REPORTS; SKILLS; GAME; EDUCATION; TEACHERS; LEARN;
D O I
10.1002/acp.4029
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
This systematic review examines 35 empirical studies featuring the use of think-aloud interviews in computational thinking (CT) research. Findings show that think-aloud interviews (1) are typically conducted in Computer Science classrooms and with K-12 students; (2) are usually combined with other exploratory CT assessment tools; (3) have the potential to benefit learners with special needs and identify the competency gaps through involving diverse participants; (4) are conducted in the absence of cognitive models and standard procedures; and (5) display insufficient definitional and methodological rigor. Theoretically, this review presents a systematic assessment about the application of think-aloud interviews in CT studies and identifies the limitations in existing CT-related think-aloud studies. Practically, this review serves as a reference for studying the cognitive processes during CT problem-solving and provides suggestions for CT researchers who intend to incorporate think-aloud interviews in their studies.
引用
收藏
页码:71 / 95
页数:25
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Rethinking Thinking Aloud: A Comparison of Three Think-Aloud Protocols
    Alhadreti, Obead
    Mayhew, Pam
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2018 CHI CONFERENCE ON HUMAN FACTORS IN COMPUTING SYSTEMS (CHI 2018), 2018,
  • [2] The spatial thinking of origami: evidence from think-aloud protocols
    Holly A. Taylor
    Thora Tenbrink
    [J]. Cognitive Processing, 2013, 14 : 189 - 191
  • [3] The spatial thinking of origami: evidence from think-aloud protocols
    Taylor, Holly A.
    Tenbrink, Thora
    [J]. COGNITIVE PROCESSING, 2013, 14 (02) : 189 - 191
  • [4] Unearthing the Creative Thinking Process: Fresh Insights From a Think-Aloud Study of Garden Design
    Pringle, Andrew
    Sowden, Paul T.
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGY OF AESTHETICS CREATIVITY AND THE ARTS, 2017, 11 (03) : 344 - 358
  • [5] A comparison of think-aloud, questionnaires and interviews for testing usability with children
    Donker, A
    Markopoulos, P
    [J]. PEOPLE AND COMPUTERS XVI- MEMORABLE YET INVISIBLE, PROCEEDINGS, 2002, : 305 - 316
  • [6] Digital Module 12: Think-aloud Interviews and Cognitive Labs
    Leighton, Jacqueline P.
    Lehman, Blair
    [J]. EDUCATIONAL MEASUREMENT-ISSUES AND PRACTICE, 2020, 39 (01) : 96 - 97
  • [7] Using Think-Aloud Interviews and Cognitive Labs in Educational Research
    Kinskey, Melanie
    [J]. QUALITATIVE REPORT, 2018, 23 (03) : 730 - 732
  • [8] Collecting Validity Evidence for an Assessment of Professionalism: Findings from Think-Aloud Interviews
    Mazor, Kathleen M.
    Canavan, Colleen
    Farrell, Margaret
    Margolis, Melissa J.
    Clauser, Brian E.
    [J]. ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 2008, 83 (10) : S9 - S12
  • [9] Think-Aloud Interviews: A Tool for Exploring Student Statistical Reasoning
    Reinhart, Alex
    Evans, Ciaran
    Luby, Amanda
    Orellana, Josue
    Meyer, Mikaela
    Wieczorek, Jerzy
    Elliott, Peter
    Burckhardt, Philipp
    Nugent, Rebecca
    [J]. JOURNAL OF STATISTICS AND DATA SCIENCE EDUCATION, 2022, 30 (02): : 100 - 113
  • [10] Making Models of Measurement Tools: Examples from Think-Aloud Student Interviews
    Zwickl, Benjamin M.
    Hu, Dehui
    Finkelstein, Noah
    Lewandowski, H. J.
    [J]. 2014 PHYSICS EDUCATION RESEARCH CONFERENCE, 2014, : 291 - 294