Insights into computational thinking from think-aloud interviews: A systematic review

被引:0
|
作者
Pan, Zexuan [1 ]
Cui, Ying [1 ]
Leighton, Jacqueline P. [1 ]
Cutumisu, Maria [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Alberta, Fac Educ, Ctr Res Appl Measurement & Evaluat, Dept Educ Psychol, Edmonton, AB, Canada
[2] Univ Alberta, Fac Educ, Dept Educ Psychol, 6-102 Educ North, Edmonton, AB T6G 2G5, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
cognitive processes; computational thinking; think-aloud; VERBAL REPORTS; SKILLS; GAME; EDUCATION; TEACHERS; LEARN;
D O I
10.1002/acp.4029
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
This systematic review examines 35 empirical studies featuring the use of think-aloud interviews in computational thinking (CT) research. Findings show that think-aloud interviews (1) are typically conducted in Computer Science classrooms and with K-12 students; (2) are usually combined with other exploratory CT assessment tools; (3) have the potential to benefit learners with special needs and identify the competency gaps through involving diverse participants; (4) are conducted in the absence of cognitive models and standard procedures; and (5) display insufficient definitional and methodological rigor. Theoretically, this review presents a systematic assessment about the application of think-aloud interviews in CT studies and identifies the limitations in existing CT-related think-aloud studies. Practically, this review serves as a reference for studying the cognitive processes during CT problem-solving and provides suggestions for CT researchers who intend to incorporate think-aloud interviews in their studies.
引用
收藏
页码:71 / 95
页数:25
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Understanding the Preferences and Considerations of the Public Towards Risk-Stratified Screening for Colorectal Cancer: Insights From Think-Aloud Interviews Based on a Discrete Choice Experiment
    Dennison, Rebecca A.
    Clune, Reanna J.
    Morris, Stephen
    Thomas, Chloe
    Usher-Smith, Juliet A.
    HEALTH EXPECTATIONS, 2024, 27 (04)
  • [32] Using think-aloud interviews to characterize model-based reasoning in electronics for a laboratory course assessment
    Rios, Laura
    Pollard, Benjamin
    Dounas-Frazer, Dimitri R.
    Lewandowski, H. J.
    PHYSICAL REVIEW PHYSICS EDUCATION RESEARCH, 2019, 15 (01):
  • [33] THINK-ALOUD INTERVIEWS IN HEALTH-RELATED RESOURCE-USE RESEARCH: APPLICATION IN THE PECUNIA PROJECT
    Janssen, L.
    Pokhilenko, I
    Drost, R.
    Paulus, A. T. G.
    Thorn, J.
    Hollingworth, W.
    Noble, S.
    Simon, J.
    Mayer, S.
    Berger, M.
    Evers, S.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2021, 24 : S134 - S134
  • [34] Identifying SQL Misconceptions of Novices: Findings from a Think-Aloud Study
    Miedema, Daphne
    Aivaloglou, Efthimia
    Fletcher, George
    ICER 2021: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 17TH ACM CONFERENCE ON INTERNATIONAL COMPUTING EDUCATION RESEARCH, 2021, : 355 - 367
  • [35] Identifying SQL Misconceptions of Novices: Findings from a Think-Aloud Study
    Miedema D.
    Aivaloglou E.
    Fletcher G.
    ACM Inroads, 2022, 13 (01) : 52 - 65
  • [36] Direct from the source: the value of 'think-aloud' data in understanding learning
    Young, Kirsty A.
    JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL ENQUIRY, 2005, 6 (01): : 19 - 33
  • [37] Thinking in Clinical Nursing Practice: A Study of Critical Care Nurses' Thinking Applying the Think-Aloud, Protocol Analysis Method
    Han, Kyung-Ja
    Kim, Hesook Suzie
    Kim, Mae-Ja
    Hong, Kyung-Ja
    Park, Sungae
    Yun, Soon-Nyoung
    Song, Misoon
    Jung, Yoenyi
    Kim, Haewon
    Kim, Dong-Oak Debbie
    Choi, Heejung
    Kim, Kyungae
    ASIAN NURSING RESEARCH, 2007, 1 (01) : 68 - 82
  • [38] Methods for think-aloud interviews in health-related resource-use research: the PECUNIA RUM instrument
    Janssen, L. M. M.
    Pokhilenko, I.
    Drost, R. M. W. A.
    Paulus, A. T. G.
    Thorn, J.
    Hollingworth, W.
    Noble, S.
    Berger, M.
    Simon, J.
    Evers, S. M. A. A.
    PECUNIA Grp
    EXPERT REVIEW OF PHARMACOECONOMICS & OUTCOMES RESEARCH, 2023, 23 (04) : 383 - 389
  • [39] Situational judgment test validity: an exploratory model of the participant response process using cognitive and think-aloud interviews
    Michael D. Wolcott
    Nikki G. Lobczowski
    Jacqueline M. Zeeman
    Jacqueline E. McLaughlin
    BMC Medical Education, 20
  • [40] Situational judgment test validity: an exploratory model of the participant response process using cognitive and think-aloud interviews
    Wolcott, Michael D.
    Lobczowski, Nikki G.
    Zeeman, Jacqueline M.
    McLaughlin, Jacqueline E.
    BMC MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2020, 20 (01)