The evolution of corporate social responsibility in China: Do political connection and ownership matter?

被引:3
|
作者
Tee, Kienpin [1 ]
Chen, Xihui Haviour [2 ]
Hooy, Chee-Wooi [3 ]
机构
[1] James Cook Univ, 149 Sims Dr, Singapore 387380, Singapore
[2] Keele Univ, Keele Business Sch, Keele ST5 5BG, Staffs, England
[3] Univ Sains Malaysia, Sch Management, George Town 11800, Malaysia
关键词
Corporate social responsibility; Political connection; Firm ownership; Political cost theory; China; Jinping xi; PERFORMANCE; CSR; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.gfj.2024.100941
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
The rising CSR awareness globally has influence CSR development in China but unlike anywhere in the world, the central government is always the main driver of CSR here, making it a unique case study. Under this political state, this study examines how a firm's political connections and foreign ownership affects its CSR reporting. We study a long sample over 4 different stages of CSR development in China between 2006 and 2019 with panel regression analysis. Our results show that CSR reporting and participation have increased over the sample period, but firms with political connection and foreign ownership are associated with lower levels of CSR reporting. The findings contradict theories of political cost theory that fit well in other countries. We propose crony relationship to explain the phenomena of low CSR compliance in the political linked firms in China. We further study Xi Jinping (XJP) regime and find that CSR reporting in China improved significantly in this regime but XJP regime moderates the state and foreign owned firms differently. Under XJP government, crony relationship has reduced following improved CSR reporting in politically connected firms, but CSR score has declined in foreign owned firms, implying they have become more opportunistic in cutting business cost and seeking profit.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Does corporate integrity culture matter to corporate social responsibility? Evidence from China
    Wan, Peng
    Chen, Xiangyu
    Ke, Yun
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2020, 259
  • [42] Corporate political connection and corporate social responsibility disclosures: A neo-pluralist hypothesis and empirical evidence
    Muttakin, Mohammad Badrul
    Mihret, Dessalegn Getie
    Khan, Arifur
    [J]. ACCOUNTING AUDITING & ACCOUNTABILITY JOURNAL, 2018, 31 (02): : 725 - 744
  • [43] Corporate political activity and bribery in Africa: Do internet penetration and foreign ownership matter?
    Liedong, Tahiru Azaaviele
    Aghanya, Daniel
    Jimenez, Alfredo
    Rajwani, Tazeeb
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2023, 154
  • [44] Does privatization matter for corporate social responsibility? Evidence from China
    Farman Ullah Khan
    Junrui Zhang
    Nanyan Dong
    Muhammad Usman
    Sajid Ullah
    Shahid Ali
    [J]. Eurasian Business Review, 2021, 11 : 497 - 515
  • [45] Political Uncertainty and Corporate Social Responsibility
    Cheng, Maoyong
    Dong, Yuxuan
    Jin, Justin Y.
    Kanagaretnam, Kiridaran
    [J]. ASIA-PACIFIC JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL STUDIES, 2022,
  • [46] Does privatization matter for corporate social responsibility? Evidence from China
    Khan, Farman Ullah
    Zhang, Junrui
    Dong, Nanyan
    Usman, Muhammad
    Ullah, Sajid
    Ali, Shahid
    [J]. EURASIAN BUSINESS REVIEW, 2021, 11 (03) : 497 - 515
  • [47] Political sentiment and corporate social responsibility
    Hasan, Mostafa Monzur
    Jiang, Haiyan
    [J]. BRITISH ACCOUNTING REVIEW, 2023, 55 (01):
  • [48] The Political Roots of Corporate Social Responsibility
    Detomasi, David Antony
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2008, 82 (04) : 807 - 819
  • [49] Forget political corporate social responsibility
    Rhodes, Carl
    Fleming, Peter
    [J]. ORGANIZATION, 2020, 27 (06) : 943 - 951
  • [50] Pluralism in Political Corporate Social Responsibility
    Maekinen, Jukka
    Kourula, Arno
    [J]. BUSINESS ETHICS QUARTERLY, 2012, 22 (04) : 649 - 678