Does corporate integrity culture matter to corporate social responsibility? Evidence from China

被引:45
|
作者
Wan, Peng [1 ]
Chen, Xiangyu [2 ,4 ]
Ke, Yun [3 ]
机构
[1] Zhejiang Gongshang Univ, Sch Accounting, Hangzhou 310018, Peoples R China
[2] Zhejiang Univ Finance & Econ, Sch Accounting, Hangzhou 310018, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Texas El Paso, Coll Business Adm, El Paso, TX 79968 USA
[4] 18 Xueyuan St, Hangzhou 310018, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Corporate culture; Integrity; Corporate social responsibility (CSR); China; ANALYST COVERAGE; CSR DISCLOSURES; PERFORMANCE; GOVERNANCE; DIRECTORS; BOARD; ORGANIZATION; INVESTMENT; REPUTATION; OWNERSHIP;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120877
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The purpose of this paper is to examine whether firms' embrace of an integrity culture will affect the performance of corporate social responsibility (CSR). Employing manually collected data on corporate culture and 5,149 firm-year observations in China from 2008 to 2016, our empirical study finds that corporate integrity culture has a strong positive effect on CSR performance, suggesting that an integrity-oriented corporate culture helps companies to bear CSR on their own initiative. We further find CEO duality leadership strengthens and analyst coverage attenuates the above relationship. This article is the first to explore the effect of corporate integrity culture on CSR behavior and validates the role of corporate culture as a crucial informal institution in guiding companies to uphold CSR. The empirical results also confirm the role of corporate culture in enhancing the social value of corporations. Our paper is helpful to broaden our understanding of the factors influencing CSR and provides a possible solution to the problem of CSR fulfillment. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Does corporate social responsibility matter for corporate stability? Evidence from China
    Yujing Gong
    Kung-Cheng Ho
    [J]. Quality & Quantity, 2018, 52 : 2291 - 2319
  • [2] Does corporate social responsibility matter for corporate stability? Evidence from China
    Gong, Yujing
    Ho, Kung-Cheng
    [J]. QUALITY & QUANTITY, 2018, 52 (05) : 2291 - 2319
  • [3] Does privatization matter for corporate social responsibility? Evidence from China
    Khan, Farman Ullah
    Zhang, Junrui
    Dong, Nanyan
    Usman, Muhammad
    Ullah, Sajid
    Ali, Shahid
    [J]. EURASIAN BUSINESS REVIEW, 2021, 11 (03) : 497 - 515
  • [4] Does privatization matter for corporate social responsibility? Evidence from China
    Farman Ullah Khan
    Junrui Zhang
    Nanyan Dong
    Muhammad Usman
    Sajid Ullah
    Shahid Ali
    [J]. Eurasian Business Review, 2021, 11 : 497 - 515
  • [5] Does corporate internationalization affect corporate social responsibility? Evidence from China
    Zhang, Guiling
    Wang, Linjiang
    Guo, Fei
    Yang, Guochao
    [J]. EMERGING MARKETS REVIEW, 2021, 46
  • [6] Does corporate social responsibility matter to management forecast precision? Evidence from China
    Chen, Xiangyu
    Wan, Peng
    Quan, Xiaofeng
    Sial, Muhammad Safdar
    [J]. ECONOMIC RESEARCH-EKONOMSKA ISTRAZIVANJA, 2020, 33 (01): : 1767 - 1795
  • [7] Awe culture and corporate social responsibility: Evidence from China
    Yan, Chao
    Wang, Jiaxin
    Wang, Zhi
    Chan, Kam C. C.
    [J]. ACCOUNTING AND FINANCE, 2023, 63 (03): : 3487 - 3517
  • [8] Corruption culture and corporate social responsibility: evidence from China
    Wu, Jiamei
    Chen, Zhibin
    [J]. ASIA-PACIFIC JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING & ECONOMICS, 2023, 30 (05) : 1286 - 1304
  • [9] Corporate Social Responsibility and Corporate Governance: Evidence from China
    Liu Jihan
    Wang Jianqiong
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 9TH EURO-ASIA CONFERENCE ON ENVIRONMENT AND CSR: TOURISM, SOCIETY AND EDUCATION SESSION (PT I), 2013, : 185 - 192
  • [10] Does the nature of political connection matter for corporate social responsibility engagement? Evidence from China
    Dang, Vinh Q. T.
    Otchere, Isaac
    So, Erin P. K.
    [J]. EMERGING MARKETS REVIEW, 2022, 52