Health providers' reasons for participating in abortion care: A scoping review

被引:1
|
作者
Merner, Bronwen [1 ]
Haining, Casey M. [1 ]
Willmott, Lindy [2 ]
Savulescu, Julian [3 ,4 ,5 ,6 ]
Keogh, Louise A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Melbourne, Melbourne Sch Populat & Global Hlth, Parkville, Vic 3010, Australia
[2] Queensland Univ Technol, Fac Business & Law, Australian Ctr Hlth Law Res, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[3] Univ Oxford, Oxford Uehiro Ctr Pract Eth, Oxford, England
[4] Natl Univ Singapore, Ctr Biomed Eth, Yong Loo Lin Sch Med, Singapore, Singapore
[5] Murdoch Childrens Res Inst, Parkville, Vic, Australia
[6] Univ Melbourne, Parkville, Vic, Australia
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
abortion; conscientious objection; midwives; nurses; obstetrics and gynaecology; physicians; termination of pregnancy; CONSCIENTIOUS OBJECTION; NURSES; TERMINATION; PREGNANCY; EXPERIENCES; PROVISION; MIDWIVES; ATTITUDES; SERVICES; BELIEFS;
D O I
10.1177/17455057241233124
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Background: There is a global shortage of health providers in abortion care. Public discourse presents abortion providers as dangerous and greedy and links 'conscience' with refusal to participate. This may discourage provision. A scoping review of empirical evidence is needed to inform public perceptions of the reasons that health providers participate in abortion.Objective: The study aimed to identify what is known about health providers' reasons for participating in abortion provision.Eligibility criteria: Studies were eligible if they included health providers' reasons for participating in legal abortion provision. Only empirical studies were eligible for inclusion.Sources of evidence: We searched the following databases from January 2000 until January 2022: Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online, Excerpta Medica Database, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, ScienceDirect and Centre for Agricultural and Biosciences International Abstracts. Grey literature was also searched.Methods: Dual screening was conducted of both title/abstract and full-text articles. Health providers' reasons for provision were extracted and grouped into preliminary categories based on the existing research. These categories were revised by all authors until they sufficiently reflected the extracted data.Results: From 3251 records retrieved, 68 studies were included. In descending order, reasons for participating in abortion were as follows: supporting women's choices and advocating for women's rights (76%); being professionally committed to participating in abortion (50%); aligning with personal, religious or moral values (39%); finding provision satisfying and important (33%); being influenced by workplace exposure or support (19%); responding to the community needs for abortion services (14%) and participating for practical and lifestyle reasons (8%).Conclusion: Abortion providers participated in abortion for a range of reasons. Reasons were mainly focused on supporting women's choices and rights; providing professional health care; and providing services that aligned with the provider's own personal, religious or moral values. The findings provided no evidence to support negative portrayals of abortion providers present in public discourse. Like conscientious objectors, abortion providers can also be motivated by conscience.
引用
收藏
页数:25
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Availability and acceptability of medical abortion in Nepal: Health care providers' perspectives
    Tamang, A
    Tamang, J
    [J]. REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH MATTERS, 2005, 13 (26) : 110 - 119
  • [42] Allied Health Care Providers Participating in Medical Assistance in Dying Perceptions of Support
    Mills, Anneliese
    Wortzman, Rachel
    Bean, Sally
    Selby, Debbie
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HOSPICE & PALLIATIVE NURSING, 2020, 22 (03) : 220 - 228
  • [43] Attitudes and intentions of future health care providers toward abortion provision
    Shotorbani, S
    Zimmerman, FJ
    Bell, JF
    Ward, D
    Assefi, N
    [J]. PERSPECTIVES ON SEXUAL AND REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH, 2004, 36 (02) : 58 - 63
  • [44] Palliative care in primary health care: scoping review
    Justino, Eveline Tremea
    Kasper, Maristel
    Santos, Karen da Silva
    Quaglio, Rita de Cassia
    Fortuna, Cinira Magali
    [J]. REVISTA LATINO-AMERICANA DE ENFERMAGEM, 2020, 28 : 1 - 11
  • [45] What is 'physiological birth'? A scoping review of the perspectives of women and care providers
    Henshall, Brooke I.
    Grimes, Heather A.
    Davis, Jennifer
    East, Christine E.
    [J]. MIDWIFERY, 2024, 132
  • [46] The impact of severe perinatal events on maternity care providers: a scoping review
    Nieuwenhuijze, Marianne
    Leahy-Warren, Patricia
    Healy, Maria
    Aktas, Songuel
    Aydin, Ruveyde
    Calleja-Agius, Jean
    Goberna-Tricas, Josefina
    Hadjigeorgiou, Eleni
    Hartmann, Katharina
    Henriksen, Lena
    Horsch, Antje
    Lange, Ute
    Murphy, Margaret
    Pierron, Annabelle
    Schaefers, Rainhild
    Pajalic, Zada
    Verhoeven, Corine
    Berdun, Dolores Ruiz
    Hossain, Sheima
    [J]. BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2024, 24 (01)
  • [47] Skin Cancer Education Interventions for Primary Care Providers: A Scoping Review
    Brown, Ashley E.
    Najmi, Maleka
    Duke, Taylor
    Grabell, Daniel A.
    Koshelev, Misha, V
    Nelson, Kelly C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2022, 37 (09) : 2267 - 2279
  • [48] Exploring the experience of providing abortion care: a mixed methods scoping review
    Dempsey, B.
    Callaghan, S.
    Higgins, M.
    [J]. BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2021, 128 : 277 - 278
  • [49] A Scoping Review of Trauma-Informed Curricula for Primary Care Providers
    Gundacker, Constance
    Barry, Courtney
    Laurent, Emily
    Sieracki, Rita
    [J]. FAMILY MEDICINE, 2021, 53 (10) : 843 - 856
  • [50] The impact of severe perinatal events on maternity care providers: a scoping review
    Marianne Nieuwenhuijze
    Patricia Leahy-Warren
    Maria Healy
    Songül Aktaş
    Ruveyde Aydin
    Jean Calleja-Agius
    Josefina Goberna-Tricas
    Eleni Hadjigeorgiou
    Katharina Hartmann
    Lena Henriksen
    Antje Horsch
    Ute Lange
    Margaret Murphy
    Annabelle Pierron
    Rainhild Schäfers
    Zada Pajalic
    Corine Verhoeven
    Dolores Ruiz Berdun
    Sheima Hossain
    [J]. BMC Health Services Research, 24