Health providers' reasons for participating in abortion care: A scoping review

被引:1
|
作者
Merner, Bronwen [1 ]
Haining, Casey M. [1 ]
Willmott, Lindy [2 ]
Savulescu, Julian [3 ,4 ,5 ,6 ]
Keogh, Louise A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Melbourne, Melbourne Sch Populat & Global Hlth, Parkville, Vic 3010, Australia
[2] Queensland Univ Technol, Fac Business & Law, Australian Ctr Hlth Law Res, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[3] Univ Oxford, Oxford Uehiro Ctr Pract Eth, Oxford, England
[4] Natl Univ Singapore, Ctr Biomed Eth, Yong Loo Lin Sch Med, Singapore, Singapore
[5] Murdoch Childrens Res Inst, Parkville, Vic, Australia
[6] Univ Melbourne, Parkville, Vic, Australia
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
abortion; conscientious objection; midwives; nurses; obstetrics and gynaecology; physicians; termination of pregnancy; CONSCIENTIOUS OBJECTION; NURSES; TERMINATION; PREGNANCY; EXPERIENCES; PROVISION; MIDWIVES; ATTITUDES; SERVICES; BELIEFS;
D O I
10.1177/17455057241233124
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Background: There is a global shortage of health providers in abortion care. Public discourse presents abortion providers as dangerous and greedy and links 'conscience' with refusal to participate. This may discourage provision. A scoping review of empirical evidence is needed to inform public perceptions of the reasons that health providers participate in abortion.Objective: The study aimed to identify what is known about health providers' reasons for participating in abortion provision.Eligibility criteria: Studies were eligible if they included health providers' reasons for participating in legal abortion provision. Only empirical studies were eligible for inclusion.Sources of evidence: We searched the following databases from January 2000 until January 2022: Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online, Excerpta Medica Database, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, ScienceDirect and Centre for Agricultural and Biosciences International Abstracts. Grey literature was also searched.Methods: Dual screening was conducted of both title/abstract and full-text articles. Health providers' reasons for provision were extracted and grouped into preliminary categories based on the existing research. These categories were revised by all authors until they sufficiently reflected the extracted data.Results: From 3251 records retrieved, 68 studies were included. In descending order, reasons for participating in abortion were as follows: supporting women's choices and advocating for women's rights (76%); being professionally committed to participating in abortion (50%); aligning with personal, religious or moral values (39%); finding provision satisfying and important (33%); being influenced by workplace exposure or support (19%); responding to the community needs for abortion services (14%) and participating for practical and lifestyle reasons (8%).Conclusion: Abortion providers participated in abortion for a range of reasons. Reasons were mainly focused on supporting women's choices and rights; providing professional health care; and providing services that aligned with the provider's own personal, religious or moral values. The findings provided no evidence to support negative portrayals of abortion providers present in public discourse. Like conscientious objectors, abortion providers can also be motivated by conscience.
引用
收藏
页数:25
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Health Education Serious Games Targeting Health Care Providers, Patients, and Public Health Users: Scoping Review
    Sharifzadeh, Nahid
    Kharrazi, Hadi
    Nazari, Elham
    Tabesh, Hamed
    Khodabandeh, Maryam Edalati
    Heidari, Somayeh
    Tara, Mahmood
    [J]. JMIR SERIOUS GAMES, 2020, 8 (01):
  • [22] Reasons for Third Molars Extraction by Different Health Care Providers
    Dhafar, Wala
    Mandura, Rafif
    Dafar, Amal
    Alghamdi, Mohammed
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH AND ALLIED SCIENCES, 2020, 9 (02): : 189 - 194
  • [23] The mesoeconomics of abortion: A scoping review and analysis of the economic effects of abortion on health systems
    Lattof, Samantha R.
    Coast, Ernestina
    Rodgers, Yana van der Meulen
    Moore, Brittany
    Poss, Cheri
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2020, 15 (11):
  • [24] Ideology Trumps: Health Care Providers a Barrier to Abortion Services
    Chahal, Harneet
    Mumtaz, Zubia
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF QUALITATIVE METHODS, 2016, 15 (01):
  • [25] Attitudes toward Abortion among Providers of Reproductive Health Care
    Dodge, Laura E.
    Haider, Sadia
    Hacker, Michele R.
    [J]. WOMENS HEALTH ISSUES, 2016, 26 (05) : 511 - 516
  • [26] Attitudes toward abortion among providers of reproductive health care
    Dodge, L.
    Haider, S.
    Hacker, M.
    [J]. CONTRACEPTION, 2015, 92 (04) : 371 - 371
  • [27] Maternal Health in Crisis: A Scoping Review of Barriers and Facilitators to Safe Abortion Care in Humanitarian Crises
    Dias Amaral, Bianca
    Sakellariou, Dikaios
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN GLOBAL WOMENS HEALTH, 2021, 2
  • [28] Integrative and collaborative care models between pediatric oral health and primary care providers: a scoping review of the literature
    Gauger, Tylor L.
    Prosser, Lisa A.
    Fontana, Margherita
    Polverini, Peter J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH DENTISTRY, 2018, 78 (03) : 246 - 256
  • [29] Patients' and health care providers' perspectives of sexual and reproductive health services for people with disability: a scoping review protocol
    Vujcich, Daniel
    Wilshin, Caitlin
    Lock, Eliza
    Reeves, Karina
    Lobo, Roanna
    [J]. JBI EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS, 2023, 21 (02) : 449 - 456
  • [30] The role of unregulated care providers in Canada-A scoping review
    Afzal, Arsalan
    Stolee, Paul
    Heckman, George A.
    Boscart, Veronique M.
    Sanyal, Chiranjeev
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OLDER PEOPLE NURSING, 2018, 13 (03)