Health providers' reasons for participating in abortion care: A scoping review

被引:1
|
作者
Merner, Bronwen [1 ]
Haining, Casey M. [1 ]
Willmott, Lindy [2 ]
Savulescu, Julian [3 ,4 ,5 ,6 ]
Keogh, Louise A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Melbourne, Melbourne Sch Populat & Global Hlth, Parkville, Vic 3010, Australia
[2] Queensland Univ Technol, Fac Business & Law, Australian Ctr Hlth Law Res, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[3] Univ Oxford, Oxford Uehiro Ctr Pract Eth, Oxford, England
[4] Natl Univ Singapore, Ctr Biomed Eth, Yong Loo Lin Sch Med, Singapore, Singapore
[5] Murdoch Childrens Res Inst, Parkville, Vic, Australia
[6] Univ Melbourne, Parkville, Vic, Australia
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
abortion; conscientious objection; midwives; nurses; obstetrics and gynaecology; physicians; termination of pregnancy; CONSCIENTIOUS OBJECTION; NURSES; TERMINATION; PREGNANCY; EXPERIENCES; PROVISION; MIDWIVES; ATTITUDES; SERVICES; BELIEFS;
D O I
10.1177/17455057241233124
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Background: There is a global shortage of health providers in abortion care. Public discourse presents abortion providers as dangerous and greedy and links 'conscience' with refusal to participate. This may discourage provision. A scoping review of empirical evidence is needed to inform public perceptions of the reasons that health providers participate in abortion.Objective: The study aimed to identify what is known about health providers' reasons for participating in abortion provision.Eligibility criteria: Studies were eligible if they included health providers' reasons for participating in legal abortion provision. Only empirical studies were eligible for inclusion.Sources of evidence: We searched the following databases from January 2000 until January 2022: Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online, Excerpta Medica Database, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, ScienceDirect and Centre for Agricultural and Biosciences International Abstracts. Grey literature was also searched.Methods: Dual screening was conducted of both title/abstract and full-text articles. Health providers' reasons for provision were extracted and grouped into preliminary categories based on the existing research. These categories were revised by all authors until they sufficiently reflected the extracted data.Results: From 3251 records retrieved, 68 studies were included. In descending order, reasons for participating in abortion were as follows: supporting women's choices and advocating for women's rights (76%); being professionally committed to participating in abortion (50%); aligning with personal, religious or moral values (39%); finding provision satisfying and important (33%); being influenced by workplace exposure or support (19%); responding to the community needs for abortion services (14%) and participating for practical and lifestyle reasons (8%).Conclusion: Abortion providers participated in abortion for a range of reasons. Reasons were mainly focused on supporting women's choices and rights; providing professional health care; and providing services that aligned with the provider's own personal, religious or moral values. The findings provided no evidence to support negative portrayals of abortion providers present in public discourse. Like conscientious objectors, abortion providers can also be motivated by conscience.
引用
收藏
页数:25
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Providers' experiences with abortion care: A scoping review
    Dempsey, B.
    Callaghan, S.
    Higgins, M. F.
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2024, 19 (07):
  • [2] Providers' Experience of Abortion Care: Protocol for a Scoping Review
    Dempsey, B.
    Callaghan, S.
    Higgins, M. F.
    [J]. JMIR RESEARCH PROTOCOLS, 2022, 11 (02):
  • [3] Numeracy Education for Health Care Providers: A Scoping Review
    Goldstein, Casey
    Woods, Nicole
    MacKinnon, Rebecca
    Fazelzad, Rouhi
    Gill, Bhajan
    Giuliani, Meredith Elana
    Papadakos, Tina
    Wei, Qinge
    Papadakos, Janet
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CONTINUING EDUCATION IN THE HEALTH PROFESSIONS, 2024, 44 (01) : 35 - 43
  • [4] Determinants of patient choice of health care providers: a scoping review
    Victoor, Aafke
    Delnoij, D. M. J.
    Friele, R. D.
    Rademakers, J. J. D. J. M.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2012, 22 : 264 - 264
  • [5] Teledentistry within oral health care providers' training: A scoping review
    Bakhshaei, Anahita
    Ramachandran, Swathi
    Brondani, Mario
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF DENTAL EDUCATION, 2024, 28 (02) : 631 - 644
  • [6] Barriers to Mental Health care in Canada Identified by Healthcare Providers: A Scoping Review
    Wang, Jeffrey
    Pasyk, Stanislav P.
    Slavin-Stewart, Claire
    Olagunju, Andrew T.
    [J]. ADMINISTRATION AND POLICY IN MENTAL HEALTH AND MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2024, 51 (05) : 826 - 838
  • [7] Implementation of Medical Assistance in Dying: A Scoping Review of Health Care Providers' Perspectives
    Fujioka, Jamie K.
    Mirza, Raza M.
    McDonald, P. Lynn
    Klinger, Christopher A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT, 2018, 55 (06) : 1564 - +
  • [8] Opportunities for nurses to address employee voice in health care providers: a scoping review
    Kepplinger, A.
    Braun, A.
    Fringer, A.
    Roes, M.
    [J]. BMC NURSING, 2024, 23 (01):
  • [9] Communication between persons with multiple sclerosis and their health care providers: A scoping review
    Thompson, Charee M.
    Pulido, Manuel D.
    Babu, Sara
    Zenzola, Nicole
    Chiu, Chungyi
    [J]. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2022, 105 (12) : 3341 - 3368
  • [10] Describing the evidence-base for research engagement by health care providers and health care organisations: a scoping review
    Sze Lin Yoong
    Katarzyna Bolsewicz
    Kathryn Reilly
    Christopher Williams
    Luke Wolfenden
    Alice Grady
    Melanie Kingsland
    Meghan Finch
    John Wiggers
    [J]. BMC Health Services Research, 23