First-Year Experience of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy/Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy Treatment Using a Novel Biology-Guided Radiation Therapy Machine

被引:1
|
作者
Shi, Mengying [1 ,2 ]
Simiele, Eric [1 ,3 ]
Han, Bin [1 ]
Pham, Daniel [1 ]
Palomares, Paul [1 ]
Aguirre, Michaela [1 ]
Gensheimer, Michael [1 ]
Vitzthum, Lucas [1 ]
Le, Quynh-Thu [1 ]
Surucu, Murat [1 ]
Kovalchuk, Nataliya [1 ]
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Dept Radiat Oncol, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[2] Univ Calif Irvine, Dept Radiat Oncol, Orange, CA USA
[3] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Dept Radiat Oncol, Birmingham, AL USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.adro.2023.101300
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: The aim of this study was to present the first -year experience of treating patients using intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) with a biology -guided radiation therapy machine, the RefleXion X1 system, installed in a clinical setting. Methods and Materials: A total of 78 patients were treated on the X1 system using IMRT and SBRT from May 2021 to May 2022. Clinical and technical data including treatment sites, number of pretreatment kilovoltage computed tomography (kVCT) scans, beamon time, patient setup time, and imaging time were collected and analyzed. Machine quality assurance (QA) results, machine performance, and user satisfactory survey were also collected and reported. Results: The most commonly treated site was the head and neck (63%), followed by the pelvis (23%), abdomen (8%), and thorax (6%). Except for 5 patients (6%) who received SBRT treatments for bony metastases in the pelvis, all treatments were conventionally fractionated IMRT. The number of kVCT scans per fraction was 1.2 +/- 0.5 (mean +/- standard deviation). The beam -on time was 9.2 +/- 3.5 minutes. The patient setup time and imaging time per kVCT was 4.8 +/- 2.6 minutes and 4.6 +/- 1.5 minutes, respectively. The daily machine output deviation was 0.4 +/- 1.2% from the baseline. The patient QA had a passing rate of 97.4 +/- 2.8% at 3%/2 mm gamma criteria. The machine uptime was 92% of the total treatment time. The daily QA and kVCT image quality received the highest level of satisfaction. The treatment workflow for therapists received the lowest level of satisfaction. Conclusions: One year after the installation, 78 patients were successfully treated with the X1 system using IMRT and/or SBRT. With the recent Food and Drug Administration clearance of biology -guided radiation therapy, our department is preparing to treat patients using positron emission tomography -guidance via a new product release, which will address deficiencies in the current image -guided radiation therapy workflow. (c) 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of American Society for Radiation Oncology. This is an open access article under the CC BY -NC -ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Treatment of recurrent malignant gliomas with stereotactic intensity modulated radiation therapy
    Voynov, G
    Kaufman, S
    Hong, T
    Pinkerton, A
    Simon, R
    Dowsett, R
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY-CANCER CLINICAL TRIALS, 2002, 25 (06): : 606 - 611
  • [32] Outcome of intensity-modulated radiation therapy-based stereotactic radiation therapy for treatment of canine nasal carcinomas
    Fox-Alvarez, Stacey
    Shiomitsu, Keijiro
    Lejeune, Amandine T.
    Szivek, Anna
    Kubicek, Lyndsay
    VETERINARY RADIOLOGY & ULTRASOUND, 2020, 61 (03) : 370 - 378
  • [33] The Equivalence of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy and Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy for Prostate Cancer Stratified by 2015 NCCN Risk Groups
    Manahan, G.
    Ricco, A.
    Bernetich, M.
    Lanciano, R. M.
    Yang, J.
    Hanlon, A.
    Arrigo, S. A.
    Lamond, J. P.
    Brady, L. W., Jr.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2015, 93 (03): : E217 - E217
  • [34] Intensity-modulated radiation therapy and stereotactic body radiation therapy for head and neck tumors: Evidence-based medicine
    Lapierre, A.
    Martin, F.
    Lapeyre, M.
    CANCER RADIOTHERAPIE, 2014, 18 (5-6): : 468 - 472
  • [35] Regarding Relative Toxicities of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy Versus Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy for Prostate Cancer Reply
    Yu, James B.
    Cramer, Laura D.
    Herrin, Jeph
    Soulos, Pamela R.
    Potosky, Arnold L.
    Gross, Cary P.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2014, 32 (30) : 3456 - U148
  • [36] Toxicity of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy Versus Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy for Prostate Cancer: A Potential Comparison Bias
    Arcangeli, Stefano
    De Bari, Berardino
    Alongi, Filippo
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2014, 32 (30) : 3454 - 3454
  • [37] Adaptive Radiation Therapy for Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) Treatment of Prostate Adenocarcinoma
    Semon, M. A.
    Isaac, M.
    MacKowiak, L. E.
    Semon, M. J.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2013, 87 (02): : S720 - S720
  • [38] Intensity modulated radiation therapy
    Rose, CM
    WESTERN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1998, 169 (05): : 285 - 286
  • [39] Intensity modulated radiation therapy
    Maingon, P.
    Marchesi, V.
    Crehange, G.
    BULLETIN DU CANCER, 2010, 97 (07) : 759 - 768
  • [40] Intensity modulated radiation therapy
    Maingon, P.
    Truc, G.
    Peignaux, K.
    Crehange, G.
    Lagpeau, E.
    ONCOLOGIE, 2007, 9 (06) : 417 - 421