First-Year Experience of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy/Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy Treatment Using a Novel Biology-Guided Radiation Therapy Machine

被引:1
|
作者
Shi, Mengying [1 ,2 ]
Simiele, Eric [1 ,3 ]
Han, Bin [1 ]
Pham, Daniel [1 ]
Palomares, Paul [1 ]
Aguirre, Michaela [1 ]
Gensheimer, Michael [1 ]
Vitzthum, Lucas [1 ]
Le, Quynh-Thu [1 ]
Surucu, Murat [1 ]
Kovalchuk, Nataliya [1 ]
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Dept Radiat Oncol, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[2] Univ Calif Irvine, Dept Radiat Oncol, Orange, CA USA
[3] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Dept Radiat Oncol, Birmingham, AL USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.adro.2023.101300
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: The aim of this study was to present the first -year experience of treating patients using intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) with a biology -guided radiation therapy machine, the RefleXion X1 system, installed in a clinical setting. Methods and Materials: A total of 78 patients were treated on the X1 system using IMRT and SBRT from May 2021 to May 2022. Clinical and technical data including treatment sites, number of pretreatment kilovoltage computed tomography (kVCT) scans, beamon time, patient setup time, and imaging time were collected and analyzed. Machine quality assurance (QA) results, machine performance, and user satisfactory survey were also collected and reported. Results: The most commonly treated site was the head and neck (63%), followed by the pelvis (23%), abdomen (8%), and thorax (6%). Except for 5 patients (6%) who received SBRT treatments for bony metastases in the pelvis, all treatments were conventionally fractionated IMRT. The number of kVCT scans per fraction was 1.2 +/- 0.5 (mean +/- standard deviation). The beam -on time was 9.2 +/- 3.5 minutes. The patient setup time and imaging time per kVCT was 4.8 +/- 2.6 minutes and 4.6 +/- 1.5 minutes, respectively. The daily machine output deviation was 0.4 +/- 1.2% from the baseline. The patient QA had a passing rate of 97.4 +/- 2.8% at 3%/2 mm gamma criteria. The machine uptime was 92% of the total treatment time. The daily QA and kVCT image quality received the highest level of satisfaction. The treatment workflow for therapists received the lowest level of satisfaction. Conclusions: One year after the installation, 78 patients were successfully treated with the X1 system using IMRT and/or SBRT. With the recent Food and Drug Administration clearance of biology -guided radiation therapy, our department is preparing to treat patients using positron emission tomography -guidance via a new product release, which will address deficiencies in the current image -guided radiation therapy workflow. (c) 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of American Society for Radiation Oncology. This is an open access article under the CC BY -NC -ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Stereotactic body radiation therapy: a novel treatment modality
    Simon S. Lo
    Achilles J. Fakiris
    Eric L. Chang
    Nina A. Mayr
    Jian Z. Wang
    Lech Papiez
    Bin S. Teh
    Ronald C. McGarry
    Higinia R. Cardenes
    Robert D. Timmerman
    Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology, 2010, 7 : 44 - 54
  • [22] Intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) versus intensity modulated stereotactic radiation therapy (IMSRT) for children with intraocular retinoblastoma
    Pica, A
    Munier, F
    Balmer, A
    Do, HP
    Bressan, S
    Bulling, S
    Mirimanoff, RO
    Moeckli, R
    STRAHLENTHERAPIE UND ONKOLOGIE, 2005, 181 : 144 - 144
  • [23] Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy for Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy: Initial Clinical Experience
    Matuszak, M.
    Yan, D.
    Grills, I.
    Martinez, A.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2009, 75 (03): : S723 - S724
  • [24] Image registration in intensity-modulated, image-guided and stereotactic body radiation therapy
    Brock, Kristy K.
    IMRT, IGRT, SBRT: ADVANCES IN THE TREATMENT PLANNING AND DELIVERY OF RADIOTHERAPY, 2007, 40 : 94 - 115
  • [25] Comparison of RapidArc vs. Conventional Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy for Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Pancreatic Cancer
    Kielar, K. N.
    Atwood, T. F.
    Taniguchi, C. M.
    Christman-Skieller, C.
    Xing, L.
    Koong, A. C.
    Chang, D. T.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2010, 78 (03): : S785 - S785
  • [26] The Comparison of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy and Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy for Prostate Cancer by NCCN Risk Groups
    Ricco, Anthony
    Manahan, Genevieve
    Lanciano, Rachelle
    Hanlon, Alexandra
    Yang, Jun
    Arrigo, Stephen
    Lamond, John
    Feng, Jing
    Mooreville, Michael
    Garber, Bruce
    Brady, Luther
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2016, 6
  • [27] Regarding Relative Toxicities of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy Versus Intensity- Modulated Radiation Therapy for Prostate Cancer
    Fuller, Donald B.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2014, 32 (30) : 3455 - U145
  • [28] Dosimetric Evaluation of Noncoplanar Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy and Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy Delivery Techniques for Cervical Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy Treatments
    Cohen, D.
    Delgado, A. Brito
    Eng, T. Y.
    Gutierrez, A. N.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2016, 96 (02): : E666 - E667
  • [29] Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy with Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy Boost for Unfavorable Prostate Cancer: A Report on 3-Year Toxicity
    Paydar, Ima
    Pepin, Abigail
    Cyr, Robyn A.
    King, Joseph
    Yung, Thomas M.
    Bullock, ElizabethG.
    Lei, Siyuan
    Satinsky, Andrew
    Harter, K. William
    Suy, Simeng
    Dritschilo, Anatoly
    Lynch, John H.
    Kole, Thomas P.
    Collins, Sean P.
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2017, 7
  • [30] Conformal Radiation Therapy or Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy: Institutional Experience in the Management of Colorectal Liver Metastases by Radiation Therapy
    He, Zemin
    Chen, Gang
    Ouyang, Bo
    Zhang, Haoyue
    Chen, Hui
    Wang, Yehuang
    Yan, Shushan
    Pan, Wei
    TECHNOLOGY IN CANCER RESEARCH & TREATMENT, 2018, 17