Only gifted students benefit from ICT use at school in mathematics learning

被引:3
|
作者
Vargas-Montoya, Luis [1 ]
Gimenez, Gregorio [2 ]
Tkacheva, Liubov [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Costa Rica, Sede Rodrigo Facio, San Jose, Costa Rica
[2] Univ Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain
[3] St Petersburg State Univ, St Petersburg, Russia
关键词
ICT use; Mathematics learning; Gifted students; Talented students; Adolescents; PISA; TECHNOLOGY; ACHIEVEMENT; EDUCATION; TEACHERS; SENSE;
D O I
10.1007/s10639-023-12136-2
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Previous literature highlights the potential of ICT use to enhance mathematical learning. There are also several theoretical arguments supporting that gifted education benefits from ICT use. However, empirical studies have paid little attention to the relationship between ICT use and gifted students' mathematics performance. It is also unclear whether and why this relationship differs between gifted students and their peers. For the first time, we tested this relationship by using a large-scale multinational sample of 236,938 adolescents attending 10,213 schools in 44 countries in several contexts from the Programme for International Student Assessment Questionnaire (PISA) 2018. We estimated a hierarchical linear model (HLM) and found that only gifted students benefit from ICT use in mathematics learning. The higher their level of performance, the more beneficial ICT use is for gifted students. This relation is negative in the case of the rest of the students. Based on theoretical arguments, we also explain the likely reasons that lay behind this different relationship between gifted students and their peers. The findings illustrate that policymakers should consider a differentiated approach to ICT use at school depending on the students' level of performance. Gifted students could benefit more from ICT use in learning and the rest of the students from teaching with more human interaction.
引用
收藏
页码:8301 / 8326
页数:26
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Mathematics learning strategies of high school students in Nepal
    Bishnu Khanal
    Ram Krishna Panthi
    Mukunda Prakash Kshetree
    Bed Raj Acharya
    Shashidhar Belbase
    SN Social Sciences, 1 (7):
  • [32] Secondary School Students' Types of Thinking in Learning Mathematics
    Reihenova, Austra
    SOCIETY, INTEGRATION, EDUCATION, VOL. II, 2018: SCHOOL PEDAGOGY PRESCHOOL PEDAGOGY, 2018, : 405 - 417
  • [33] INTERDISCIPLINARY NONFORMAL LEARNING FOR TALENTED STUDENTS FROM THE SOFIA HIGH SCHOOL OF MATHEMATICS
    Gendjova, Alexandria
    Tolev, Boris
    PEDAGOGIKA-PEDAGOGY, 2018, 90 (01): : 71 - 80
  • [34] Gifted High School Students' Needs for English Learning in Vietnam Contexts
    Hung, Do Minh
    Ai, Nguyen Thi Thu
    ARAB WORLD ENGLISH JOURNAL, 2021, 12 (03) : 351 - 365
  • [35] The value of using ICT in the education of school students with learning difficulties
    Adam T.
    Tatnall A.
    Education and Information Technologies, 2017, 22 (6) : 2711 - 2726
  • [36] Distance Learning for Gifted Students: Outcomes for Elementary, Middle, and High School Aged Students
    Wallace, Patricia
    JOURNAL FOR THE EDUCATION OF THE GIFTED, 2009, 32 (03) : 295 - 320
  • [37] ICT driven pedagogies and its impact on learning outcomes in high school mathematics
    Chandra, Vinesh
    Briskey, Jo
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PEDAGOGIES & LEARNING, 2012, 7 (01): : 73 - 83
  • [38] THE USE OF ICT BY HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS AND THE IMPACT ON ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE
    Carranza Alcantar, Maria del Rocio
    Islas Torres, Claudia
    Caldera Montes, Juan Francisco
    Jimenez Padilla, Alma Azucena
    Alcaraz Bran, Daisy
    INTED2017: 11TH INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY, EDUCATION AND DEVELOPMENT CONFERENCE, 2017, : 2428 - 2436
  • [39] THE USE OF KINETIC SCHOOL DRAWINGS TO EXPLORE THE EDUCATIONAL PREFERENCES OF GIFTED STUDENTS
    ARMSTRONG, DC
    JOURNAL FOR THE EDUCATION OF THE GIFTED, 1995, 18 (04) : 410 - 439
  • [40] Primary and Secondary Education students' perspectives on the school use of ICT
    Area Moreira, Manuel
    Cepeda Romero, Olga
    Feliciano Garcia, Luis
    EDUCATIO SIGLO XXI, 2018, 36 (02): : 229 - 253