Only gifted students benefit from ICT use at school in mathematics learning

被引:3
|
作者
Vargas-Montoya, Luis [1 ]
Gimenez, Gregorio [2 ]
Tkacheva, Liubov [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Costa Rica, Sede Rodrigo Facio, San Jose, Costa Rica
[2] Univ Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain
[3] St Petersburg State Univ, St Petersburg, Russia
关键词
ICT use; Mathematics learning; Gifted students; Talented students; Adolescents; PISA; TECHNOLOGY; ACHIEVEMENT; EDUCATION; TEACHERS; SENSE;
D O I
10.1007/s10639-023-12136-2
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Previous literature highlights the potential of ICT use to enhance mathematical learning. There are also several theoretical arguments supporting that gifted education benefits from ICT use. However, empirical studies have paid little attention to the relationship between ICT use and gifted students' mathematics performance. It is also unclear whether and why this relationship differs between gifted students and their peers. For the first time, we tested this relationship by using a large-scale multinational sample of 236,938 adolescents attending 10,213 schools in 44 countries in several contexts from the Programme for International Student Assessment Questionnaire (PISA) 2018. We estimated a hierarchical linear model (HLM) and found that only gifted students benefit from ICT use in mathematics learning. The higher their level of performance, the more beneficial ICT use is for gifted students. This relation is negative in the case of the rest of the students. Based on theoretical arguments, we also explain the likely reasons that lay behind this different relationship between gifted students and their peers. The findings illustrate that policymakers should consider a differentiated approach to ICT use at school depending on the students' level of performance. Gifted students could benefit more from ICT use in learning and the rest of the students from teaching with more human interaction.
引用
收藏
页码:8301 / 8326
页数:26
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] SET-LEARNING IN GIFTED HIGH-SCHOOL-STUDENTS
    ENTWISLE, DR
    SCHOOL REVIEW, 1962, 70 (04): : 473 - 482
  • [22] Cognitive and affective learning outcomes of gifted elementary school students
    Delcourt, Marcia A. B.
    Cornell, Dewey G.
    Goldberg, Marc D.
    GIFTED CHILD QUARTERLY, 2007, 51 (04) : 359 - 381
  • [23] The Use of ICT in Teaching Mathematics - A Comparative Analysis of the Success of 7th Grade Primary School Students
    Tomljenovic, Kreso
    Zovko, Vatroslav
    CROATIAN JOURNAL OF EDUCATION-HRVATSKI CASOPIS ZA ODGOJ I OBRAZOVANJE, 2016, 18 : 215 - 220
  • [24] ICT TOOLS USED IN TEACHING AND LEARNING CONCEPT OF FUNCTION IN SCHOOL MATHEMATICS
    Nocar, David
    Zdrahal, Tomas
    ICERI2016: 9TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF EDUCATION, RESEARCH AND INNOVATION, 2016, : 11 - 16
  • [26] Relationships between School Support, School Facilities, ICT Culture and Mathematics Teachers' Attitudes towards ICT in Teaching and Learning
    Ayub, Ahmad Fauzi Mohd
    Abu Bakar, Kamariah
    Ismail, Rohayati
    5TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON RESEARCH AND EDUCATION IN MATHEMATICS (ICREM5), 2012, 1450 : 196 - 200
  • [27] EDUCATIONAL ACTIVITIES FOR TEACHING - LEARNING MATHEMATICS AT SECONDARY TO THE USE OF ICT
    Roldan, A.
    Roldan, C.
    Martinez-Moreno, J.
    Aguilar, C.
    EDULEARN12: 4TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON EDUCATION AND NEW LEARNING TECHNOLOGIES, 2012, : 5531 - 5538
  • [28] The use of oral questioning to improve students' reasoning skills in primary school mathematics learning
    Mahmud, Muhammad Sofwan
    Drus, Nadia Fasha Mohd
    FRONTIERS IN EDUCATION, 2023, 8
  • [29] Perfectionism, School Motivation, Learning Styles and Academic Achievement of Gifted and Non-Gifted Students
    Altun, Fatma
    Yazici, Hikmet
    CROATIAN JOURNAL OF EDUCATION-HRVATSKI CASOPIS ZA ODGOJ I OBRAZOVANJE, 2014, 16 (04): : 1031 - 1054
  • [30] Does boarding benefit the mathematics achievement of primary and middle school students? Evidence from China
    Guo, Siwen
    Li, Lingyan
    Sun, Yan
    Houang, Richard
    Schmidt, William H.
    ASIA PACIFIC JOURNAL OF EDUCATION, 2021, 41 (01) : 16 - 38