Impact of remote audit on audit quality, audit efficiency, and auditors' job satisfaction

被引:4
|
作者
Li, Yueqi [1 ,2 ]
Goel, Sanjay [1 ]
Williams, Kevin [1 ]
机构
[1] SUNY Albany, Dept Informat Sci & Technol, Albany, NY USA
[2] SUNY Albany, 1400 Washington Ave, Albany, NY 12222 USA
关键词
audit efficiency; audit quality; external auditor; job satisfaction; on-site audits; remote audits; COMMUNICATION; INDEPENDENCE; PERCEPTIONS; PERSONALITY; REGRESSION; EXPERTISE; EMPLOYEES; PRESSURE; INSIGHTS; SUPPORT;
D O I
10.1111/ijau.12306
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
The audit profession has experienced a digital transformation over the last decade with a rapid shift towards remote auditing forced by the recent COVID pandemic. This shift has led to changes related to the way auditors work and perceive. Through a survey of external auditors, this study addresses how the changes from on-site audits to remote audits affect audit success (i.e., audit quality, audit efficiency, and auditors' job satisfaction); we also explore dispositional and situational factors that contribute to remote audit success. Our results show that working remotely leads to high audit efficiency. Auditors' flexibility management competency leads to high remote audit quality and efficiency; and a physical working environment conducive for concentrating on audit tasks is positively associated with audit efficiency and auditors' job satisfaction for remote audits. We also found that working remotely could enhance audit quality and efficiency when the audit firm provides sufficient support to auditors. Our study provides insights for audit firms, regulators, and other stakeholders as they evaluate the many challenges the audit profession faces in achieving remote audit success.
引用
收藏
页码:130 / 149
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Do Social Ties between External Auditors and Audit Committee Members Affect Audit Quality?
    He, Xianjie
    Pittman, Jeffrey A.
    Rui, Oliver M.
    Wu, Donghui
    [J]. ACCOUNTING REVIEW, 2017, 92 (05): : 61 - 87
  • [32] Do key audit matters (KAMs) matter? Auditors' perceptions of KAMs and audit quality in Finland
    Rautiainen, Antti
    Saastamoinen, Jani
    Pajunen, Kati
    [J]. MANAGERIAL AUDITING JOURNAL, 2021, 36 (03) : 386 - 404
  • [33] Effects of the 2014 European reform on audit activity, the audit outcome and the audit market: the auditors' view
    Castillo-Merino, David
    Garcia-Blandon, Josep
    Rodriguez-Perez, Gonzalo
    [J]. MEDITARI ACCOUNTANCY RESEARCH, 2024, 32 (07) : 109 - 140
  • [34] The Effect of Audit Experience on Audit Fees and Audit Quality
    Cahan, Steven
    Sun, Jerry
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING AUDITING AND FINANCE, 2015, 30 (01): : 78 - 100
  • [35] Diversification by the audit offices in the US and its impact on audit quality
    Asthana S.
    [J]. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 2017, 48 (4) : 1003 - 1030
  • [36] Audit Office Size, Audit Quality, and Audit Pricing
    Choi, Jong-Hag
    Kim, Chansog
    Kim, Jeong-Bon
    Zang, Yoonseok
    [J]. AUDITING-A JOURNAL OF PRACTICE & THEORY, 2010, 29 (01): : 73 - 97
  • [37] AUDIT COMMITTEE AND INTERNAL AUDIT: IMPLICATIONS ON AUDIT QUALITY
    Yasin, Fatimah Mat
    Nelson, Sherliza Puat
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS MANAGEMENT AND ACCOUNTING, 2012, 20 (02): : 187 - 218
  • [38] The Impact of Internal Audit Function Quality and Contribution on Audit Delay
    Pizzini, Mina
    Lin, Shu
    Ziegenfuss, Douglas E.
    [J]. AUDITING-A JOURNAL OF PRACTICE & THEORY, 2015, 34 (01): : 25 - 58
  • [39] Scope of auditors' liability, audit quality, and capital investment
    Chan D.K.
    Wong K.P.
    [J]. Review of Accounting Studies, 2002, 7 (1) : 97 - 122
  • [40] CHANGING AUDITORS AND AUDIT RESPONSIBILITIES
    CARMICHAEL, DR
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTANCY, 1970, 130 (05): : 70 - 73