When do M&As with Fintech Firms Benefit Traditional Banks?

被引:14
|
作者
Collevecchio, Francesca [1 ]
Cappa, Francesco [2 ,3 ]
Peruffo, Enzo [3 ]
Oriani, Raffaele [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Politecn Marche, Dept Management, Piazzale Martelli 8, I-60121 Ancona, Italy
[2] Campus Biomed Univ, Dept Engn, Via Alvaro Portillo, I-00128 Rome, Italy
[3] LUISS Guido Carli Univ, Dept Business & Management, Viale Pola 12, I-00198 Rome, Italy
关键词
CORPORATE SOCIAL-RESPONSIBILITY; OPEN INNOVATION RESEARCH; SAMPLE SELECTION BIAS; INSTITUTIONAL DISTANCE; PERFORMANCE EVIDENCE; FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE; EQUITY OWNERSHIP; ACQUISITIONS; IMPACT; MERGERS;
D O I
10.1111/1467-8551.12701
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
In the last decade, fintech has emerged in the financial sector, introducing numerous innovations that have severely impacted traditional banks. To respond to fintech firms and meet the new needs of consumers, banks seek to align their offerings by integrating fintech knowledge through mergers and acquisitions (M&As) within an open innovation framework. However, it is still not clear when exactly M&As with fintech firms benefit banks. This paper examines the contingency factors that make M&As beneficial for acquirer banks by using a holistic approach that considers the type of firm, type of deal and the context in which M&As occur. We analysed the effect produced by acquirer sustainability, minority acquisitions and institutional distance between the fintech and the bank's country of incorporation by applying an event study methodology using cumulative abnormal returns to gauge effects on expected performance. We have shown which are the conditions that allow us to maximize the acquirer bank's expected performance. Our research advances the scientific understanding of M&A contingency factors, and more generally of open innovation, in the specific context of fintech and banks. Moreover, we provide managers and policymakers with initial advice on the effects fintech M&As have on traditional banks, showing that they can be beneficial under specific conditions.
引用
收藏
页码:192 / 209
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] When do Non-financial Goals Benefit Stakeholders? Theorizing on Care and Power in Family Firms
    Melanie Richards
    [J]. Journal of Business Ethics, 2023, 184 : 333 - 351
  • [42] When do Non-financial Goals Benefit Stakeholders? Theorizing on Care and Power in Family Firms
    Richards, Melanie
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2023, 184 (02) : 333 - 351
  • [43] Cross-border M&As by Chinese firms: An analysis of strategic motivation and performance
    Wang, Qian
    Boateng, Agyenim
    [J]. PROCEEDING OF CHINA PRIVATE ECONOMY INNOVATION INTERNATIONAL FORUM, 2007, : 18 - 27
  • [44] Do FinTech acquisitions improve the operating performance or risk profiles of acquiring firms?
    Austin, Rebekah E.
    Dunham, Lee M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS AND BUSINESS, 2022, 121
  • [45] Governance structures and the compensation of powerful corporate leaders in financial firms during M&As
    Agyei-Boapeah, Henry
    Ntim, Collins G.
    Fosu, Samuel
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL ACCOUNTING AUDITING AND TAXATION, 2019, 37
  • [46] Cross-Border M&As by Chinese Firms: An Analysis of Strategic Motives and Performance
    Boateng, Agyenim
    Qian, Wang
    Tianle, Yang
    [J]. THUNDERBIRD INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS REVIEW, 2008, 50 (04) : 259 - 270
  • [47] "Forgive but Not Forget": The Behavior of Relationship Banks When Firms Are in Distress
    Schaefer, Larissa
    [J]. REVIEW OF FINANCE, 2019, 23 (06) : 1079 - 1114
  • [48] Can firms learn by observing? Evidence from cross-border M&As
    Francis, Bill B.
    Hasan, Iftekhar
    Sun, Xian
    Waisman, Maya
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CORPORATE FINANCE, 2014, 25 : 202 - 215
  • [49] Are mergers among cooperative banks worth a dime? Evidence on efficiency effects of M&As in Italy
    Coccorese, Paolo
    Ferri, Giovanni
    [J]. ECONOMIC MODELLING, 2020, 84 : 147 - 164
  • [50] DO THE M-AND-M PROPOSITIONS APPLY TO BANKS
    MILLER, MH
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BANKING & FINANCE, 1995, 19 (3-4) : 483 - 489