When do M&As with Fintech Firms Benefit Traditional Banks?

被引:14
|
作者
Collevecchio, Francesca [1 ]
Cappa, Francesco [2 ,3 ]
Peruffo, Enzo [3 ]
Oriani, Raffaele [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Politecn Marche, Dept Management, Piazzale Martelli 8, I-60121 Ancona, Italy
[2] Campus Biomed Univ, Dept Engn, Via Alvaro Portillo, I-00128 Rome, Italy
[3] LUISS Guido Carli Univ, Dept Business & Management, Viale Pola 12, I-00198 Rome, Italy
关键词
CORPORATE SOCIAL-RESPONSIBILITY; OPEN INNOVATION RESEARCH; SAMPLE SELECTION BIAS; INSTITUTIONAL DISTANCE; PERFORMANCE EVIDENCE; FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE; EQUITY OWNERSHIP; ACQUISITIONS; IMPACT; MERGERS;
D O I
10.1111/1467-8551.12701
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
In the last decade, fintech has emerged in the financial sector, introducing numerous innovations that have severely impacted traditional banks. To respond to fintech firms and meet the new needs of consumers, banks seek to align their offerings by integrating fintech knowledge through mergers and acquisitions (M&As) within an open innovation framework. However, it is still not clear when exactly M&As with fintech firms benefit banks. This paper examines the contingency factors that make M&As beneficial for acquirer banks by using a holistic approach that considers the type of firm, type of deal and the context in which M&As occur. We analysed the effect produced by acquirer sustainability, minority acquisitions and institutional distance between the fintech and the bank's country of incorporation by applying an event study methodology using cumulative abnormal returns to gauge effects on expected performance. We have shown which are the conditions that allow us to maximize the acquirer bank's expected performance. Our research advances the scientific understanding of M&A contingency factors, and more generally of open innovation, in the specific context of fintech and banks. Moreover, we provide managers and policymakers with initial advice on the effects fintech M&As have on traditional banks, showing that they can be beneficial under specific conditions.
引用
收藏
页码:192 / 209
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] When do firms benefit from joint price and lead-time competition?
    Sun, Yiqi
    Wu, Zhengping
    Zhu, Wanshan
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2022, 302 (02) : 497 - 517
  • [22] Do Stock Ownership by Members of the Legislature Benefit Firms to Get Government-controlled Banks' Loans?
    Chung, Yu-Hsuan
    Chung, Hui-Fen
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING REVIEW, 2021, 72 : 119 - 177
  • [23] Mergers and Acquisitions (M&AS) by R&D Intensive Firms
    Dutta, Shantanu
    Kumar, Vinod
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RISK AND FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT, 2009, 2 (01): : 1 - 37
  • [24] DO BANKS OVERBID WHEN ACQUIRING FAILED BANKS
    PETTWAY, RH
    TRIFTS, JW
    [J]. FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT, 1985, 14 (02) : 5 - 15
  • [25] Cross-border M&As and the performance of Chinese acquiring firms
    Sun, Wenli
    Xie, Dan
    [J]. WORLD ECONOMY, 2022, 45 (05): : 1614 - 1647
  • [26] Do Banks Price Firms' Data Breaches?
    Huang, Henry He
    Wang, Chong
    [J]. ACCOUNTING REVIEW, 2021, 96 (03): : 261 - 286
  • [27] CAN RAINMAKERS JUSTIFY THEIR PAY? THE ROLE OF INVESTMENT BANKS IN REIT M&As
    Zhang, Weiwei
    Sun, Tiezhu
    Goh, Patrick Han Lin
    Wang, Zilong
    Mansley, Nick
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF STRATEGIC PROPERTY MANAGEMENT, 2021, 25 (04) : 254 - 266
  • [28] Strategies for M&As: when is acquisition the right mode to grow?
    Capron, Laurence
    [J]. ACCOUNTING AND BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2016, 46 (05) : 453 - 462
  • [29] Do Community Banks Benefit from Diversification?
    Kevin J. Stiroh
    [J]. Journal of Financial Services Research, 2004, 25 (2-3) : 135 - 160
  • [30] WHAT TO DO WHEN THE BANKS BUST
    Pearce, Fred
    [J]. NEW SCIENTIST, 2014, 224 (2994) : 40 - 43