Ethereum Proof-of-Stake under Scrutiny

被引:12
|
作者
Pavloff, Ulysse [1 ]
Amoussou-Guenou, Yackolley [1 ]
Tucci-Piergiovanni, Sara [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Paris Saclay, CEA, List, Palaiseau, France
关键词
Ethereum Proof-of-Stake; Liveness; Availability; Bouncing attack;
D O I
10.1145/3555776.3577655
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Ethereum has undergone a recent change called the Merge, which made Ethereum a Proof-of-Stake blockchain shifting closer to BFT consensus. Ethereum, which wished to keep the best of the two protocol designs (BFT and Nakomoto-style), now has a convoluted consensus protocol as its core. The result is a blockchain being possibly produced in a tree-like form while participants try to finalize blocks. Several attacks jeopardizing liveness have been found in this new setting. The Ethereum community has responded by creating a patch. We discovered a new attack on the patched protocol. To support our analysis, we propose a new high-level formalization of the properties of liveness and availability of the Ethereum blockchain, and we provide a pseudo-code. We believe this formalization to be helpful for other analyses as well. Our results yield that the Ethereum Proof-of-Stake has probabilistic liveness, influenced by the parameter describing the time frame allowed for validators to change their mind about the current main chain.
引用
收藏
页码:212 / 221
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Ouroboros Crypsinous: Privacy-Preserving Proof-of-Stake
    Kerber, Thomas
    Kiayias, Aggelos
    Kohlweiss, Markulf
    Zikas, Vassilis
    2019 IEEE SYMPOSIUM ON SECURITY AND PRIVACY (SP 2019), 2019, : 157 - 174
  • [42] Virtual ASICs: Generalized Proof-of-Stake Mining in Cryptocurrencies
    Ganesh, Chaya
    Orlandi, Claudio
    Tschudi, Daniel
    Zohar, Aviv
    DATA PRIVACY MANAGEMENT, CRYPTOCURRENCIES AND BLOCKCHAIN TECHNOLOGY, ESORICS 2021, 2022, 13140 : 173 - 191
  • [43] Looking for stability in proof-of-stake based consensus mechanisms
    Leporati, Alberto
    Rovida, Lorenzo
    Blockchain: Research and Applications, 2024, 5 (04):
  • [44] MISS-STAKE BY IRS: PROOF-OF-STAKE'S UNDERINCLUSIVE REGULATORY GUIDANCE
    Duncans, Jack H.
    SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA LAW REVIEW, 2024, 97 (02) : 537 - 570
  • [45] Do crypto investors care about energy use and climate change? Evidence from Ethereum's transition to proof-of-stake
    Baur, Dirk G.
    Karlsen, Jonathan R.
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2024, 369
  • [46] Bitcoin-Enhanced Proof-of-Stake Security: Possibilities and Impossibilities
    Tas, Ertem Nusret
    Tse, David
    Gai, Fangyu
    Kannan, Sreeram
    Maddah-Ali, Mohammad Ali
    Yu, Fisher
    2023 IEEE SYMPOSIUM ON SECURITY AND PRIVACY, SP, 2023, : 126 - 145
  • [47] Consistency of Proof-of-Stake Blockchains with Concurrent Honest Slot Leaders
    Kiayias, Aggelos
    Quader, Saad
    Russell, Alexander
    2020 IEEE 40TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON DISTRIBUTED COMPUTING SYSTEMS (ICDCS), 2020, : 776 - 786
  • [48] A novel approach to alleviate wealth compounding in proof-of-stake cryptocurrencies
    Naderi, Zahra
    Shariatpanahi, Seyed Pooya
    Bahrak, Behnam
    PEER-TO-PEER NETWORKING AND APPLICATIONS, 2024, 17 (03) : 1322 - 1334
  • [49] Proof-of-Stake Longest Chain Protocols: Security vs Predictability
    Bagaria, Vivek
    Dembo, Amir
    Kannan, Sreeram
    Oh, Sewoong
    Tse, David
    Viswanath, Pramod
    Wang, Xuechao
    Zeitoun, Ofer
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2022 ACM WORKSHOP ON DEVELOPMENTS IN CONSENSUS, CONSENSUSDAY 2022, 2022, : 29 - 42
  • [50] Formal Barriers to Longest-Chain Proof-of-Stake Protocols
    Brown-Cohen, Jonah
    Narayanan, Arvind
    Psomas, Alexandros
    Weinberg, S. Matthew
    ACM EC '19: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2019 ACM CONFERENCE ON ECONOMICS AND COMPUTATION, 2019, : 459 - 473