Ethereum Proof-of-Stake under Scrutiny

被引:12
|
作者
Pavloff, Ulysse [1 ]
Amoussou-Guenou, Yackolley [1 ]
Tucci-Piergiovanni, Sara [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Paris Saclay, CEA, List, Palaiseau, France
关键词
Ethereum Proof-of-Stake; Liveness; Availability; Bouncing attack;
D O I
10.1145/3555776.3577655
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Ethereum has undergone a recent change called the Merge, which made Ethereum a Proof-of-Stake blockchain shifting closer to BFT consensus. Ethereum, which wished to keep the best of the two protocol designs (BFT and Nakomoto-style), now has a convoluted consensus protocol as its core. The result is a blockchain being possibly produced in a tree-like form while participants try to finalize blocks. Several attacks jeopardizing liveness have been found in this new setting. The Ethereum community has responded by creating a patch. We discovered a new attack on the patched protocol. To support our analysis, we propose a new high-level formalization of the properties of liveness and availability of the Ethereum blockchain, and we provide a pseudo-code. We believe this formalization to be helpful for other analyses as well. Our results yield that the Ethereum Proof-of-Stake has probabilistic liveness, influenced by the parameter describing the time frame allowed for validators to change their mind about the current main chain.
引用
收藏
页码:212 / 221
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Design of Proof-of-Stake PBFT Algorithm for IoT Environments
    Misic, Jelena
    Misic, Vojislav B.
    Chang, Xiaolin
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON VEHICULAR TECHNOLOGY, 2023, 72 (02) : 2497 - 2510
  • [32] Proof-of-Stake Protocols for Privacy-Aware Blockchains
    Ganesh, Chaya
    Orlandi, Claudio
    Tschudi, Daniel
    ADVANCES IN CRYPTOLOGY - EUROCRYPT 2019, PT I, 2019, 11476 : 690 - 719
  • [33] Obfuscating Verifiable Random Functions for Proof-of-Stake Blockchains
    Shi, Yang
    Luo, Tianyuan
    Liang, Jingwen
    Au, Man Ho
    Luo, Xiapu
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON DEPENDABLE AND SECURE COMPUTING, 2024, 21 (04) : 2982 - 2996
  • [34] Puncturable Signatures and Applications in Proof-of-Stake Blockchain Protocols
    Li, Xinyu
    Xu, Jing
    Fan, Xiong
    Wang, Yuchen
    Zhang, Zhenfeng
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INFORMATION FORENSICS AND SECURITY, 2020, 15 : 3872 - 3885
  • [35] Bulwark: A proof-of-stake protocol with strong consistency and liveness
    Du, Zhiqiang
    Liu, Liangxin
    Huang, Muhong
    Fu, Yanfang
    Zhang, Wendong
    COMPUTER NETWORKS, 2024, 242
  • [36] Proof-of-Participation: Implementation of Proof-of-Stake Through Proof-of-Work
    Nandwani, Arpit
    Gupta, Mudit
    Thakur, Narina
    INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INNOVATIVE COMPUTING AND COMMUNICATIONS, VOL 1, 2019, 55 : 17 - 24
  • [37] Private Proof-of-Stake Blockchains using Differentially-Private Stake Distortion
    Wang, Chenghong
    Pujol, David
    Nayak, Kartik
    Machanavajjhala, Ashwin
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 32ND USENIX SECURITY SYMPOSIUM, 2023, : 1577 - 1594
  • [38] Sybil attacks on identity-augmented Proof-of-Stake
    Platt, Moritz
    McBurney, Peter
    COMPUTER NETWORKS, 2021, 199
  • [39] Extortion of a Staking Pool in a Proof-of-Stake Consensus Mechanism
    Bhudia, Alpesh
    Cartwright, Anna
    Cartwright, Edward
    Hernandez-Castro, Julio
    Hurley-Smith, Darren
    2022 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON OMNI-LAYER INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS (IEEE COINS 2022), 2022, : 271 - 276
  • [40] PROOF-OF-STAKE CONSENSUS METHOD FOR UPCOMING BLOCKCHAIN NETWORKS
    Krishnan, Sridharan
    Koperundevi, ArjunVikram Thiruvengavaradan
    Jayasundarapandiyan, Bharathiraja
    Sampath, Jeevanraj
    SURANAREE JOURNAL OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2023, 30 (04):