The Relationship Between Patient-Reported Outcomes and Patient Satisfaction With Ligament Reconstruction Tendon Interposition

被引:0
|
作者
Rogers, Miranda J. [1 ]
Ou, Zhining [2 ]
Clawson, Jordan W. [1 ]
Presson, Angela P. [2 ]
Stockburger, Christopher L. [3 ]
Kazmers, Nikolas H. [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Utah, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Salt Lake City, UT USA
[2] Univ Utah, Div Epidemiol, Dept Internal Med, Salt Lake City, UT USA
[3] Orthopaed & Spine Ctr Rockies, Ft Collins, CO USA
[4] Univ Utah, Dept Orthopaed, 590 Wakara Way, Salt Lake City, UT 84108 USA
来源
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Improvement; ligament reconstruction tendon interposition; LRTI; mid-term out-comes; PROMIS UE CAT; QuickDASH/QDASH; satisfaction; CLINICALLY IMPORTANT DIFFERENCE; BASAL JOINT ARTHRITIS; PREOPERATIVE EXPECTATIONS; SURGICAL-MANAGEMENT; THUMB; CARE; HAND; OSTEOARTHRITIS; TRAPEZIECTOMY; QUALITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jhsa.2023.08.010
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose Achieving the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) on an outcomes instrument and reporting satisfaction with surgical outcomes are not equivalent. We hypothesized that improvement exceeding the QuickDASH and PROMIS UE CAT MCID is associated with a greater likelihood of reporting satisfaction with ligament reconstruction tendon interposition (LRTI) treatment. Our secondary hypothesis was that a subset of patients failing to meet MCID would still be satisfied.Methods Patients >= 1 year after LRTI at one academic tertiary institution were included. QuickDASH and UE CAT v1.2 scores were obtained before and after surgery. Postoperative satisfaction and levels of improvement in pain and function were also obtained.Results A total of 93 patients completed the QuickDASH, and of those, 90 also completed the UE CAT. At a mean of 2.6 +/- 1.0 years after surgery, QuickDASH and UE CAT score improvement exceeded the previously published MCID estimates of 8.8 and 4.8. Although 90% (84/93) of the patients reported satisfaction, only 85% (72/93) and 72% (59/90) achieved MCID on the QuickDASH and UE CAT, respectively. Using the MCID estimate of 8.8, 96% (72/75) of the patients meeting the MCID were satisfied with their treatment. Those failing to achieve MCID reported significantly less physical function and pain improvement; however, most were satisfied nonetheless (68% [13/19] for QuickDASH, 77% [23/30] for UE CAT).Conclusions Achieving published MCID thresholds on the QuickDASH and PROMIS UE CAT v1.2 was predictive of patients reporting general satisfaction with their LRTI outcome >1 year after surgery. Most patients failing to achieve MCID still reported satisfaction with their LRTI. Achieving MCID thresholds alone should not be used as a surrogate for patient satisfaction with their treatment. Patient satisfaction is a complicated construct that is potentially very different from that of high-quality care.
引用
收藏
页码:1218 / 1228
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Impact of tunnel enlargement on patient-reported outcomes following isolated posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
    Kun-Han Lee
    Tai-Jung Huang
    Hsuan-Hsiao Ma
    Kun-Hui Chen
    Hsiao-Li Ma
    En-Rung Chiang
    Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, 20 (1)
  • [42] Concordance and Discordance Between Patient-reported Remission, Patient-reported Outcomes, and Physician Global Assessment
    Kamp, Kendra J.
    Hawes, Stephen E.
    Tse, Chung Sang
    Singh, Siddharth
    Dang, Nhu
    Oberai, Ridhima
    Weaver, S. Alandra
    Melmed, Gil Y.
    Siegel, Corey A.
    van Deen, Welmoed K.
    INFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASES, 2023, 29 (08) : 1255 - 1262
  • [43] Patient-Reported Outcomes for Fractures of the Acetabulum: A Comparison Between Patient-Reported Outcomes Information System and Traditional Instruments
    Schumaier, Adam P.
    Matar, Robert N.
    Ramalingam, Wendy G.
    Archdeacon, Michael T.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGEONS, 2022, 30 (02) : 71 - 78
  • [44] Author Reply to "Regarding 'No Difference in Complication Rates or Patient-Reported Outcomes Between Bone-Patellar Tendon- Bone and Quadriceps Tendon Autograft for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction"'
    Hogan, Daniel W.
    Burch, M. Benjamin
    Rund, Joseph M.
    Geeslin, Derek W.
    Ma, Richard
    Gray, Aaron F.
    Chu, Constance R.
    Ray, Taylor E.
    Pullen, W. Michael
    Sherman, Seth L.
    ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2021, 38 (06): : 1761 - 1763
  • [45] Patient-reported Outcomes in Facial Reconstruction: Assessment of FACE-Q Scales and Predictors of Satisfaction
    Elegbede, Adekunle
    Mermulla, Sara
    Diaconu, Silviu C.
    McNichols, Colton
    Liang, Yuanyuan
    Liang, Fan
    Rasko, Yvonne M.
    Grant, Michael P.
    Nam, Arthur J.
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY-GLOBAL OPEN, 2018, 6 (12)
  • [46] Biceps tenotomy versus tenodesis: patient-reported outcomes and satisfaction
    Aflatooni, Justin O.
    Meeks, Brett D.
    Froehle, Andrew W.
    Bonner, Kevin F.
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND RESEARCH, 2020, 15 (01)
  • [47] Biceps tenotomy versus tenodesis: patient-reported outcomes and satisfaction
    Justin O. Aflatooni
    Brett D. Meeks
    Andrew W. Froehle
    Kevin F. Bonner
    Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, 15
  • [48] Patient-Reported Outcomes (Pros) and Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (Proms)
    Weldring, Theresa
    Smith, Sheree M. S.
    HEALTH SERVICES INSIGHTS, 2013, 6 : 61 - 68
  • [49] Relationship Between Patient-reported Outcomes of Elective Surgery and Hospital and Consultant Volume
    Varagunam, Mira
    Hutchings, Andrew
    Black, Nick
    MEDICAL CARE, 2015, 53 (04) : 310 - 316
  • [50] The relationship between frailty and Patient-Reported Outcomes in elderly patients with stable asthma
    Kusunose, Masaaki
    Sanda, Ryo
    Narita, Ayumi
    Nishimura, Koichi
    EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL, 2019, 54