The Relationship Between Patient-Reported Outcomes and Patient Satisfaction With Ligament Reconstruction Tendon Interposition

被引:0
|
作者
Rogers, Miranda J. [1 ]
Ou, Zhining [2 ]
Clawson, Jordan W. [1 ]
Presson, Angela P. [2 ]
Stockburger, Christopher L. [3 ]
Kazmers, Nikolas H. [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Utah, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Salt Lake City, UT USA
[2] Univ Utah, Div Epidemiol, Dept Internal Med, Salt Lake City, UT USA
[3] Orthopaed & Spine Ctr Rockies, Ft Collins, CO USA
[4] Univ Utah, Dept Orthopaed, 590 Wakara Way, Salt Lake City, UT 84108 USA
来源
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Improvement; ligament reconstruction tendon interposition; LRTI; mid-term out-comes; PROMIS UE CAT; QuickDASH/QDASH; satisfaction; CLINICALLY IMPORTANT DIFFERENCE; BASAL JOINT ARTHRITIS; PREOPERATIVE EXPECTATIONS; SURGICAL-MANAGEMENT; THUMB; CARE; HAND; OSTEOARTHRITIS; TRAPEZIECTOMY; QUALITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jhsa.2023.08.010
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose Achieving the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) on an outcomes instrument and reporting satisfaction with surgical outcomes are not equivalent. We hypothesized that improvement exceeding the QuickDASH and PROMIS UE CAT MCID is associated with a greater likelihood of reporting satisfaction with ligament reconstruction tendon interposition (LRTI) treatment. Our secondary hypothesis was that a subset of patients failing to meet MCID would still be satisfied.Methods Patients >= 1 year after LRTI at one academic tertiary institution were included. QuickDASH and UE CAT v1.2 scores were obtained before and after surgery. Postoperative satisfaction and levels of improvement in pain and function were also obtained.Results A total of 93 patients completed the QuickDASH, and of those, 90 also completed the UE CAT. At a mean of 2.6 +/- 1.0 years after surgery, QuickDASH and UE CAT score improvement exceeded the previously published MCID estimates of 8.8 and 4.8. Although 90% (84/93) of the patients reported satisfaction, only 85% (72/93) and 72% (59/90) achieved MCID on the QuickDASH and UE CAT, respectively. Using the MCID estimate of 8.8, 96% (72/75) of the patients meeting the MCID were satisfied with their treatment. Those failing to achieve MCID reported significantly less physical function and pain improvement; however, most were satisfied nonetheless (68% [13/19] for QuickDASH, 77% [23/30] for UE CAT).Conclusions Achieving published MCID thresholds on the QuickDASH and PROMIS UE CAT v1.2 was predictive of patients reporting general satisfaction with their LRTI outcome >1 year after surgery. Most patients failing to achieve MCID still reported satisfaction with their LRTI. Achieving MCID thresholds alone should not be used as a surrogate for patient satisfaction with their treatment. Patient satisfaction is a complicated construct that is potentially very different from that of high-quality care.
引用
收藏
页码:1218 / 1228
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Regarding "No Difference in Complication Rates or Patient-Reported Outcomes Between Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone and Quadriceps Tendon Autograft for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction"
    Lamplot, Joseph D.
    ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2022, 38 (06): : 1758 - 1761
  • [22] Trends in Patient-Reported Outcomes After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review
    Berk, Alexander N.
    Piasecki, Dana P.
    Fleischli, James E.
    Trofa, David P.
    Saltzman, Bryan M.
    ORTHOPAEDIC JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2023, 11 (05)
  • [23] Quadriceps Tendon Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in Skeletally Immature Patients: 3-Year Clinical and Patient-Reported Outcomes
    Cordasco, Frank A.
    Perea, Sofia Hidalgo
    Uppstrom, Tyler J.
    Chipman, Danielle E.
    Pascual-Leone, Nicolas
    Aitchison, Alexandra Hunter
    Lijesen, Emilie
    Asaro, Lori Ann
    Green, Daniel W.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2024, 52 (09): : 2230 - 2236
  • [24] Ligament Reconstruction and Tendon Interposition
    Johnson, Julie
    Goitz, Robert J.
    OPERATIVE TECHNIQUES IN ORTHOPAEDICS, 2018, 28 (01) : 16 - 22
  • [25] ASSOCIATIONS BETWEEN GAIT MECHANICS AND PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOMES AT 7 YEARS AFTER ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT RECONSTRUCTION
    Magony, Richard
    Bryant, Dianne
    Getgood, Alan
    Thornton, Jane
    Pamukoff, Derek N.
    OSTEOARTHRITIS AND CARTILAGE, 2024, 32 : S168 - S169
  • [26] Use of Patient-Reported Outcomes and Satisfaction for Quality Assessments
    Ehlers, Anne P.
    Khor, Sara
    Cizik, Amy M.
    Leveque, Jean-Christophe A.
    Shonnard, Neal S.
    Oskouian, Rod J., Jr.
    Flum, David R.
    Lavallee, Danielle C.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MANAGED CARE, 2017, 23 (10): : 618 - 622
  • [27] Patient-reported outcomes following interposition arthroplasty of the basal joint of the thumb
    Jorgensen, Rasmus Wejnold
    Odgaard, Anders
    Flensted, Frederik
    Daugaard, Henrik
    Jensen, Claus Hjorth
    JOURNAL OF PLASTIC SURGERY AND HAND SURGERY, 2021, 55 (02) : 105 - 110
  • [28] Commentary: Uncertainty in the Relationship Between Sagittal Alignment and Patient-Reported Outcomes
    Pennington, Zach
    Sciubba, Daniel M.
    NEUROSURGERY, 2020, 86 (04) : E383 - E384
  • [29] Is There a Relationship Between Patient-Reported Satisfaction and Persistence on Overactive Bladder Syndrome Pharmacotherapy?
    Tran, Alexis M.
    Reis, Renata
    Iyer, Shilpa
    Botros, Carolyn
    Goldberg, Roger P.
    Sand, Peter K.
    Botros, Sylvia M.
    FEMALE PELVIC MEDICINE AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2018, 24 (03): : 237 - 240
  • [30] Patient-reported outcomes
    Garratt, Andrew
    TIDSSKRIFT FOR DEN NORSKE LAEGEFORENING, 2015, 135 (07) : 668 - 668