Robotic versus laparoscopic surgery for hiatal hernia repair: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis

被引:8
|
作者
Ma, Longyin [1 ]
Luo, Heng [1 ]
Kou, Shien [3 ]
Gao, Zhenguo [1 ]
Bai, Dan [1 ]
Qin, Xiangzhi [1 ]
Ouchi, Takahiro [2 ]
Gong, Lei [1 ]
Hu, Jiani [2 ]
Tian, Yunhong [1 ]
机构
[1] North Sichuan Med Coll Univ, Affiliated Nanchong Cent Hosp, Dept Gen Surg, Nanchong 637000, Sichuan, Peoples R China
[2] Wayne State Univ, Dept Radiol, Detroit, MI 48201 USA
[3] North Sichuan Med Coll, Sch Med Clin, Nanchong 637000, Sichuan, Peoples R China
关键词
Hiatal hernia; Laparoscopic; Robotic; Complications; DIAGNOSIS; FUTURE;
D O I
10.1007/s11701-023-01636-5
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
The number of robotic hiatal hernia repairs (RHHR) is increasing. However, the superiority of this minimally invasive approach remains controversial. The aim of this study was to evaluate the available literature reporting on outcomes of RHHR compared with laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair (LHHR) in adult patients. The design of this systematic review was developed using the guidelines of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). Web of Science, PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases were searched. Identified publications were reviewed independently by two authors. High heterogeneity was further explored through sensitivity analysis. The primary endpoint was the development of postoperative complications. Secondary endpoints included operation time, intraoperative complications, 30 day readmission rates and length of stay. The analysis was performed using Stata 17.0 software. A total of 7 studies totaling 10078 patients met the inclusion criteria. Five studies included postoperative complications. The postoperative complications rate was 4.25% (302/7111) in the LHHR group, and 3.49% (38/1088) in the RHHR group. Postoperative complications significantly decreased after RHHR compared with LHHR (OR 0.52; 95% CI 0.36 to 0.75, P = 0.000). Three studies involving 2176 patients reported length of hospital stay. In the three studies, the mean Length of hospital stay was 3.2 days in the RHHR group, and 4.2 days in the LHHR group. Length of hospital stay was decreased by a mean of 0.68 days for RHHR compared with LHHR (WMD, - 0.68 days; 95% CI - 1.32 to - 0.03, P = 0.02). There was no significant difference between the RHHR group and the LHHR group regarding operative time, intraoperative complications, and 30 day readmission (P > 0.05). Our research shows that RHHR may be the better option, as the approach decreases postoperative complications and length of hospital stay.
引用
收藏
页码:1879 / 1890
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Laparoscopic versus open umbilical or paraumbilical hernia repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Hajibandeh, S.
    Hajibandeh, S.
    Sreh, A.
    Subar, D.
    Jones, L.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2017, 104 : 56 - 56
  • [22] 'Mesh hiatal hernioplasty' versus 'suture cruroplasty' in laparoscopic para-oesophageal hernia surgery; a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Sathasivam, Rajeev
    Bussa, Gopinath
    Viswanath, Yirupaiahgari
    Obuobi, Reece-Bolton
    Gill, Talvinder
    Reddy, Anil
    Shanmugam, Venkat
    Gilliam, Andy
    Thambi, Prem
    [J]. ASIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2019, 42 (01) : 53 - 60
  • [23] Laparoscopic Hernia Repair with the Extraperitoneal Approach versus Open Hernia Repair in Pediatric Inguinal Hernia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Huang, Fu-Huan
    Cheng, Po-Lung
    Hou, Wen-Hsuan
    Duh, Yih-Cherng
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2022, 11 (02)
  • [24] Robotic versus laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: a systematic review
    Imsirovic, Anja
    Bagga, Rahul
    Khan, Mansoor
    Singh, Krishna
    Sains, Parv
    Sajid, Muhammad S.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2021, 108
  • [25] SAFETY AND EFFICACY OF CONCOMITANT LAPAROSCOPIC HIATAL HERNIA REPAIR WITH TRANSORAL INCISIONLESS FUNDOPLICATION: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS
    Ramai, Daryl
    Smith, Eric
    Haider, Salman
    Chandan, Saurabh
    Dhindsa, Banreet
    Dhaliwal, Amaninder
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2023, 97 (06) : AB1070 - AB1070
  • [26] Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Adrenalectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Brandao, Luis Felipe
    Autorino, Riccardo
    Laydner, Humberto
    Haber, Georges-Pascal
    Ouzaid, Idir
    De Sio, Marco
    Perdona, Sisto
    Stein, Robert J.
    Porpiglia, Francesco
    Kaouk, Jihad H.
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2014, 65 (06) : 1154 - 1161
  • [27] Laparoscopic versus Robotic Hepatectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Aboudou, Taslim
    Li, Meixuan
    Zhang, Zeliang
    Wang, Zhengfeng
    Li, Yanfei
    Feng, Lufang
    Chu, Xiajing
    Chen, Nan
    Zhou, Wence
    Yang, Kehu
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2022, 11 (19)
  • [28] Robotic versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Lee, Seon Heui
    Lim, Sungwon
    Kim, Jin Hee
    Lee, Kil Yeon
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGICAL TREATMENT AND RESEARCH, 2015, 89 (04) : 190 - 201
  • [29] Robotic versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Sun, Xi-Yu
    Xu, Lai
    Lu, Jun-Yang
    Zhang, Guan-Nan
    [J]. MINIMALLY INVASIVE THERAPY & ALLIED TECHNOLOGIES, 2019, 28 (03) : 135 - 142
  • [30] A systematic review and meta-analysis of laparoscopic versus robotic rectal surgery with primary anastomosis
    Rubinkiewicz, Mateusz
    Witowski, Jan
    Zbroja, Karolina
    Rozmus, Kamil
    Krzywon, Julia
    Truszkiewicz, Katarzyna
    [J]. POLISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2020, 92 (01) : 5 - 10