Robotic versus laparoscopic surgery for hiatal hernia repair: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis

被引:8
|
作者
Ma, Longyin [1 ]
Luo, Heng [1 ]
Kou, Shien [3 ]
Gao, Zhenguo [1 ]
Bai, Dan [1 ]
Qin, Xiangzhi [1 ]
Ouchi, Takahiro [2 ]
Gong, Lei [1 ]
Hu, Jiani [2 ]
Tian, Yunhong [1 ]
机构
[1] North Sichuan Med Coll Univ, Affiliated Nanchong Cent Hosp, Dept Gen Surg, Nanchong 637000, Sichuan, Peoples R China
[2] Wayne State Univ, Dept Radiol, Detroit, MI 48201 USA
[3] North Sichuan Med Coll, Sch Med Clin, Nanchong 637000, Sichuan, Peoples R China
关键词
Hiatal hernia; Laparoscopic; Robotic; Complications; DIAGNOSIS; FUTURE;
D O I
10.1007/s11701-023-01636-5
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
The number of robotic hiatal hernia repairs (RHHR) is increasing. However, the superiority of this minimally invasive approach remains controversial. The aim of this study was to evaluate the available literature reporting on outcomes of RHHR compared with laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair (LHHR) in adult patients. The design of this systematic review was developed using the guidelines of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). Web of Science, PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases were searched. Identified publications were reviewed independently by two authors. High heterogeneity was further explored through sensitivity analysis. The primary endpoint was the development of postoperative complications. Secondary endpoints included operation time, intraoperative complications, 30 day readmission rates and length of stay. The analysis was performed using Stata 17.0 software. A total of 7 studies totaling 10078 patients met the inclusion criteria. Five studies included postoperative complications. The postoperative complications rate was 4.25% (302/7111) in the LHHR group, and 3.49% (38/1088) in the RHHR group. Postoperative complications significantly decreased after RHHR compared with LHHR (OR 0.52; 95% CI 0.36 to 0.75, P = 0.000). Three studies involving 2176 patients reported length of hospital stay. In the three studies, the mean Length of hospital stay was 3.2 days in the RHHR group, and 4.2 days in the LHHR group. Length of hospital stay was decreased by a mean of 0.68 days for RHHR compared with LHHR (WMD, - 0.68 days; 95% CI - 1.32 to - 0.03, P = 0.02). There was no significant difference between the RHHR group and the LHHR group regarding operative time, intraoperative complications, and 30 day readmission (P > 0.05). Our research shows that RHHR may be the better option, as the approach decreases postoperative complications and length of hospital stay.
引用
收藏
页码:1879 / 1890
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Mesh in laparoscopic large hiatal hernia repair: a systematic review of the literature
    Furnee, Edgar
    Hazebroek, Eric
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2013, 27 (11): : 3998 - 4008
  • [12] Mesh in laparoscopic large hiatal hernia repair: a systematic review of the literature
    Edgar Furnée
    Eric Hazebroek
    [J]. Surgical Endoscopy, 2013, 27 : 3998 - 4008
  • [13] A systematic review and meta-analysis of mesh vs suture cruroplasty in laparoscopic large hiatal hernia repair
    Tam, Vernissia
    Winger, Daniel G.
    Nason, Katie S.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2016, 211 (01): : 226 - 238
  • [14] Systematic review of robotic ventral hernia repair with meta-analysis
    Tran, Elisa
    Sun, Jing
    Gundara, Justin
    [J]. ANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2024, 94 (1-2) : 37 - 46
  • [15] Innovation in endocrine surgery: robotic versus laparoscopic adrenalectomy. Meta-analysis and systematic literature review
    Agrusa, Antonino
    Romano, Giorgio
    Navarra, Giuseppe
    Conzo, Giovanni
    Pantuso, Gianni
    Di Buono, Giuseppe
    Citarrella, Roberto
    Galia, Massimo
    Lo Monte, Attilio
    Cucinella, Gaspare
    Gulotta, Gaspare
    [J]. ONCOTARGET, 2017, 8 (60) : 102392 - 102400
  • [16] Robotic inguinal hernia repair: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Qabbani, Amjad
    Aboumarzouk, Omar M.
    ElBakry, Tamer
    Al-Ansari, Abdulla
    Elakkad, Mohamed S.
    [J]. ANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2021, 91 (11) : 2277 - 2287
  • [17] Laparoscopic versus open umbilical or paraumbilical hernia repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Hajibandeh, S.
    Hajibandeh, S.
    Sreh, A.
    Khan, A.
    Subar, D.
    Jones, L.
    [J]. HERNIA, 2017, 21 (06) : 905 - 916
  • [18] Laparoscopic versus open umbilical or paraumbilical hernia repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    S. Hajibandeh
    S. Hajibandeh
    A. Sreh
    A. Khan
    D. Subar
    L. Jones
    [J]. Hernia, 2017, 21 : 905 - 916
  • [19] Laparoscopic Versus Open Incisional and Ventral Hernia Repair: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Yanyan Zhang
    Haiyang Zhou
    Yunsheng Chai
    Can Cao
    Kaizhou Jin
    Zhiqian Hu
    [J]. World Journal of Surgery, 2014, 38 : 2233 - 2240
  • [20] Laparoscopic Versus Open Incisional and Ventral Hernia Repair: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Zhang, Yanyan
    Zhou, Haiyang
    Chai, Yunsheng
    Cao, Can
    Jin, Kaizhou
    Hu, Zhiqian
    [J]. WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2014, 38 (09) : 2233 - 2240