Robotic versus laparoscopic surgery for hiatal hernia repair: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis

被引:8
|
作者
Ma, Longyin [1 ]
Luo, Heng [1 ]
Kou, Shien [3 ]
Gao, Zhenguo [1 ]
Bai, Dan [1 ]
Qin, Xiangzhi [1 ]
Ouchi, Takahiro [2 ]
Gong, Lei [1 ]
Hu, Jiani [2 ]
Tian, Yunhong [1 ]
机构
[1] North Sichuan Med Coll Univ, Affiliated Nanchong Cent Hosp, Dept Gen Surg, Nanchong 637000, Sichuan, Peoples R China
[2] Wayne State Univ, Dept Radiol, Detroit, MI 48201 USA
[3] North Sichuan Med Coll, Sch Med Clin, Nanchong 637000, Sichuan, Peoples R China
关键词
Hiatal hernia; Laparoscopic; Robotic; Complications; DIAGNOSIS; FUTURE;
D O I
10.1007/s11701-023-01636-5
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
The number of robotic hiatal hernia repairs (RHHR) is increasing. However, the superiority of this minimally invasive approach remains controversial. The aim of this study was to evaluate the available literature reporting on outcomes of RHHR compared with laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair (LHHR) in adult patients. The design of this systematic review was developed using the guidelines of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). Web of Science, PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases were searched. Identified publications were reviewed independently by two authors. High heterogeneity was further explored through sensitivity analysis. The primary endpoint was the development of postoperative complications. Secondary endpoints included operation time, intraoperative complications, 30 day readmission rates and length of stay. The analysis was performed using Stata 17.0 software. A total of 7 studies totaling 10078 patients met the inclusion criteria. Five studies included postoperative complications. The postoperative complications rate was 4.25% (302/7111) in the LHHR group, and 3.49% (38/1088) in the RHHR group. Postoperative complications significantly decreased after RHHR compared with LHHR (OR 0.52; 95% CI 0.36 to 0.75, P = 0.000). Three studies involving 2176 patients reported length of hospital stay. In the three studies, the mean Length of hospital stay was 3.2 days in the RHHR group, and 4.2 days in the LHHR group. Length of hospital stay was decreased by a mean of 0.68 days for RHHR compared with LHHR (WMD, - 0.68 days; 95% CI - 1.32 to - 0.03, P = 0.02). There was no significant difference between the RHHR group and the LHHR group regarding operative time, intraoperative complications, and 30 day readmission (P > 0.05). Our research shows that RHHR may be the better option, as the approach decreases postoperative complications and length of hospital stay.
引用
收藏
页码:1879 / 1890
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Robotic versus laparoscopic surgery for hiatal hernia repair: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis
    Longyin Ma
    Heng Luo
    Shien Kou
    Zhenguo Gao
    Dan Bai
    Xiangzhi Qin
    Takahiro Ouchi
    Lei Gong
    Jiani Hu
    Yunhong Tian
    [J]. Journal of Robotic Surgery, 2023, 17 : 1879 - 1890
  • [2] Robotic versus laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis
    Leonardo Solaini
    Davide Cavaliere
    Andrea Avanzolini
    Giuseppe Rocco
    Giorgio Ercolani
    [J]. Journal of Robotic Surgery, 2022, 16 : 775 - 781
  • [3] Robotic versus laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis
    Solaini, Leonardo
    Cavaliere, Davide
    Avanzolini, Andrea
    Rocco, Giuseppe
    Ercolani, Giorgio
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ROBOTIC SURGERY, 2022, 16 (04) : 775 - 781
  • [4] Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic incisional hernia repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    J. A. R. Peñafiel
    G. Valladares
    Amanda Cyntia Lima Fonseca Rodrigues
    P. Avelino
    L. Amorim
    L. Teixeira
    G. Brandao
    F. Rosa
    [J]. Hernia, 2024, 28 : 321 - 332
  • [5] Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic incisional hernia repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Penafiel, J. A. R.
    Valladares, G.
    Rodrigues, Amanda Cyntia Lima Fonseca
    Avelino, P.
    Amorim, L.
    Teixeira, L.
    Brandao, G.
    Rosa, F.
    [J]. HERNIA, 2024, 28 (02) : 321 - 332
  • [6] Robotic surgery versus Laparoscopic surgery for anti-reflux and hiatal hernia surgery: a short-term outcomes and cost systematic literature review and meta‐analysis
    Diogo Gonçalves-Costa
    José Pedro Barbosa
    Rodrigo Quesado
    Vítor Lopes
    José Barbosa
    [J]. Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery, 409 (1)
  • [7] Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Bariatric Surgery: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Li, Kun
    Zou, Jianan
    Tang, Jianxiong
    Di, Jianzhong
    Han, Xiaodong
    Zhang, Pin
    [J]. OBESITY SURGERY, 2016, 26 (12) : 3031 - 3044
  • [8] Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Bariatric Surgery: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Kun Li
    Jianan Zou
    Jianxiong Tang
    Jianzhong Di
    Xiaodong Han
    Pin Zhang
    [J]. Obesity Surgery, 2016, 26 : 3031 - 3044
  • [9] Robotic surgery for inguinal and ventral hernia repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    de'Angelis, Nicola
    Schena, Carlo Alberto
    Moszkowicz, David
    Kuperas, Cyril
    Fara, Regis
    Gaujoux, Sebastien
    Gillion, Jean-Francois
    Gronnier, Caroline
    Loriau, Jerome
    Mathonnet, Muriel
    Oberlin, Olivier
    Perez, Manuela
    Renard, Yohann
    Romain, Benoit
    Passot, Guillaume
    Pessaux, Patrick
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2024, 38 (01): : 24 - 46
  • [10] Robotic surgery for inguinal and ventral hernia repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Nicola de’Angelis
    Carlo Alberto Schena
    David Moszkowicz
    Cyril Kuperas
    Régis Fara
    Sébastien Gaujoux
    Jean-François Gillion
    Caroline Gronnier
    Jérôme Loriau
    Muriel Mathonnet
    Olivier Oberlin
    Manuela Perez
    Yohann Renard
    Benoît Romain
    Guillaume Passot
    Patrick Pessaux
    [J]. Surgical Endoscopy, 2024, 38 : 24 - 46