Different definitions of feeding intolerance and their associations with outcomes of critically ill adults receiving enteral nutrition: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:9
|
作者
Li, Jianbo [1 ]
Wang, Lijie [1 ]
Zhang, Huan [1 ]
Zou, Tongjuan [1 ]
Kang, Yan [1 ]
He, Wei [2 ]
Xu, Yuan [3 ]
Yin, Wanhong [1 ]
机构
[1] Sichuan Univ, Dept Crit Care Med, West China Hosp, 37 Guo Xue Xiang St, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan, Peoples R China
[2] Capital Med Univ, Beijing Tongren Hosp, Dept Crit Care Med, Beijing 100730, Peoples R China
[3] Tsinghua Univ, Beijing Tsinghua Chunggung Hosp, Dept Crit Care Med, 168 Litang Rd, Beijing 102218, Peoples R China
关键词
Feeding intolerance; Definitions; Critically ill adults; Enteral nutrition; MECHANICALLY VENTILATED PATIENTS; GASTRIC RESIDUAL VOLUME; INTENSIVE-CARE; RISK-FACTORS; WORKING GROUP; PREVALENCE; GUIDELINES; HETEROGENEITY; TOLERANCE; CERTAINTY;
D O I
10.1186/s40560-023-00674-3
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
BackgroundA unified clinical definition of feeding intolerance (FI) is urged for better management of enteral nutrition (EN) in critically ill patients. We aimed to identify optimum clinical FI definitions based on reported evidence.MethodsWe searched clinical studies comparing FI with non-FI with a clear definition, summarized the evidence by random-effect meta-analyses, and rated the certainty of evidence by the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation frameworks.ResultsFive thousand five hundred twenty-five records were identified, of which 26 eligible studies enrolled 25,189 adult patients. Most patient-centered outcomes were associated with FI overall. Low to very low certainty evidence established FI defined as large gastric residual volume (GRV) & GE; 250 & PLUSMN; 50 mL combined with any other gastrointestinal symptoms (GIS) had a significant association with high mortalities in particular all-cause hospital mortality (odds ratio [OR] 1.90, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.40-2.57), the incidence of pneumonia (OR 1.54, 95% CI 1.13-2.09) and prolonged length of hospital stay (mean difference 4.20, 95% CI 2.08-6.32), with a moderate hospital prevalence (41.49%, 95% CI 31.61-51.38%). 3-day enteral feeding (EF) delivered percentage < 80% had a moderate hospital prevalence (38.23%, 95% CI 24.88-51.58) but a marginally significant association with all-cause hospital mortality (OR 1.90, 95% CI 1.03-3.50).ConclusionsIn critically ill adult patients receiving EN, the large-GRV-centered GIS to define FI seemed to be superior to 3-day EF-insufficiency in terms of both close associations with all-cause hospital mortality and acceptable hospital prevalence (Registered PROSPERO: CRD42022326273).Trial registration: The protocol for this review and meta-analysis was registered with PROSPERO: CRD42022326273. Registered 10 May 2022.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Measurements of enteral feeding intolerance in critically ill children: a scoping review
    Li, Yan
    Fu, Cong-Hui
    Ju, Min-Jie
    Liu, Ji
    Yang, Xiao-Ya
    Xu, Ting-Ting
    FRONTIERS IN PEDIATRICS, 2024, 12
  • [42] Hyperphosphatemia and Outcomes in Critically Ill Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Zheng, Wen-He
    Yao, Yan
    Zhou, Hua
    Xu, Yuan
    Huang, Hui-Bin
    FRONTIERS IN MEDICINE, 2022, 9
  • [43] Enteral versus parenteral nutrition in critically ill patients: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Gunnar Elke
    Arthur R. H. van Zanten
    Margot Lemieux
    Michele McCall
    Khursheed N. Jeejeebhoy
    Matthias Kott
    Xuran Jiang
    Andrew G. Day
    Daren K. Heyland
    Critical Care, 20
  • [44] Erratum to: Comparisons between intragastric and small intestinal delivery of enteral nutrition in the critically ill: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Adam M Deane
    Rupinder Dhaliwal
    Andrew G Day
    Emma J Ridley
    Andrew R Davies
    Daren K Heyland
    Critical Care, 18 (4):
  • [45] Enteral versus parenteral nutrition in critically ill patients: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Elke, Gunnar
    van Zanten, Arthur R. H.
    Lemieux, Margot
    McCall, Michele
    Jeejeebhoy, Khursheed N.
    Kott, Matthias
    Jiang, Xuran
    Day, Andrew G.
    Heyland, Daren K.
    CRITICAL CARE, 2016, 20
  • [46] Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis investigating the impact of continuous versus intermittent enteral feeding in critically ill patients
    Acharya, Lydia S.
    Clayton, Anne M.
    Mbuagbaw, Lawrence
    Oczkowski, Simon
    Rochwerg, Bram
    Tsang, Jennifer
    Campbell, Kaitryn
    Dearness, Karin
    Dionne, Joanna C.
    SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2024, 13 (01)
  • [47] The impact of implementation of an enteral feeding protocol on the improvement of enteral nutrition in critically ill adults
    Kim, Seoung-Hyun
    Park, Chi-Min
    Seo, Jeong-Meen
    Choi, Mingew
    Lee, Dae-Sang
    Chang, Dong Kyung
    Rha, Miyong
    Yu, Soyoung
    Lee, Seonhye
    Kim, Eunmee
    Cho, YoungYun
    ASIA PACIFIC JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NUTRITION, 2017, 26 (01) : 27 - 35
  • [48] Feeding intolerance score in critically ill patients with enteral nutrition: A post hoc analysis of a prospective study
    Lin, Jiajia
    Liu, Yang
    Ke, Lu
    Li, Gang
    Lv, Cheng
    Zhou, Jing
    Ye, Bo
    Li, Baiqiang
    Yang, Qi
    Tong, Zhihui
    Li, Weiqin
    Li, Jieshou
    NUTRITION IN CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2022, 37 (04) : 869 - 877
  • [49] Enteral nutrition in critically ill adults: Literature review of protocols
    Jordan, Elizabeth A.
    Moore, Shelley C.
    NURSING IN CRITICAL CARE, 2020, 25 (01) : 24 - 30
  • [50] Effect of Supplemental Parenteral Nutrition Versus Enteral Nutrition Alone on Clinical Outcomes in Critically Ill Adult Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Alsharif, Dalal J.
    Alsharif, Farah J.
    Aljuraiban, Ghadeer S.
    Abulmeaty, Mahmoud M. A.
    NUTRIENTS, 2020, 12 (10) : 1 - 16