Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis investigating the impact of continuous versus intermittent enteral feeding in critically ill patients

被引:0
|
作者
Acharya, Lydia S. [1 ]
Clayton, Anne M. [2 ]
Mbuagbaw, Lawrence [2 ,3 ]
Oczkowski, Simon [2 ]
Rochwerg, Bram [2 ]
Tsang, Jennifer [2 ]
Campbell, Kaitryn [3 ]
Dearness, Karin [3 ]
Dionne, Joanna C. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ottawa, Fac Hlth Sci, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[2] McMaster Univ, Dept Hlth Res Methods Evidence & Impact, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[3] St Josephs Healthcare Hamilton, Hamilton, ON, Canada
关键词
Diarrhea; Intermittent feeding; Continuous feeding; Bolus feeding; Intensive care unit; Enteral nutrition; Gastrointestinal system;
D O I
10.1186/s13643-024-02652-8
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
IntroductionEnteral nutrition (EN) is the recommended nutritional support in most critically ill populations. When given by feeding tube, EN may be administered either continuously or intermittently. It is unclear which approach is superior in reducing gastrointestinal complications-such as diarrhea-and meeting nutritional targets. The main objectives of this systematic review and meta-analysis are to (1) determine whether continuous or intermittent enteral nutrition is associated with higher incidence of adverse gastrointestinal outcomes, including diarrhea, and (2) determine which feeding modality is associated with reaching nutritional goals.Methods and analysisThis systematic review protocol is reported in accordance with guidelines from the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Protocols (PRISMA-P) statement. We will search MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and the World Health Organization (WHO) International Clinical Trials Registry (ICTRP) search portal for studies comparing continuous EN and intermittent EN in critically ill patients with no date or language restrictions. Studies will be screened, selected, and extracted independently and in duplicate. We will assess the risk-of-bias assessment using the Cochrane Collaboration's Risk of Bias (RoB) 2 tool. The primary outcome will include the incidence of diarrhea; secondary outcomes include other adverse GI outcomes (nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain, and constipation), as well as reaching nutritional goals, and length of ICU and hospital stay and mortality. We will pool data using a random-effects model and assess the certainty of the evidence for each outcome using Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) methodology.Ethics and disseminationEthics approval is not required for this study as no original data will be collected. We will disseminate results through peer-reviewed publication and conference presentations.Systematic review registrationPROSPERO CRD42022330118.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison of continuous versus intermittent enteral feeding in critically ill patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Heffernan, Aaron J.
    Talekar, C.
    Henain, M.
    Purcell, L.
    Palmer, M.
    White, H.
    [J]. CRITICAL CARE, 2022, 26 (01)
  • [2] Comparison of continuous versus intermittent enteral feeding in critically ill patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Aaron J. Heffernan
    C. Talekar
    M. Henain
    L. Purcell
    M. Palmer
    H. White
    [J]. Critical Care, 26
  • [3] Effects of intermittent feeding versus continuous feeding on enteral nutrition tolerance in critically ill patients A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis
    Li, Yuanli
    Yang, Jin
    Sun, Shunxia
    Huang, Juan
    Zhang, Aiguo
    Tang, Xiaoling
    [J]. MEDICINE, 2020, 99 (50) : E23528
  • [4] Bolus Versus Continuous Enteral Feeding for Critically Ill Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Abdelbaky, Ahmed M.
    Elmasry, Wael G.
    Awad, Ahmed H.
    [J]. CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2024, 16 (02)
  • [5] Continuous versus Intermittent Enteral Feeding in Critically Ill Children: A Systematic Review
    Theodoridis, Xenophon
    Chrysoula, Lydia
    Evripidou, Kleo
    Kalaitzopoulou, Ioustini
    Chourdakis, Michail
    [J]. NUTRIENTS, 2023, 15 (02)
  • [6] ASSESSING THE IMPACT OF CONTINUOUS VERSUS INTERMITTENT ENTERAL FEEDING IN CRITICALLY ILL PATIENTS
    Acharya, Lydia
    Clayton, Anne
    Rochwerg, Bram
    Oczkowski, Simon
    Mbuagbaw, Lawrence
    Tsang, Jennifer
    Dionne, Joanna
    [J]. CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2023, 51 (01) : 149 - 149
  • [7] The effect of intermittent versus continuous enteral feeding for critically ill patients: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Qu, Jing
    Xu, Xiaoya
    Xu, Chaobo
    Ding, Xuzhong
    Zhang, Kai
    Hu, Leshuang
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN NUTRITION, 2023, 10
  • [8] Feeding Intolerance in Critically Ill Patients with Enteral Nutrition: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review
    Xu, Jing
    Shi, Wenyu
    Xie, Liying
    Xu, Jing
    Bian, Lanzheng
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2024, 10 (01): : 7 - 15
  • [9] Systematic review and meta-analysis of the effectiveness of continuous vs intermittent enteral nutrition in critically ill adults
    Thong, Debbie
    Halim, Zakiah
    Chia, Joel
    Chua, Fionn
    Wong, Alvin
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PARENTERAL AND ENTERAL NUTRITION, 2022, 46 (06) : 1243 - 1257
  • [10] Continuous Infusion versus Intermittent Bolus Injection of Furosemide in Critically Ill Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Ng, Ka Ting
    Velayit, Aslinah
    Khoo, Delton Kah Yeang
    Ismail, Amirah Mohd
    Mansor, Marzida
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CARDIOTHORACIC AND VASCULAR ANESTHESIA, 2018, 32 (05) : 2303 - 2310