Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis investigating the impact of continuous versus intermittent enteral feeding in critically ill patients

被引:0
|
作者
Acharya, Lydia S. [1 ]
Clayton, Anne M. [2 ]
Mbuagbaw, Lawrence [2 ,3 ]
Oczkowski, Simon [2 ]
Rochwerg, Bram [2 ]
Tsang, Jennifer [2 ]
Campbell, Kaitryn [3 ]
Dearness, Karin [3 ]
Dionne, Joanna C. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ottawa, Fac Hlth Sci, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[2] McMaster Univ, Dept Hlth Res Methods Evidence & Impact, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[3] St Josephs Healthcare Hamilton, Hamilton, ON, Canada
关键词
Diarrhea; Intermittent feeding; Continuous feeding; Bolus feeding; Intensive care unit; Enteral nutrition; Gastrointestinal system;
D O I
10.1186/s13643-024-02652-8
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
IntroductionEnteral nutrition (EN) is the recommended nutritional support in most critically ill populations. When given by feeding tube, EN may be administered either continuously or intermittently. It is unclear which approach is superior in reducing gastrointestinal complications-such as diarrhea-and meeting nutritional targets. The main objectives of this systematic review and meta-analysis are to (1) determine whether continuous or intermittent enteral nutrition is associated with higher incidence of adverse gastrointestinal outcomes, including diarrhea, and (2) determine which feeding modality is associated with reaching nutritional goals.Methods and analysisThis systematic review protocol is reported in accordance with guidelines from the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Protocols (PRISMA-P) statement. We will search MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and the World Health Organization (WHO) International Clinical Trials Registry (ICTRP) search portal for studies comparing continuous EN and intermittent EN in critically ill patients with no date or language restrictions. Studies will be screened, selected, and extracted independently and in duplicate. We will assess the risk-of-bias assessment using the Cochrane Collaboration's Risk of Bias (RoB) 2 tool. The primary outcome will include the incidence of diarrhea; secondary outcomes include other adverse GI outcomes (nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain, and constipation), as well as reaching nutritional goals, and length of ICU and hospital stay and mortality. We will pool data using a random-effects model and assess the certainty of the evidence for each outcome using Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) methodology.Ethics and disseminationEthics approval is not required for this study as no original data will be collected. We will disseminate results through peer-reviewed publication and conference presentations.Systematic review registrationPROSPERO CRD42022330118.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] INTERMITTENT ENTERAL FEEDING AND GASTRIC COLONIZATION IN CRITICALLY ILL PATIENTS
    SPILKER, CA
    HINTHORN, DR
    PINGLETON, SK
    [J]. AMERICAN REVIEW OF RESPIRATORY DISEASE, 1993, 147 (04): : A200 - A200
  • [42] Efficacy of glutamine-enriched enteral feeding formulae in critically ill patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Mottaghi, Azadeh
    Yeganeh, Maryam Zarif
    Golzarand, Mahdieh
    Jambarsang, Sara
    Mirmiran, Parvin
    [J]. ASIA PACIFIC JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NUTRITION, 2016, 25 (03) : 504 - 512
  • [43] The impact of analgosedation on mortality and delirium in critically ill patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Wang, Cui-Ting
    Mao, Yong
    Zhao, Ling
    Ma, Bin
    [J]. INTENSIVE AND CRITICAL CARE NURSING, 2019, 54 : 7 - 14
  • [44] Impact of Ketamine on Analgosedative Consumption in Critically Ill Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Chan, Katalina
    Burry, Lisa D.
    Tse, Christopher
    Wunsch, Hannah
    De Castro, Charmaine
    Williamson, David R.
    [J]. ANNALS OF PHARMACOTHERAPY, 2022, 56 (10) : 1139 - 1158
  • [45] Assessment of melatonergics in prevention of delirium in critically ill patients A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis
    Zhu, Yibing
    Jiang, Zhiming
    Huang, Huibin
    Wang, Yang
    Zhang, Linlin
    Ren, Chao
    Yao, Yongming
    Li, Wei
    Du, Bin
    Xi, Xiuming
    [J]. MEDICINE, 2020, 99 (02)
  • [46] Impact of early ICU admission on outcome of critically ill and critically ill cancer patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Hourmant, Yannick
    Mailloux, Arnaud
    Valade, Sandrine
    Lemiale, Virginie
    Azoulay, Elie
    Darmon, Michael
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CRITICAL CARE, 2021, 61 : 82 - 88
  • [47] Enteral versus parenteral nutrition in critically ill patients with severe pancreatitis: a meta-analysis
    Yao, H.
    He, C.
    Deng, L.
    Liao, G.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NUTRITION, 2018, 72 (01) : 66 - 68
  • [48] Enteral versus parenteral nutrition in critically ill patients with severe pancreatitis: a meta-analysis
    H Yao
    C He
    L Deng
    G Liao
    [J]. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 2018, 72 : 66 - 68
  • [49] Impact of balanced versus unbalanced fluid resuscitation on clinical outcomes in critically ill children: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Lehr, Anab Rebecca
    Rached-d'Astous, Soha
    Parker, Melissa
    McIntyre, Lauralyn
    Sampson, Margaret
    Hamid, Jemila
    Menon, Kusum
    [J]. SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2019, 8 (01)
  • [50] Impact of balanced versus unbalanced fluid resuscitation on clinical outcomes in critically ill children: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Anab Rebecca Lehr
    Soha Rached-d’Astous
    Melissa Parker
    Lauralyn McIntyre
    Margaret Sampson
    Jemila Hamid
    Kusum Menon
    [J]. Systematic Reviews, 8