A fast POD prediction method for hydrogen leakage at different pressures

被引:8
|
作者
Chen, Guang [1 ]
Qi, Baojin [1 ]
Hu, Weipeng [1 ]
Zhang, Yonghai [1 ]
Wei, Jinjia [1 ]
机构
[1] Xi An Jiao Tong Univ, Sch Chem Engn & Technol, Xian 710049, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Hydrogen; Leakage; Underexpanded jets; Proper orthogonal decomposition; Interpolation; CFD; PROPER ORTHOGONAL DECOMPOSITION; REDUCED-ORDER MODEL; NAVIER-STOKES; UNINTENDED RELEASES; 2-LAYER MODEL; JETS; GAS; VALIDATION; DISPERSION; REDUCTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.09.282
中图分类号
O64 [物理化学(理论化学)、化学物理学];
学科分类号
070304 ; 081704 ;
摘要
The complexity of hydrogen leakage at different pressures leads to the challenge of developing a prediction method for both low pressure and supercritical pressure hydrogen leakage. In this paper, a reduced-order model (ROM) based on proper orthogonal decomposition (POD) is developed to rapidly predict the hydrogen dispersion caused by leakage in small holes at different pressures. The subsonic and underexpanded hydrogen jets are simulated and verified with experimental data. Numerical results of some pressures are collected as POD snapshots and POD interpolation methods are performed to predict the velocity and hydrogen concentration distributions at desired unsampled pressures. Different sample plans with different sampling intervals and sample numbers are investigated. POD-linear, POD-spline, and POD-RBF (radial basis function) interpolations are compared. The results show that the POD-linear and POD-spline methods can accurately predict the velocity and hydrogen fraction at different pressures, and both are better than the POD-RBF method. The relative errors in predicting the hydrogen mole fraction between the POD-linear and POD-spline methods and the simulation results are 2.26% and 2.37%, respectively. Best of all, the POD interpolation method proposed in this work significantly reduces the time required for prediction, costing only 3.3 ms.(c) 2023 Hydrogen Energy Publications LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1391 / 1404
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] ;A Fast Active Leakage Cancellation Method for UHF RFID Readers
    Kapucu, Kerem
    Pauli, Muriel
    Dehollain, Catherine
    2017 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON RFID (RFID), 2017,
  • [32] Experimental research on unconfined hydrogen explosion of different gas scale and the overpressure prediction method
    Zhou, Yonghao
    Li, Yanchao
    Gao, Wei
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2023, 48 (79) : 30985 - 30996
  • [33] A new method fast measure cryogenic vessel heat leakage
    Li, Zheng-Qing
    Li, Xiao-Jin
    Liu, Mo
    PROGRESS IN SUPERCONDUCTIVITY AND CRYOGENICS, 2020, 22 (01): : 24 - 28
  • [34] Prediction model of the flow properties inside a tube during hydrogen leakage
    Nagase, Yuri
    Sugiyama, Yuta
    Kubota, Shiro
    Saburi, Tei
    Matsuo, Akiko
    JOURNAL OF LOSS PREVENTION IN THE PROCESS INDUSTRIES, 2019, 62
  • [35] Assessment of different methods for the prediction of marine propellers induced pressures
    Gaggero, S.
    Tani, G.
    Villa, D.
    Viviani, M.
    Conti, F.
    Vaccaro, C.
    MARITIME TECHNOLOGY AND ENGINEERING 3, VOLS 1-2, 2016, : 269 - 278
  • [36] Prediction of swelling pressures of different types of bentonite in dilute solutions
    Liu, Longcheng
    COLLOIDS AND SURFACES A-PHYSICOCHEMICAL AND ENGINEERING ASPECTS, 2013, 434 : 303 - 318
  • [37] Analysis of Different POD Processing Methods for SPIV-Measurements in Compressor Cascade Tip Leakage Flow
    Shi, Lei
    Ma, Hongwei
    Wang, Lixiang
    ENERGIES, 2019, 12 (06)
  • [38] Prediction of a Mobile Solid State in Dense Hydrogen under High Pressures
    Geng, Hua Y.
    Wu, Q.
    Sun, Y.
    JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY LETTERS, 2017, 8 (01): : 223 - 228
  • [39] Brown's method on the same specimen at different pressures and in different gases
    Kwartin, S
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR PHYSIK, 1926, 38 (08): : 600 - 608
  • [40] Fast flow field prediction of pollutant leakage diffusion based on deep learning
    YunBo, Wan
    Zhong, Zhao
    Jie, Liu
    KuiJun, Zuo
    Yong, Zhang
    Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2024, 31 (36) : 49393 - 49412