Assessment of an effective quantitative model with multi-criteria decision-making method for sustainable campus

被引:1
|
作者
Aksoy, Onur [1 ]
Demir, Sara [1 ]
Ersoz, Nazli Deniz [1 ]
Gokkaya, Merve Dilman [1 ]
机构
[1] Bursa Tech Univ, Forest Fac, Landscape Architecture Dept, Bursa, Turkiye
关键词
Sustainable campus criteria; Climate change; Multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method; Analytic hierarchy process (AHP); Planting and structural campus components; UNIVERSITY; WATER; INDICATORS;
D O I
10.1007/s11356-024-32040-7
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Sustainability is a current topic in public open green spaces such as university campuses. In order to ensure the sustainability of the campus areas, it is necessary to determine the criteria for the sustainable campus landscape. Bursa Uludag University Gorukle Campus in Bursa was chosen as the study area in this research. The aim of the study is to identify suitable sustainable campus criteria with a focus on landscape and to prioritize appropriate sustainable campus strategies determined according to these criteria. In this context, first, field studies and literature research were carried out. Second, sustainable campus criteria were classified as criteria and section. The section was then divided into credit. All these credits were ranked according to their priorities. Analytic hierarchy process, one of the multi-criteria decision-making methods, was used while ranking. According to the result of the criteria, planting landscape components were determined to be more important than structural landscape components. Among the section, the transport category was found as the highest priority criterion. The use of vegetable wastes as compost was also determined as the most important criterion among all credits. The method and findings of this research may set an example for determining priorities of the sustainable campus criteria in Turkey and developing countries with a participatory management approach.
引用
收藏
页码:13230 / 13245
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method
    Rezaei, Jafar
    [J]. OMEGA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2015, 53 : 49 - 57
  • [32] Water Quality Assessment Based on Combined Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Method with Index Method
    Mladenovic-Ranisavljevic, Ivana I.
    Takic, Lj.
    Nikolic, D.
    [J]. WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT, 2018, 32 (07) : 2261 - 2276
  • [33] Water Quality Assessment Based on Combined Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Method with Index Method
    Ivana I. Mladenović-Ranisavljević
    Lj. Takić
    Đ. Nikolić
    [J]. Water Resources Management, 2018, 32 : 2261 - 2276
  • [34] Assessment of TEOG Examination Success: Topsis Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Method Practice
    Kazan, Halim
    Karaman, Engin
    Akcali, Burcay Yasar
    Sismanoglu, Elcin
    [J]. WORLD CONFERENCE ON TECHNOLOGY, INNOVATION AND ENTREPRENEURSHIP, 2015, : 915 - 924
  • [35] Assessment of urban surface performance of open spaces with multi-criteria decision-making method
    Serdar Yakut, Elif Safiye
    Cenani, Sehnaz
    Cagdas, Gulen
    [J]. MEGARON, 2022, 17 (04): : 658 - 672
  • [36] A fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making model for trigeneration system
    Wang, Jiang-Jiang
    Jing, You-Yin
    Zhang, Chun-Fa
    Shi, Guo-Hua
    Zhang, Xu-Tao
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2008, 36 (10) : 3823 - 3832
  • [37] A MODEL BASED ON INFLUENCE DIAGRAMS FOR MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION-MAKING
    Sedki, Karima
    Delcroix, Veronique
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE TOOLS, 2012, 21 (04)
  • [38] A Comprehensive Multi-Criteria Decision Making Model for Sustainable Material Selection Considering Life Cycle Assessment Method
    Ma, Fangwu
    Zhao, Ying
    Pu, Yongfeng
    Li, Jinhang
    [J]. IEEE ACCESS, 2018, 6 : 58338 - 58354
  • [39] Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Method for Sustainable Energy-Saving Retrofit Facade Solutions
    Egiluz, Ziortza
    Cuadrado, Jesus
    Kortazar, Andoni
    Marcos, Ignacio
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (23)
  • [40] Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Model to Support Landfill Prioritization: Methane Risk Assessment
    Marceta, Una
    Vujic, Bogdana
    Srdjevic, Zorica
    Mihajlovic, Visnja
    Radosav, Dragica
    [J]. POLISH JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES, 2021, 30 (02): : 1297 - 1306