Assessment of an effective quantitative model with multi-criteria decision-making method for sustainable campus

被引:1
|
作者
Aksoy, Onur [1 ]
Demir, Sara [1 ]
Ersoz, Nazli Deniz [1 ]
Gokkaya, Merve Dilman [1 ]
机构
[1] Bursa Tech Univ, Forest Fac, Landscape Architecture Dept, Bursa, Turkiye
关键词
Sustainable campus criteria; Climate change; Multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method; Analytic hierarchy process (AHP); Planting and structural campus components; UNIVERSITY; WATER; INDICATORS;
D O I
10.1007/s11356-024-32040-7
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Sustainability is a current topic in public open green spaces such as university campuses. In order to ensure the sustainability of the campus areas, it is necessary to determine the criteria for the sustainable campus landscape. Bursa Uludag University Gorukle Campus in Bursa was chosen as the study area in this research. The aim of the study is to identify suitable sustainable campus criteria with a focus on landscape and to prioritize appropriate sustainable campus strategies determined according to these criteria. In this context, first, field studies and literature research were carried out. Second, sustainable campus criteria were classified as criteria and section. The section was then divided into credit. All these credits were ranked according to their priorities. Analytic hierarchy process, one of the multi-criteria decision-making methods, was used while ranking. According to the result of the criteria, planting landscape components were determined to be more important than structural landscape components. Among the section, the transport category was found as the highest priority criterion. The use of vegetable wastes as compost was also determined as the most important criterion among all credits. The method and findings of this research may set an example for determining priorities of the sustainable campus criteria in Turkey and developing countries with a participatory management approach.
引用
收藏
页码:13230 / 13245
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Model to Choose the Best Option for Sustainable Construction Management
    Erdogan, Seyit Ali
    Saparauskas, Jonas
    Turskis, Zenonas
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2019, 11 (08)
  • [22] Evaluating multi-criteria decision-making in health technology assessment
    Kelley, Leah T.
    Egan, Rylan
    Stockley, Denise
    Johnson, Ana P.
    [J]. HEALTH POLICY AND TECHNOLOGY, 2018, 7 (03) : 310 - 317
  • [23] Multi-criteria decision-making methods for preliminary design of sustainable facades
    Moghtadernejad, Saviz
    Chouinard, Luc. E.
    Mirza, M. Saeed
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BUILDING ENGINEERING, 2018, 19 : 181 - 190
  • [24] An integrated fuzzy-rough multi-criteria group decision-making model for quantitative assessment of geoheritage resources
    Zorlu, Kuttusi
    Polat, Selahattin
    Yilmaz, Ali
    Dede, Volkan
    [J]. RESOURCES POLICY, 2024, 90
  • [25] MUPOM: A multi-criteria multi-period outranking method for decision-making in sustainable development context
    Frini, Anissa
    Ben Amor, Sarah
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REVIEW, 2019, 76 : 10 - 25
  • [26] THE MOMENT INTEGRATED SOLUTION METHOD IN MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION-MAKING
    Akan, Ercan
    Bayar, Sibel
    Elmas, Guldem
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING-THEORY APPLICATIONS AND PRACTICE, 2020, 27 (06): : 844 - 866
  • [27] APPLICATIONS OF WASPAS METHOD AS A MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION-MAKING TOOL
    Chakraborty, Shankar
    Zavadskas, Edmundas Kazimieras
    Antucheviciene, Jurgita
    [J]. ECONOMIC COMPUTATION AND ECONOMIC CYBERNETICS STUDIES AND RESEARCH, 2015, 49 (01): : 5 - 22
  • [28] Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method
    Rezaei, Jafar
    [J]. OMEGA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2015, 53 : 49 - 57
  • [29] A quantitative priority-based approach using a multi-criteria decision-making model for sustainable coastal city development
    Gokkaya, Merve Dilman
    Demir, Sara
    Aksoy, Onur
    Ersoz, Nazli Deniz
    [J]. ENVIRONMENT DEVELOPMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY, 2024,
  • [30] Water Quality Assessment Based on Combined Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Method with Index Method
    Mladenovic-Ranisavljevic, Ivana I.
    Takic, Lj.
    Nikolic, D.
    [J]. WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT, 2018, 32 (07) : 2261 - 2276