Assessment of an effective quantitative model with multi-criteria decision-making method for sustainable campus

被引:1
|
作者
Aksoy, Onur [1 ]
Demir, Sara [1 ]
Ersoz, Nazli Deniz [1 ]
Gokkaya, Merve Dilman [1 ]
机构
[1] Bursa Tech Univ, Forest Fac, Landscape Architecture Dept, Bursa, Turkiye
关键词
Sustainable campus criteria; Climate change; Multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method; Analytic hierarchy process (AHP); Planting and structural campus components; UNIVERSITY; WATER; INDICATORS;
D O I
10.1007/s11356-024-32040-7
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Sustainability is a current topic in public open green spaces such as university campuses. In order to ensure the sustainability of the campus areas, it is necessary to determine the criteria for the sustainable campus landscape. Bursa Uludag University Gorukle Campus in Bursa was chosen as the study area in this research. The aim of the study is to identify suitable sustainable campus criteria with a focus on landscape and to prioritize appropriate sustainable campus strategies determined according to these criteria. In this context, first, field studies and literature research were carried out. Second, sustainable campus criteria were classified as criteria and section. The section was then divided into credit. All these credits were ranked according to their priorities. Analytic hierarchy process, one of the multi-criteria decision-making methods, was used while ranking. According to the result of the criteria, planting landscape components were determined to be more important than structural landscape components. Among the section, the transport category was found as the highest priority criterion. The use of vegetable wastes as compost was also determined as the most important criterion among all credits. The method and findings of this research may set an example for determining priorities of the sustainable campus criteria in Turkey and developing countries with a participatory management approach.
引用
收藏
页码:13230 / 13245
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Assessment of an effective quantitative model with multi-criteria decision-making method for sustainable campus
    Onur Aksoy
    Sara Demir
    Nazli Deniz Ersoz
    Merve Dilman Gokkaya
    [J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2024, 31 : 13230 - 13245
  • [2] Multi-criteria decision-making for sustainable metropolitan cities assessment
    Carli, Raffaele
    Dotoli, Mariagrazia
    Pellegrino, Roberta
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2018, 226 : 46 - 61
  • [3] Multi-criteria decision-making system for sustainable building assessment/certification
    Medineckiene, M.
    Zavadskas, E. K.
    Bjork, F.
    Turskis, Z.
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF CIVIL AND MECHANICAL ENGINEERING, 2015, 15 (01) : 11 - 18
  • [4] Multi-criteria decision-making system for sustainable building assessment/certification
    M. Medineckiene
    E. K. Zavadskas
    F. Björk
    Z. Turskis
    [J]. Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering, 2015, 15 : 11 - 18
  • [5] The stratified multi-criteria decision-making method
    Asadabadi, Mehdi Rajabi
    [J]. KNOWLEDGE-BASED SYSTEMS, 2018, 162 : 115 - 123
  • [6] Multi-Criteria Decision-Making
    Encheva, Sylvia
    [J]. MICBE '09: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 10TH WSEAS INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTERS IN BUSINESS AND ECONOMICS, 2009, : 192 - +
  • [7] When is a Decision-Making Method Trustworthy? Criteria for Evaluating Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods
    Saaty, Thomas L.
    Ergu, Daji
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY & DECISION MAKING, 2015, 14 (06) : 1171 - 1187
  • [8] Fuzzy α-discounting method for multi-criteria decision-making
    Karaman, Atilla
    Dagdeviren, Metin
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE CHINESE INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERS, 2015, 38 (07) : 855 - 865
  • [9] Multiplicative multi-criteria analysis method for decision-making
    Zizovic, Miodrag M.
    Damljanovic, Nada
    Zizovic, Malisa R.
    [J]. MAEJO INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2016, 10 (02) : 233 - 241
  • [10] A Novel Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Model: Interval Rough SAW Method for Sustainable Supplier Selection
    Stevic, Zeljko
    Durmic, Elmina
    Gajic, Mladen
    Pamucar, Dragan
    Puska, Adis
    [J]. INFORMATION, 2019, 10 (10)