Cultural influences on shared decision-making among Asian Americans: A systematic review and meta-synthesis of qualitative studies

被引:4
|
作者
Tan, Naomi Q. P. [1 ]
Maki, Kristin G. [2 ,3 ]
Lopez-Olivo, Maria A. [1 ]
Geng, Yimin [4 ]
Volk, Robert J. [1 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Hlth Serv Res, Houston, TX USA
[2] Wayne State Univ, Dept Oncol, Med Sch, Detroit, MI USA
[3] Barbara Ann Karmanos Canc Inst, Populat Studies & Dispar Res Program, Detroit, MI USA
[4] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Res Med Lib, Houston, TX USA
[5] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Hlth Serv Res, Unit 1444, Pickens Tower,1400 Pressler St, Houston, TX 77030 USA
关键词
Systematic review; Decision making; shared; Asian Americans; Patient preference; CHINESE-AMERICAN; PATIENT AUTONOMY; IMMIGRANT WOMEN; CANCER; CARE; COMMUNICATION; PREFERENCES; PERCEPTIONS; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.pec.2022.10.350
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Objective: To summarize how Asian Americans negotiate involvement in shared decision-making (SDM) with their providers, the cultural influences on SDM, and perceived barriers and facilitators to SDM. Methods: This is a systematic review of qualitative studies. We searched six electronic databases and sources of gray literature until March 2021. Two reviewers independently screened studies, performed quality appraisal, and data extraction. Meta-synthesis was performed to summarize themes using a three-step approach. Results: Twenty studies with 675 participants were included. We abstracted 275 initial codes and grouped these into 19 subthemes and 4 major themes: (1) negotiating power and differing expectations in SDM; (2) cultural influences on SDM; (3) importance of social support in SDM; and (4) supportive factors for facilitating SDM. Conclusions: Asian Americans have important perspectives, needs, and preferences regarding SDM that impacts how they engage with the provider on medical decisions and their perception of the quality of their care. Practice implications: Asian American patients valued good communication and sufficient time with their pro-vider, and that it is important for health professionals to understand patients' desired level of involvement in the SDM process and in the final decision, and who should be involved in SDM beyond the patient. Other: This systematic review was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42021241665).
引用
收藏
页码:17 / 30
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The experiences of reproductive concerns in cancer survivors: A systematic review and meta-synthesis of qualitative studies
    Dong, Ying
    Yue, Zhenyu
    Zhuang, Huan
    Zhang, Chen
    Fang, Yu
    Jiang, Guichun
    [J]. CANCER MEDICINE, 2023, 12 (24): : 22224 - 22251
  • [42] Personal recovery in personality disorder: Systematic review and meta-synthesis of qualitative methods studies
    Shepherd, Andrew
    Sanders, Caroline
    Doyle, Michael
    Shaw, Jenny
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOCIAL PSYCHIATRY, 2016, 62 (01) : 41 - 50
  • [43] Shared Decision-Making for Cancer Care Among Racial and Ethnic Minorities: A Systematic Review
    Mead, Erin L.
    Doorenbos, Ardith Z.
    Javid, Sara H.
    Haozous, Emily A.
    Alvord, Lori Arviso
    Flum, David R.
    Morris, Arden M.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2013, 103 (12) : E15 - E29
  • [44] Gender bias in shared decision-making among cancer care guidelines: A systematic review
    Rivera-Izquierdo, Mario
    Maes-Carballo, Marta
    Jimenez-Moleon, Jose J.
    Martinez-Ruiz, Virginia
    Blaakaer, Jan
    Olmedo-Requena, Rocio
    Khan, Khalid S.
    Jorgensen, Jan S.
    [J]. HEALTH EXPECTATIONS, 2023, 26 (03) : 1019 - 1038
  • [45] Substitute decision makers' experiences of making decisions at end of life for older persons with dementia: A systematic review and qualitative meta-synthesis
    Cresp, Sarah Jane
    Lee, Susan Fiona
    Moss, Cheryle
    [J]. DEMENTIA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOCIAL RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 2020, 19 (05): : 1532 - 1559
  • [46] Influential factors in the adoption of clinical decision support systems in hospital settings: a systematic review and meta-synthesis of qualitative studies
    Bonakdeh, Erfan Shakibaei
    Sohal, Amrik
    Rajabkhah, Koorosh
    Prajogo, Daniel
    Melder, Angela
    Nguyen, Dinh Quy
    Bingham, Gordon
    Tong, Erica
    [J]. INDUSTRIAL MANAGEMENT & DATA SYSTEMS, 2024, 124 (04) : 1463 - 1500
  • [47] The perceptions of living with diabetic foot ulcers: A systematic review and meta-synthesis of qualitative studies
    Ma, Lin
    Chen, Ji
    Sun, Yue
    Feng, Yue
    Yuan, Li
    Ran, Xingwu
    [J]. JOURNAL OF TISSUE VIABILITY, 2023, 32 (01) : 39 - 50
  • [48] The role of informal caregivers for patients with glioma: a systematic review and meta-synthesis of qualitative studies
    Chen, Dan
    Zhu, Jinfeng
    Xu, Qiuning
    Wang, Fang
    Ji, Cuiling
    Di, Hengdan
    Yuan, Ping
    Bai, Xiaoyan
    Chen, Lu
    [J]. ANNALS OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE, 2021, 9 (12)
  • [49] Decision-making experiences and the need for decision aids in women considering vaginal birth after cesarean: A qualitative meta-synthesis
    Zhou, Shurong
    Li, Mengyuan
    Jie, Xiang
    [J]. BIRTH-ISSUES IN PERINATAL CARE, 2024, 51 (01): : 3 - 12
  • [50] The experiences of adolescents and young adults with epilepsy: A systematic review and meta-synthesis of qualitative studies
    Bai, Nan
    Yin, Min
    Zhang, Huiyue
    Li, Zheng
    [J]. EPILEPSY & BEHAVIOR, 2023, 140