Cultural influences on shared decision-making among Asian Americans: A systematic review and meta-synthesis of qualitative studies

被引:4
|
作者
Tan, Naomi Q. P. [1 ]
Maki, Kristin G. [2 ,3 ]
Lopez-Olivo, Maria A. [1 ]
Geng, Yimin [4 ]
Volk, Robert J. [1 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Hlth Serv Res, Houston, TX USA
[2] Wayne State Univ, Dept Oncol, Med Sch, Detroit, MI USA
[3] Barbara Ann Karmanos Canc Inst, Populat Studies & Dispar Res Program, Detroit, MI USA
[4] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Res Med Lib, Houston, TX USA
[5] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Hlth Serv Res, Unit 1444, Pickens Tower,1400 Pressler St, Houston, TX 77030 USA
关键词
Systematic review; Decision making; shared; Asian Americans; Patient preference; CHINESE-AMERICAN; PATIENT AUTONOMY; IMMIGRANT WOMEN; CANCER; CARE; COMMUNICATION; PREFERENCES; PERCEPTIONS; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.pec.2022.10.350
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Objective: To summarize how Asian Americans negotiate involvement in shared decision-making (SDM) with their providers, the cultural influences on SDM, and perceived barriers and facilitators to SDM. Methods: This is a systematic review of qualitative studies. We searched six electronic databases and sources of gray literature until March 2021. Two reviewers independently screened studies, performed quality appraisal, and data extraction. Meta-synthesis was performed to summarize themes using a three-step approach. Results: Twenty studies with 675 participants were included. We abstracted 275 initial codes and grouped these into 19 subthemes and 4 major themes: (1) negotiating power and differing expectations in SDM; (2) cultural influences on SDM; (3) importance of social support in SDM; and (4) supportive factors for facilitating SDM. Conclusions: Asian Americans have important perspectives, needs, and preferences regarding SDM that impacts how they engage with the provider on medical decisions and their perception of the quality of their care. Practice implications: Asian American patients valued good communication and sufficient time with their pro-vider, and that it is important for health professionals to understand patients' desired level of involvement in the SDM process and in the final decision, and who should be involved in SDM beyond the patient. Other: This systematic review was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42021241665).
引用
收藏
页码:17 / 30
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] How do informal information sources influence women's decision-making for birth? A meta-synthesis of qualitative studies
    Sanders, Ruth A.
    Crozier, Kenda
    [J]. BMC PREGNANCY AND CHILDBIRTH, 2018, 18
  • [32] Cultural and societal motivations for being informal caregivers: a qualitative systematic review and meta-synthesis
    Zarzycki, Mikolaj
    Morrison, Val
    Bei, Eva
    Seddon, Diane
    [J]. HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 2023, 17 (02) : 247 - 276
  • [33] Caregiving experiences of stroke caregivers: A systematic review and meta-synthesis of qualitative studies
    Wang, Lingyu
    Liu, Jingyu
    Wu, Lingsha
    Zhang, Jing
    Fang, Haiyan
    [J]. MEDICINE, 2023, 102 (13) : E33392
  • [34] Palliative care in chronic heart failure: a theoretically guided, qualitative meta-synthesis of decision-making
    Gursharan K. Singh
    Serra E. Ivynian
    Caleb Ferguson
    Patricia M. Davidson
    Phillip J. Newton
    [J]. Heart Failure Reviews, 2020, 25 : 457 - 467
  • [35] Influences affecting decision-making regarding use of pre-exposure prophylaxis among black men who have sex with men in the USA: a systematic review and meta-synthesis
    Hutchins, Freddie
    Drey, Nicholas
    [J]. SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED INFECTIONS, 2024, 100 (02) : 98 - 105
  • [36] TRUST AND SHARED DECISION-MAKING AMONG AFRICAN-AMERICANS WITH DIABETES
    Peek, Monica E.
    Gorawara-Bhat, Rita
    Quinn, Michael T.
    Odoms-Young, Angela
    Wilson, Shannon C.
    Chin, Marshall H.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2011, 26 : S283 - S284
  • [37] Shared decision-making and the duration of medical consultations: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    van Veenendaal, Haske
    Chernova, Genya
    Bouman, Carlijn M. B.
    van Etten-Jamaludin, Faridi S.
    van Dieren, Susan
    Ubbink, Dirk T.
    [J]. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2023, 107
  • [38] Decision aids for promoting shared decision-making: A review of systematic reviews
    Park, Myonghwa
    Doan, Thao Thi-Thu
    Jung, Jihye
    Giap, Thi-Thanh-Tinh
    Kim, Jinju
    [J]. NURSING & HEALTH SCIENCES, 2024, 26 (01)
  • [39] Decision-making on the location of care of the elderly: protocol for a systematic review of qualitative studies
    Serrano-Gemes, Gema
    Serrano-del-Rosal, Rafael
    Rich-Ruiz, Manuel
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2018, 8 (10):
  • [40] Cancer survivors' experiences with financial toxicity: A systematic review and meta-synthesis of qualitative studies
    Zhu Zheng
    Xing Weijie
    Zhang Xiaoju
    Hu Yan
    So, Winnie K. W.
    [J]. PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY, 2020, 29 (06) : 945 - 959