Cultural influences on shared decision-making among Asian Americans: A systematic review and meta-synthesis of qualitative studies

被引:4
|
作者
Tan, Naomi Q. P. [1 ]
Maki, Kristin G. [2 ,3 ]
Lopez-Olivo, Maria A. [1 ]
Geng, Yimin [4 ]
Volk, Robert J. [1 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Hlth Serv Res, Houston, TX USA
[2] Wayne State Univ, Dept Oncol, Med Sch, Detroit, MI USA
[3] Barbara Ann Karmanos Canc Inst, Populat Studies & Dispar Res Program, Detroit, MI USA
[4] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Res Med Lib, Houston, TX USA
[5] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Hlth Serv Res, Unit 1444, Pickens Tower,1400 Pressler St, Houston, TX 77030 USA
关键词
Systematic review; Decision making; shared; Asian Americans; Patient preference; CHINESE-AMERICAN; PATIENT AUTONOMY; IMMIGRANT WOMEN; CANCER; CARE; COMMUNICATION; PREFERENCES; PERCEPTIONS; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.pec.2022.10.350
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Objective: To summarize how Asian Americans negotiate involvement in shared decision-making (SDM) with their providers, the cultural influences on SDM, and perceived barriers and facilitators to SDM. Methods: This is a systematic review of qualitative studies. We searched six electronic databases and sources of gray literature until March 2021. Two reviewers independently screened studies, performed quality appraisal, and data extraction. Meta-synthesis was performed to summarize themes using a three-step approach. Results: Twenty studies with 675 participants were included. We abstracted 275 initial codes and grouped these into 19 subthemes and 4 major themes: (1) negotiating power and differing expectations in SDM; (2) cultural influences on SDM; (3) importance of social support in SDM; and (4) supportive factors for facilitating SDM. Conclusions: Asian Americans have important perspectives, needs, and preferences regarding SDM that impacts how they engage with the provider on medical decisions and their perception of the quality of their care. Practice implications: Asian American patients valued good communication and sufficient time with their pro-vider, and that it is important for health professionals to understand patients' desired level of involvement in the SDM process and in the final decision, and who should be involved in SDM beyond the patient. Other: This systematic review was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42021241665).
引用
收藏
页码:17 / 30
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Shared Decision-Making for Patients with Stroke in Neurocritical Care: A Qualitative Meta-Synthesis
    Zhang, Hui
    Davies, Carmel
    Stokes, Diarmuid
    O'Donnell, Deirdre
    [J]. NEUROCRITICAL CARE, 2024,
  • [2] Integrating shared decision-making, expressing preferences and active participation of older adults in primary care nursing: a systematic review of qualitative studies and qualitative meta-synthesis
    Martinez-Angulo, Pablo
    Rich-Ruiz, Manuel
    Ventura-Puertos, Pedro E.
    Lopez-Quero, Salvador
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2023, 13 (06):
  • [3] Medical treatment decision-making in rural cancer patients: A qualitative systematic review and meta-synthesis
    Basile, Victoria A.
    Dhillon, Haryana M.
    Spoelma, Michael J.
    Butow, Phyllis N.
    May, Jennifer
    Depczynski, Julie
    Pendlebury, Susan
    [J]. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2022, 105 (08) : 2693 - 2701
  • [4] Understanding pre-dialysis modality decision-making: A meta-synthesis of qualitative studies
    Harwood, Lori
    Clark, Alexander M.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING STUDIES, 2013, 50 (01) : 109 - 120
  • [5] Experiences of cancer survivors returning to work decision-making: a meta-synthesis of qualitative studies
    Su, Xiao-qin
    Sang, Hong-hua
    Kuai, Ben-xin
    Xue, Ping
    Guo, Yu-jie
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CANCER SURVIVORSHIP, 2024,
  • [6] What are the external influences on information exchange and shared decision-making in healthcare consultations: A meta-synthesis of the literature
    Edwards, Michelle
    Davies, Myfanwy
    Edwards, Adrian
    [J]. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2009, 75 (01) : 37 - 52
  • [7] A Qualitative Systematic Review of Internal and External Influences on Shared Decision-making in All Healthcare Settings
    Truglio-Londrigan, Marie
    Slyer, Jason
    Singleton, Joanne
    Worral, Priscilla
    [J]. NURSING RESEARCH, 2015, 64 (02) : E103 - E103
  • [8] Factors promoting shared decision-making in renal replacement therapy for patients with end-stage kidney disease: systematic review and qualitative meta-synthesis
    Shi, Yu
    Li, Wang
    Duan, Fangjian
    Pu, Shi
    Peng, Hongmei
    Ha, Mei
    Luo, Yu
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL UROLOGY AND NEPHROLOGY, 2022, 54 (03) : 553 - 574
  • [9] Factors promoting shared decision-making in renal replacement therapy for patients with end-stage kidney disease: systematic review and qualitative meta-synthesis
    Yu Shi
    Wang Li
    Fangjian Duan
    Shi Pu
    Hongmei Peng
    Mei Ha
    Yu Luo
    [J]. International Urology and Nephrology, 2022, 54 : 553 - 574
  • [10] How coaches' decision-making affect athlete selection: A systematic review and meta-synthesis
    Xiang, Changqing
    Zhao, Jie
    Kamalden, Tengku Fadilah Tengku
    Dong, Wenting
    Luo, Hua
    Ismail, Normala
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPORTS SCIENCE & COACHING, 2024, 19 (04) : 1801 - 1812