Sibling oocytes cultured in a time-lapse versus benchtop incubator: how time-lapse incubators improve blastocyst development and euploid rate

被引:0
|
作者
Nobrega, N. G. [1 ]
Abdala, A. [2 ]
El-Damen, A. [2 ]
Arnanz, A. [2 ]
Bayram, A. [2 ]
Elkhatib, I. [2 ]
Lawrenz, B. [2 ,3 ]
Fatemi, H. [2 ]
De Munck, N. [2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] TFP GCRM, Glasgow City, Scotland
[2] Art Fertil Clin, Abu Dhabi, U Arab Emirates
[3] Tubingen Univ, Tubingen, Germany
[4] UZ Brussels, Ctr Reprod Med, Brussels IVF, Brussels, Belgium
关键词
Blastocyst culture; Conventional Incubator; Embryo development; Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy; Time-lapse technology; EMBRYO CULTURE; IVF; PREGNANCIES; REDUCTION; INJECTION; QUALITY; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1017/S0967199423000242
中图分类号
Q2 [细胞生物学];
学科分类号
071009 ; 090102 ;
摘要
The aim was to study whether a limited exposure of embryos outside the incubator has an effect on embryo development, blastocyst quality and euploid outcomes. This retrospective study was performed at ART Fertility Clinics, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates (UAE) between March 2018 and April 2020 and included 796 mature sibling oocytes that were split randomly between two incubators after intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI): an EmbryoScope (TM) (ES) incubator and a benchtop incubator, G185 K-SYSTEMS (KS). The fertilization, cleavage, embryo/blastocyst qualities, useable blastocyst and euploid rates were assessed to evaluate the incubator performance. In total, 503 (63.2%) mature oocytes were cultured in the EmbryoScope and 293 (36.8%) in the K-SYSTEMS. No differences were observed in fertilization rate (79.3% vs 78.8%, P = 0.932), cleavage rate (98.5% vs 99.1%, P = 0.676) and embryo quality on Day 3 (P = 0.543) between both incubators, respectively. Embryos cultured in the EmbryoScope, had a significantly higher chance of being biopsied (64.8% vs 49.6%, P < 0.001). Moreover, a significantly higher blastocyst biopsy rate was observed on Day 5 in the EmbryoScope (67.8% vs 57.0%, P = 0.037), with a highly significant increased euploid rate (63.5% vs 37.4%, P = 0.001) and improved blastocyst quality (P = 0.008). We found that exposure of embryos outside the incubator may negatively affect the in vitro blastocyst development and euploid rate on Day 5.
引用
收藏
页码:402 / 409
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] pregnancy is significantly correlated with the blastocyst width and area: a time-lapse study
    Sciorio, R.
    Thong, D.
    Thong, K. J.
    Pickering, S.
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2020, 35 : 198 - 198
  • [42] Blastocyst culture using continuous culture medium and time-lapse monitoring
    Watanabe, S.
    Kamihata, M.
    Mita, W.
    Miura, M.
    Kobayashi, Y.
    Miyata, K.
    Tanaka, T.
    Matsunaga, R.
    Yamanaka, N.
    Nishiyama, S.
    Miyamura, H.
    Katsumata, Y.
    Kuwahata, A.
    Ochi, M.
    Horiuchi, T.
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2014, 29 : 184 - 184
  • [43] Pregnancy achieved by transfer of a single blastocyst selected by time-lapse monitoring
    Pribenszky, Csaba
    Matyas, Szabolcs
    Kovacs, Peter
    Losonczi, Eszter
    Zadori, Janos
    Vajta, Gabor
    [J]. REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE, 2010, 21 (04) : 533 - 536
  • [44] Development of deep learning algorithms for predicting blastocyst formation and quality by time-lapse monitoring
    Liao, Qiuyue
    Zhang, Qi
    Feng, Xue
    Huang, Haibo
    Xu, Haohao
    Tian, Baoyuan
    Liu, Jihao
    Yu, Qihui
    Guo, Na
    Liu, Qun
    Huang, Bo
    Ma, Ding
    Ai, Jihui
    Xu, Shugong
    Li, Kezhen
    [J]. COMMUNICATIONS BIOLOGY, 2021, 4 (01)
  • [45] Development of deep learning algorithms for predicting blastocyst formation and quality by time-lapse monitoring
    Qiuyue Liao
    Qi Zhang
    Xue Feng
    Haibo Huang
    Haohao Xu
    Baoyuan Tian
    Jihao Liu
    Qihui Yu
    Na Guo
    Qun Liu
    Bo Huang
    Ding Ma
    Jihui Ai
    Shugong Xu
    Kezhen Li
    [J]. Communications Biology, 4
  • [46] COMPARISON OF EMBRYO QUALITY AND EUPLOIDY RATE USING TWO DIFFERENT TIME-LAPSE SYSTEMS AND A BENCHTOP INCUBATOR IN THE SAME IVF LABORATORY.
    Ruiz, B. Aparicio
    Basile, N.
    Alegre, L.
    Viloria, T.
    Remohi, J.
    Meseguer, M.
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2018, 110 (04) : E224 - E224
  • [47] Comparison of morphokinetic parameters between euploid and aneuploid embryos by time-lapse monitoring
    Bayram, A.
    Ciray, H. N.
    Sahin, O.
    Okutman-Emonts, O.
    Bahceci, M.
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2012, 27
  • [48] ESTIMATING REAL-ESTATE DEVELOPMENT TIME-LAPSE
    GRIMM, CT
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE CONSTRUCTION DIVISION-ASCE, 1977, 103 (02): : 213 - 226
  • [49] IMAGING MOUSE DEVELOPMENT WITH CONFOCAL TIME-LAPSE MICROSCOPY
    Nowotschin, Sonja
    Ferrer-Vaquer, Anna
    Hadjantonakis, Anna-Katerina
    [J]. GUIDE TO TECHNIQUES IN MOUSE DEVELOPMENT, PT A: MICE, EMBRYOS, AND CELLS, 2ND EDITION, 2010, 476 : 351 - 377
  • [50] The combination of embryo morphokinetics, blastocyst morphodynamics and classical morphology grading by using last generation time-lapse incubators improve embryo selection
    Romany Sevilla, L.
    Bori, L.
    Alegre, L.
    Del Gallego, R.
    Remohi, J.
    Meseguer, M.
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2019, 34 : 220 - 220