COVID-19 Chest CT Quantification: Triage and Prognostic Value in Different Ages

被引:0
|
作者
Nokiani, Alireza Almasi [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Shahnazari, Razieh [1 ,3 ]
Abbasi, Mohammad Amin [1 ,3 ]
Divsalar, Farshad [1 ,3 ]
Bayazidi, Marzieh [1 ,2 ]
Sadatnaseri, Azadeh [1 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Iran Univ Med Sci, Firoozabadi Hosp, Dept Radiol, Tehran, Iran
[2] Iran Univ Med Sci, Firoozabadi Clin Res Dev Unit FCRDU, Dept Radiol, Tehran, Iran
[3] Iran Univ Med Sci, Firoozabadi Clin Res Dev Unit FCRDU, Tehran, Iran
[4] Univ Tehran Med Sci, Sina Hosp, Dept Cardiol, Tehran, Iran
[5] Sina Hosp, Imam Khomeini St, Tehran, Iran
关键词
Area Under Curve; Computed Tomography; COVID-19; Intraclass Correlation Coefficient; ROC Curve; Quantification; INTRACLASS CORRELATION-COEFFICIENTS; RISK-FACTORS; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.3121/cmr.2023.1772
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: We evaluated the triage and prognostic performance of seven proposed computed tomography (CT)-severity score (CTSS) systems in two different age groups.Design: Retrospective study.Setting: COVID-19 pandemic.Participants: Admitted COVID-19, PCR-positive patients were included, excluding patients with heart failure and significant pre-existing pulmonary disease.Methods: Patients were divided into two age groups: >= 65 years and <= 64 years. Clinical data indicating disease severity at presentation and at peak disease severity were recorded. Initial CT images were scored by two radiologists according to seven CTSSs (CTSS1-CTSS7). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis for the performance of each CTSS in diagnosing severe/critical disease on admission (triage performance) and at peak disease severity (prognostic performance) was done for the whole cohort and each age group separately.Results: Included were 96 patients. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) between the two radiologists scoring the CT scan images were good for all the CTSSs (ICC=0.764-0.837). In the whole cohort, all CTSSs showed an unsatisfactory area under the curve (AUC) in the ROC curve for triage, excluding CTSS2 (AUC=0.700), and all CTSSs showed acceptable AUCs for prognostic usage (0.759-0.781). In the older group (>= 65 years; n=55), all CTSSs excluding CTSS6 showed excellent AUCs for triage (0.804-0.830), and CTSS6 was acceptable (AUC=0.796); all CTSSs showed excellent or outstanding AUCs for prognostication (0.859-0.919). In the younger group (<= 64 years; n=41), all CTSSs showed unsatisfactory AUCs for triage (AUC=0.487-0.565) and prognostic usage (AUC=0.668-0.694), excluding CTSS6, showing marginally acceptable AUC for prognostic performance (0.700).Conclusion: Those CTSSs requiring more numerous segmentations, namely CTSS2, CTSS7, and CTSS5 showed the best ICCs; therefore, they are the best when comparison between two separate scores is needed. Irrespective of patients' age, CTSSs show minimal value in triage and acceptable prognostic value in COVID-19 patients. CTSS performance is highly variable in different age groups. It is excellent in those aged >= 65 years, but has little if any value in younger patients. Multicenter studies with larger sample size to evaluate results of this study should be conducted.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:14 / 25
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Artificial intelligence-based quantification of COVID-19 pneumonia burden using chest CT
    Nardocci, Chiara
    Simon, Judit
    Budai, Bettina Katalin
    IMAGING, 2024, 16 (01): : 1 - 21
  • [32] Prognostic value of kidney involvement in COVID-19
    Fragale, Guillermo
    Tisi Bana, Matias
    Magenta, Mauro
    Beitia, Vanina
    Karl, Alejandra
    Rodriguez Cortes, Lina
    Pousa, Victoria
    REVISTA DE NEFROLOGIA DIALISIS Y TRASPLANTE, 2022, 42 (01): : 4 - 10
  • [33] Chest CT imaging features and severity scores as biomarkers for prognostic prediction in patients with COVID-19
    Zhou, Shuchang
    Chen, Chengyang
    Hu, Yiqi
    Lv, Wenzhi
    Ai, Tao
    Xia, Liming
    ANNALS OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE, 2020, 8 (21)
  • [34] Prognostic Significance of Chest Imaging by LUS and CT in COVID-19 Inpatients: The ECOVID Multicenter Study
    Tana, Claudio
    Ricci, Fabrizio
    Coppola, Maria Gabriella
    Mantini, Cesare
    Lauretani, Fulvio
    Campanozzi, Daniele
    Renda, Giulia
    Gallina, Sabina
    Lugara, Marina
    Cipollone, Francesco
    Giamberardino, Maria Adele
    Mucci, Luciano
    RESPIRATION, 2021, : 122 - 131
  • [35] The prognostic value of biomarker levels and chest imaging in patients with COVID-19 presenting to the emergency department
    Abou Dagher, Gilbert
    Ghanem, Alain Abi
    Haidar, Saadeddine
    Kattouf, Nadim
    Assaf, Mohamad
    Khdhir, Mihran
    Chahine, Reve
    Rizk, Jennifer
    Makki, Maha
    Tamim, Hani
    Chebl, Ralph Bou
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2022, 59 : 15 - 23
  • [36] Chest CT abnormalities in COVID-19: a systematic review
    Abou Ghayda, Ramy
    Lee, Keum Hwa
    Kim, Jae Seok
    Lee, Seul
    Hong, Sung Hwi
    Kim, Kyeong Seok
    Kim, Kyeong Eon
    Seok, Jinhyn
    Kim, Hajeong
    Seo, Jangsuk
    Lee, Seungmin
    Koyanagi, Ai
    Jacob, Louis
    Smith, Lee
    Li, Han
    Kronbichler, Andreas
    Shin, Jae Il
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2021, 18 (15): : 3395 - 3402
  • [37] Utility of chest CT in diagnosis of COVID-19 pneumonia
    Luo, Ning
    Zhang, Han
    Zhou, Yang
    Kong, ZiXuan
    Sun, WeiHang
    Huang, Nan
    Zhang, AoDan
    DIAGNOSTIC AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 2020, 26 (05) : 437 - 442
  • [38] Chest CT in asymptomatic COVID-19: benefits and concerns
    Chan, Ling-Ling
    Tan, Eng-King
    QUANTITATIVE IMAGING IN MEDICINE AND SURGERY, 2020, 10 (07) : 1570 - 1571
  • [39] Lessons learned from chest CT in COVID-19
    Soyer, P.
    DIAGNOSTIC AND INTERVENTIONAL IMAGING, 2020, 101 (05) : 261 - 262
  • [40] Value of chest imaging in the newborn with suspected COVID-19
    Li, H-Y
    Zhang, C-M
    Lv, Y-Y
    Dai, W-Q
    Xu, B.
    Qi, X-M
    EUROPEAN REVIEW FOR MEDICAL AND PHARMACOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2020, 24 (22) : 11971 - 11976