COVID-19 Chest CT Quantification: Triage and Prognostic Value in Different Ages

被引:0
|
作者
Nokiani, Alireza Almasi [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Shahnazari, Razieh [1 ,3 ]
Abbasi, Mohammad Amin [1 ,3 ]
Divsalar, Farshad [1 ,3 ]
Bayazidi, Marzieh [1 ,2 ]
Sadatnaseri, Azadeh [1 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Iran Univ Med Sci, Firoozabadi Hosp, Dept Radiol, Tehran, Iran
[2] Iran Univ Med Sci, Firoozabadi Clin Res Dev Unit FCRDU, Dept Radiol, Tehran, Iran
[3] Iran Univ Med Sci, Firoozabadi Clin Res Dev Unit FCRDU, Tehran, Iran
[4] Univ Tehran Med Sci, Sina Hosp, Dept Cardiol, Tehran, Iran
[5] Sina Hosp, Imam Khomeini St, Tehran, Iran
关键词
Area Under Curve; Computed Tomography; COVID-19; Intraclass Correlation Coefficient; ROC Curve; Quantification; INTRACLASS CORRELATION-COEFFICIENTS; RISK-FACTORS; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.3121/cmr.2023.1772
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: We evaluated the triage and prognostic performance of seven proposed computed tomography (CT)-severity score (CTSS) systems in two different age groups.Design: Retrospective study.Setting: COVID-19 pandemic.Participants: Admitted COVID-19, PCR-positive patients were included, excluding patients with heart failure and significant pre-existing pulmonary disease.Methods: Patients were divided into two age groups: >= 65 years and <= 64 years. Clinical data indicating disease severity at presentation and at peak disease severity were recorded. Initial CT images were scored by two radiologists according to seven CTSSs (CTSS1-CTSS7). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis for the performance of each CTSS in diagnosing severe/critical disease on admission (triage performance) and at peak disease severity (prognostic performance) was done for the whole cohort and each age group separately.Results: Included were 96 patients. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) between the two radiologists scoring the CT scan images were good for all the CTSSs (ICC=0.764-0.837). In the whole cohort, all CTSSs showed an unsatisfactory area under the curve (AUC) in the ROC curve for triage, excluding CTSS2 (AUC=0.700), and all CTSSs showed acceptable AUCs for prognostic usage (0.759-0.781). In the older group (>= 65 years; n=55), all CTSSs excluding CTSS6 showed excellent AUCs for triage (0.804-0.830), and CTSS6 was acceptable (AUC=0.796); all CTSSs showed excellent or outstanding AUCs for prognostication (0.859-0.919). In the younger group (<= 64 years; n=41), all CTSSs showed unsatisfactory AUCs for triage (AUC=0.487-0.565) and prognostic usage (AUC=0.668-0.694), excluding CTSS6, showing marginally acceptable AUC for prognostic performance (0.700).Conclusion: Those CTSSs requiring more numerous segmentations, namely CTSS2, CTSS7, and CTSS5 showed the best ICCs; therefore, they are the best when comparison between two separate scores is needed. Irrespective of patients' age, CTSSs show minimal value in triage and acceptable prognostic value in COVID-19 patients. CTSS performance is highly variable in different age groups. It is excellent in those aged >= 65 years, but has little if any value in younger patients. Multicenter studies with larger sample size to evaluate results of this study should be conducted.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:14 / 25
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Automatic deep learning system for COVID-19 infection quantification in chest CT
    Alirr, Omar Ibrahim
    MULTIMEDIA TOOLS AND APPLICATIONS, 2022, 81 (01) : 527 - 541
  • [22] The prognostic value of pneumonia severity score and pectoralis muscle Area on chest CT in adult COVID-19 patients
    Ufuk, Furkan
    Demirci, Mahmut
    Sagtas, Ergin
    Akbudak, Ismail Hakki
    Ugurlu, Erhan
    Sari, Tugba
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2020, 131
  • [23] AUTOMATED TRIAGE OF COVID-19 FROM VARIOUS LUNG ABNORMALITIES USING CHEST CT FEATURES
    Amran, Dor
    Frid-Adar, Maayan
    Sagie, Nimrod
    Nassar, Jannette
    Kabakovitch, Asher
    Greenspan, Hayit
    2021 IEEE 18TH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON BIOMEDICAL IMAGING (ISBI), 2021, : 155 - 159
  • [24] Performance of Low-Dose Chest CT as a Triage Tool for Suspected COVID-19 Patients
    Desmet, Jeroen
    Biebau, Charlotte
    De Wever, Walter
    Cockmartin, Lesley
    Viktor, Verbraeken
    Coolen, Johan
    Verschakelen, Johny
    Dubbeldam, Adriana
    JOURNAL OF THE BELGIAN SOCIETY OF RADIOLOGY, 2021, 105 (01): : 1 - 8
  • [25] Accuracy of Chest CT for Differentiating COVID-19 from COVID-19 Mimics
    Saehn, Marwin-Jonathan
    Yueksel, Can
    Keil, Sebastian
    Zeisberger, Marcel P.
    Post, Manuel
    Kleines, Michael
    Brokmann, Joerg Christian
    Huebel, Christian
    Kuhl, Christiane K.
    Isfort, Peter
    Schulze-Hagen, Maximilian Franz
    ROFO-FORTSCHRITTE AUF DEM GEBIET DER RONTGENSTRAHLEN UND DER BILDGEBENDEN VERFAHREN, 2021, 193 (09): : 1081 - 1091
  • [26] Comparison of chest radiography and chest CT for evaluation of pediatric COVID-19 pneumonia: Does CT add diagnostic value?
    Das, Karuna M.
    Alkoteesh, Jamal A.
    Al Kaabi, Jumaa
    Al Mansoori, Taleb
    Winant, Abbey J.
    Singh, Rajvir
    Paraswani, Rajesh
    Syed, Rizwan
    Sharif, Elsadeg M.
    Balhaj, Ghazala B.
    Lee, Edward Y.
    PEDIATRIC PULMONOLOGY, 2021, 56 (06) : 1409 - 1418
  • [27] Frequency and spectrum of incidental findings when using chest CT as a primary triage tool for COVID-19
    Kilsdonk, Iris D.
    de Roos, Marlise P.
    Bresser, Paul
    Reesink, Herre J.
    Peringa, Jan
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY OPEN, 2021, 8
  • [28] How to evaluate the value of chest CT in COVID-19: case reports and literature review
    Jun Fu
    Pian-pian Huang
    Qing-dong Yao
    Shuang Zhang
    Rui Han
    Hai-feng Liu
    Yi Yang
    Dong-you Zhang
    Chinese Journal of Academic Radiology, 2020, 3 : 181 - 185
  • [29] How to evaluate the value of chest CT in COVID-19: case reports and literature review
    Fu, Jun
    Huang, Pian-pian
    Yao, Qing-dong
    Zhang, Shuang
    Han, Rui
    Liu, Hai-feng
    Yang, Yi
    Zhang, Dong-you
    CHINESE JOURNAL OF ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2020, 3 (04) : 181 - 185
  • [30] Clinical Value of COVID-19 Chest Radiography and High-Resolution CT Examination
    Wang, Dan
    Shang, Yalei
    Chen, Yuehua
    Xia, Jianguo
    Tian, Weizhong
    Zhang, Tao
    Dai, Hui
    Li, Yonggang
    CURRENT MEDICAL IMAGING, 2022, 18 (07) : 780 - 786