Types of learning and varieties of innovation: how does policy learning enable policy innovation?

被引:3
|
作者
Goyal, Nihit [1 ]
Howlett, Michael [2 ]
机构
[1] Delft Univ Technol, Delft, Netherlands
[2] Simon Fraser Univ, Burnaby, BC, Canada
来源
关键词
Key words knowledge utilisation; multiple streams framework; MSF; policy change; policy entrepreneurship; policy innovation; policy learning; policy process; ADVOCACY COALITION FRAMEWORK; MULTIPLE STREAMS FRAMEWORK; INSTRUMENT CONSTITUENCIES; ELITES PERCEPTIONS; EUROPEAN-UNION; DIFFUSION; GOVERNANCE; WINDOWS; IMPLEMENTATION; POLITICS;
D O I
10.1332/030557321X16841388707452
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
Policy innovation is considered important for addressing major challenges such as climate change and the sustainable energy transition. Although policy learning is likely to play a key role in enabling policy innovation, the link between them remains unclear despite much research on both topics. To address this gap, we move beyond a binary treatment of policy innovation and differentiate policy problem innovation from policy instrument innovation and policy process innovation. Subsequently, we synthesise the literature on policy learning with the research on the multiple streams framework (MSF), a well-known lens for explaining policy innovation. Like earlier policy learning studies, we distinguish several types of learning by posing the key questions of learning, but in the context of each stream of the MSF: who learns (actors), what (beliefs), how (modes), and to what effect (ripening). This new conceptualisation clarifies the relationship of each type of policy learning to the varieties of policy innovation. Further, it indicates that policy learning is likely to result in policy innovation if and only if it influences the coupling among the three streams during a window of opportunity - through policy entrepreneurship - and not otherwise. We conclude with the implications of this study for future research on policy innovation, policy learning, and the MSF.
引用
收藏
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Reinventing industrial policy at the frontier: catalysing learning and innovation in Brazil
    Perez-Aleman, Paola
    Alves, Flavia Chaves
    [J]. CAMBRIDGE JOURNAL OF REGIONS ECONOMY AND SOCIETY, 2017, 10 (01) : 151 - 171
  • [22] The limits of learning: Policy evaluation and the Ontario Ministry of Research and Innovation
    Sharaput, Markus
    [J]. CANADIAN PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION-ADMINISTRATION PUBLIQUE DU CANADA, 2012, 55 (02): : 247 - 267
  • [23] Organisational Learning, Supportive Innovation Systems and Implications for Policy Formulation
    Arne Isaksen
    James Karlsen
    [J]. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 2011, 2 (4) : 453 - 462
  • [24] Organisational Learning, Supportive Innovation Systems and Implications for Policy Formulation
    Isaksen, Arne
    Karlsen, James
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE KNOWLEDGE ECONOMY, 2011, 2 (04) : 453 - 462
  • [25] Special Issue: Policy Innovation in the Global South and South-North Policy Learning
    Kemmerling, Achim
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE POLICY ANALYSIS, 2023, 25 (05): : 475 - 486
  • [26] Innovation in teacher professional learning in europe: research, policy, and practice
    Thamrin, Andi
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EDUCATION FOR TEACHING, 2024,
  • [27] Designing environments for experimentation, learning and innovation in public policy and governance
    Waardenburg, Maurits
    Groenleer, Martijn
    De Jong, Jorrit
    [J]. POLICY AND POLITICS, 2020, 48 (01): : 67 - 87
  • [28] Understanding regional innovation policy dynamics: Actors, agency and learning
    Uyarra, Elvira
    Flanagan, Kieron
    Magro, Edurne
    Wilson, James R.
    Sotarauta, Markku
    [J]. ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING C-POLITICS AND SPACE, 2017, 35 (04) : 559 - 568
  • [29] Face-to-face, buzz, and knowledge bases: sociospatial implications for learning, innovation, and innovation policy
    Asheim, Bjorn
    Coenen, Lars
    Vang, Jan
    [J]. ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING C-GOVERNMENT AND POLICY, 2007, 25 (05): : 655 - 670
  • [30] The regional innovation paradox: Innovation policy and industrial policy
    Oughton C.
    Landabaso M.
    Morgan K.
    [J]. Journal of Technology Transfer, 2002, 27 (01): : 97 - 110