Types of learning and varieties of innovation: how does policy learning enable policy innovation?

被引:3
|
作者
Goyal, Nihit [1 ]
Howlett, Michael [2 ]
机构
[1] Delft Univ Technol, Delft, Netherlands
[2] Simon Fraser Univ, Burnaby, BC, Canada
来源
关键词
Key words knowledge utilisation; multiple streams framework; MSF; policy change; policy entrepreneurship; policy innovation; policy learning; policy process; ADVOCACY COALITION FRAMEWORK; MULTIPLE STREAMS FRAMEWORK; INSTRUMENT CONSTITUENCIES; ELITES PERCEPTIONS; EUROPEAN-UNION; DIFFUSION; GOVERNANCE; WINDOWS; IMPLEMENTATION; POLITICS;
D O I
10.1332/030557321X16841388707452
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
Policy innovation is considered important for addressing major challenges such as climate change and the sustainable energy transition. Although policy learning is likely to play a key role in enabling policy innovation, the link between them remains unclear despite much research on both topics. To address this gap, we move beyond a binary treatment of policy innovation and differentiate policy problem innovation from policy instrument innovation and policy process innovation. Subsequently, we synthesise the literature on policy learning with the research on the multiple streams framework (MSF), a well-known lens for explaining policy innovation. Like earlier policy learning studies, we distinguish several types of learning by posing the key questions of learning, but in the context of each stream of the MSF: who learns (actors), what (beliefs), how (modes), and to what effect (ripening). This new conceptualisation clarifies the relationship of each type of policy learning to the varieties of policy innovation. Further, it indicates that policy learning is likely to result in policy innovation if and only if it influences the coupling among the three streams during a window of opportunity - through policy entrepreneurship - and not otherwise. We conclude with the implications of this study for future research on policy innovation, policy learning, and the MSF.
引用
收藏
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Innovation policy analysis and learning: Comparing Ireland and Taiwan
    Lin, Grace Tyng-Ruu
    Chang, Yo-Hsing
    Shen, Yung-Chi
    [J]. ENTREPRENEURSHIP AND REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT, 2010, 22 (7-8): : 731 - 762
  • [12] Learning regions as a framework for innovation policy: A review of the issues
    Perry, Martin
    [J]. INNOVATION-ORGANIZATION & MANAGEMENT, 2014, 16 (03): : 286 - 302
  • [13] Regional Innovation Policy Processes: Linking Learning to Action
    Jose Aranguren, Mari
    Larrea, Miren
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE KNOWLEDGE ECONOMY, 2011, 2 (04) : 569 - 585
  • [14] Innovation Policy Learning in Iran's Development Plans
    Fartash, Kiarash
    Elyasi, Mahdi
    Ghorbani, Amir
    Sadabadi, Ali Asghar
    [J]. FORESIGHT AND STI GOVERNANCE, 2021, 15 (03) : 81 - 92
  • [15] The globalizing learning economy:: Implications for innovation policy in Europe
    Borrás, S
    [J]. KNOWLEDGE FOR INCLUSIVE DEVELOPMENT, 2002, 2 : 143 - 155
  • [16] HOW DOES ECONOMIC POLICY UNCERTAINTY AFFECT GREEN INNOVATION?
    Peng, Xin-Yu
    Zou, Xing-Yun
    Zhao, Xin-Xin
    Chang, Chun-Ping
    [J]. TECHNOLOGICAL AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT OF ECONOMY, 2023, 29 (01) : 114 - 140
  • [17] Walkable Maps and Policy Innovation for Nature: A Novel Methodology for Understanding Policy Learning
    Petersen, Carolyn J.
    Russel, Duncan J.
    Jensen, Anne
    Pedersen, Anders Branth
    Banzhaf, Ellen
    Kaltenegger, Ingrid
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF QUALITATIVE METHODS, 2024, 23
  • [18] Policy learning and science policy innovation adoption by street-level bureaucrats
    Arnold, Gwen
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PUBLIC POLICY, 2014, 34 (03) : 389 - 414
  • [19] How do cities approach policy innovation and policy learning? A study of 30 policies in Northern Europe and North America
    Marsden, G.
    Frick, K. T.
    May, A. D.
    Deakin, E.
    [J]. TRANSPORT POLICY, 2011, 18 (03) : 501 - 512
  • [20] Innovation policy: what, why, and how
    Edler, Jakob
    Fagerberg, Jan
    [J]. OXFORD REVIEW OF ECONOMIC POLICY, 2017, 33 (01) : 2 - 23