Complications Associated with Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Systematic Review

被引:2
|
作者
Tan, Quan Rui [1 ]
Wong, Russell Andrew [1 ]
Kaliya-Perumal, Arun-Kumar [1 ]
Oh, Jacob Yoong-Leong [2 ]
机构
[1] Nanyang Technol Univ, Lee Kong Chian Sch Med, Singapore 308232, Singapore
[2] Tan Tock Seng Hosp, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Div Spine, Singapore 308433, Singapore
来源
SURGICAL TECHNIQUES DEVELOPMENT | 2023年 / 12卷 / 04期
关键词
meta-analysis; postoperative complications; spinal fusion; spine; spondylosis; ADJACENT SEGMENT PATHOLOGY; INDIRECT DECOMPRESSION; STENOSIS; OUTCOMES; DLIF; OLIF;
D O I
10.3390/std12040020
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
The main advantage of Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion (OLIF) is its ability to provide safe access to the lumbar spine while being a robust interbody fusion technique through a minimally invasive approach. This study reviews the postoperative complications of OLIF, offering a comprehensive understanding of its advantages and disadvantages. A total of 27 studies with 1275 patients were shortlisted based on our selection criteria. Complications were categorized into intra-operative, immediate post-operative, and delayed post-operative and were interpreted based on surgical procedure into stand-alone OLIF, OLIF with posterior stabilisation, and unspecified. Major complications exhibited a pooled prevalence of just 1.7%, whereas the overall pooled prevalence of complications was 24.7%. Among the subgroups, the stand-alone subgroup had the lowest prevalence of complications (14.6%) compared to the unspecified subgroup (29.6%) and the OLIF L2-5 with posterior stabilisation subgroup (25.8%). Similarly, for major complications, the stand-alone subgroup had the lowest prevalence (1.4%), while the OLIF L2-5 with posterior stabilisation subgroup (1.8%) and the unspecified OLIF L2-5 subgroup (1.6%) had higher rates. However, the differences were not statistically significant. In conclusion, the rate of major complications after OLIF is minimal, making it a safe procedure with significant benefits outweighing the risks. The advantages of OLIF L2-5 with posterior stabilisation over stand-alone OLIF L2-5 is a subject of discussion.
引用
收藏
页码:211 / 223
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion (Direct Lateral Interbody Fusion/Extreme Lateral Interbody Fusion) versus Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion Surgery in Spinal Degenerative Disease: A Systematic Review
    Bamps, Sven
    Raymaekers, Vincent
    Roosen, Gert
    Put, Eric
    Vanvolsem, Steven
    Achahbar, Salah-Eddine
    Meeuws, Sacha
    Wissels, Maarten
    Plazier, Mark
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2023, 171 : 10 - 18
  • [42] Ureter Injury as a Complication of Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion
    Lee, Hyeong-Jin
    Kim, Jin-Sung
    Ryu, Kyeong-Sik
    Park, Choon Keun
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2017, 102 : 693.e7
  • [43] A Systematic Review of Complications Following Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery Including Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion
    Hannah Weiss
    Roxanna M. Garcia
    Ben Hopkins
    Nathan Shlobin
    Nader S. Dahdaleh
    Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine, 2019, 12 : 328 - 339
  • [44] A Systematic Review of Complications Following Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery Including Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion
    Weiss, Hannah
    Garcia, Roxanna M.
    Hopkins, Ben
    Shlobin, Nathan
    Dahdaleh, Nader S.
    CURRENT REVIEWS IN MUSCULOSKELETAL MEDICINE, 2019, 12 (03) : 328 - 339
  • [45] Minimally invasive oblique lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis
    Jiang, Zhi-Kai
    Ge, Hong-Ping
    Jiang, Ting-Fei
    Ma, Huan
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2022, 45 (10) : 1876 - 1876
  • [46] Comparison between Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion (OLIF) and Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (MISTLIF) for Lumbar Spondylolisthesis
    Chandra, Vemula V. R.
    Prasad, Bodapati C. M.
    Hanu, Tammireddy G.
    Kale, Pavan G.
    NEUROLOGY INDIA, 2022, 70 (01) : 127 - 134
  • [47] Comparison of complication rates of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and lateral lumbar interbody fusion: a systematic review of the literature
    Joseph, Jacob R.
    Smith, Brandon W.
    La Marca, Frank
    Park, Paul
    NEUROSURGICAL FOCUS, 2015, 39 (04)
  • [48] ANTERIOR LUMBAR INTERBODY FUSION SURGICAL COMPLICATIONS
    WATKINS, R
    CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 1992, (284) : 47 - 53
  • [49] Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion—Outcomes and Complications
    Salzmann S.N.
    Shue J.
    Hughes A.P.
    Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine, 2017, 10 (4) : 539 - 546
  • [50] Indications, techniques, and complications of lumbar interbody fusion
    Tay, BBK
    Berven, S
    SEMINARS IN NEUROLOGY, 2002, 22 (02) : 221 - 229