Complications Associated with Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Systematic Review

被引:2
|
作者
Tan, Quan Rui [1 ]
Wong, Russell Andrew [1 ]
Kaliya-Perumal, Arun-Kumar [1 ]
Oh, Jacob Yoong-Leong [2 ]
机构
[1] Nanyang Technol Univ, Lee Kong Chian Sch Med, Singapore 308232, Singapore
[2] Tan Tock Seng Hosp, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Div Spine, Singapore 308433, Singapore
来源
SURGICAL TECHNIQUES DEVELOPMENT | 2023年 / 12卷 / 04期
关键词
meta-analysis; postoperative complications; spinal fusion; spine; spondylosis; ADJACENT SEGMENT PATHOLOGY; INDIRECT DECOMPRESSION; STENOSIS; OUTCOMES; DLIF; OLIF;
D O I
10.3390/std12040020
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
The main advantage of Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion (OLIF) is its ability to provide safe access to the lumbar spine while being a robust interbody fusion technique through a minimally invasive approach. This study reviews the postoperative complications of OLIF, offering a comprehensive understanding of its advantages and disadvantages. A total of 27 studies with 1275 patients were shortlisted based on our selection criteria. Complications were categorized into intra-operative, immediate post-operative, and delayed post-operative and were interpreted based on surgical procedure into stand-alone OLIF, OLIF with posterior stabilisation, and unspecified. Major complications exhibited a pooled prevalence of just 1.7%, whereas the overall pooled prevalence of complications was 24.7%. Among the subgroups, the stand-alone subgroup had the lowest prevalence of complications (14.6%) compared to the unspecified subgroup (29.6%) and the OLIF L2-5 with posterior stabilisation subgroup (25.8%). Similarly, for major complications, the stand-alone subgroup had the lowest prevalence (1.4%), while the OLIF L2-5 with posterior stabilisation subgroup (1.8%) and the unspecified OLIF L2-5 subgroup (1.6%) had higher rates. However, the differences were not statistically significant. In conclusion, the rate of major complications after OLIF is minimal, making it a safe procedure with significant benefits outweighing the risks. The advantages of OLIF L2-5 with posterior stabilisation over stand-alone OLIF L2-5 is a subject of discussion.
引用
收藏
页码:211 / 223
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Comparison between intervertebral oblique lumbar interbody fusion and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a multicenter study
    Takaoka, Hiromitsu
    Inage, Kazuhide
    Eguchi, Yawara
    Shiga, Yasuhiro
    Furuya, Takeo
    Maki, Satoshi
    Aoki, Yasuchika
    Inoue, Masahiro
    Fujiyoshi, Takayuki
    Miyamoto, Takuya
    Noguchi, Yuji
    Nakamura, Shinichiro
    Kinoshita, Tomoaki
    Kamada, Takahito
    Takahashi, Hiroshi
    Saito, Junya
    Norimoto, Masaki
    Kotani, Toshiaki
    Sakuma, Tsuyoshi
    Iijima, Yasushi
    Ishikawa, Tetsuhiro
    Umimura, Tomotaka
    Ohta, Mitsutoshi
    Suzuki-Narita, Miyako
    Enomoto, Keigo
    Sato, Takashi
    Sato, Masashi
    Suzuki, Masahiro
    Hozumi, Takashi
    Kim, Geundong
    Mizuki, Norichika
    Tsuchiya, Ryuto
    Otagiri, Takuma
    Mukaihata, Tomohito
    Hishiya, Takahisa
    Ohtori, Seiji
    Orita, Sumihisa
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2021, 11 (01)
  • [32] The Navigated Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Accuracy Rate, Effect on Surgical Time, and Complications
    Xi, Zhuo
    Chou, Dean
    Mummaneni, Praveen V.
    Burch, Shane
    NEUROSPINE, 2020, 17 (01) : 260 - 267
  • [33] Minimally invasive anterior, lateral, and oblique lumbar interbody fusion: a literature review
    Xu, David S.
    Walker, Corey T.
    Godzik, Jakub
    Turner, Jay D.
    Smith, William
    Uribe, Juan S.
    ANNALS OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE, 2018, 6 (06)
  • [34] Lateral and Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion—Current Concepts and a Review of Recent Literature
    Raymond Hah
    H. Paco Kang
    Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine, 2019, 12 : 305 - 310
  • [35] Neuromonitoring in Lateral Approaches for Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Systematic Review
    Nie, James W.
    Hartman, Timothy J.
    Zheng, Eileen
    MacGregor, Keith R.
    Oyetayo, Omolabake O.
    Singh, Kern
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2022, 168 : 268 - +
  • [36] Risk Factors of Cage Subsidence Following Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Meta-analysis and Systematic Review
    Shen, Shufeng
    You, Xinmao
    Ren, Yingqing
    Ye, Senqi
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2024, 183 : 180 - 186
  • [37] Lateral lumbar interbody fusion: a systematic review of complication rates
    Hijji, Fady Y.
    Narain, Ankur S.
    Bohl, Daniel D.
    Ahn, Junyoung
    Long, William W.
    DiBattista, Jacob V.
    Kudaravalli, Krishna T.
    Singh, Kern
    SPINE JOURNAL, 2017, 17 (10): : 1412 - 1419
  • [38] Impact of Spinal Navigation on the Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion
    Park, Paul
    NEUROSPINE, 2020, 17 (01) : 268 - 269
  • [39] Complications associated with single-level transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion
    Rihn, Jeffrey A.
    Patel, Ravi
    Makda, Junaid
    Hong, Joseph
    Anderson, David G.
    Vaccaro, Alexander R.
    Hilibrand, Alan S.
    Albert, Todd J.
    SPINE JOURNAL, 2009, 9 (08): : 623 - 629
  • [40] The Research on Spinopelvic Parameters and Clinical Outcomes of Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in the Treatment of
    Yang, Pengchao
    Dong, Yimin
    Xu, Yong
    Kang, Honglei
    Li, Feng
    Guan, Hanfeng
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2024, 190 : E841 - E850