Complications Associated with Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Systematic Review

被引:2
|
作者
Tan, Quan Rui [1 ]
Wong, Russell Andrew [1 ]
Kaliya-Perumal, Arun-Kumar [1 ]
Oh, Jacob Yoong-Leong [2 ]
机构
[1] Nanyang Technol Univ, Lee Kong Chian Sch Med, Singapore 308232, Singapore
[2] Tan Tock Seng Hosp, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Div Spine, Singapore 308433, Singapore
来源
SURGICAL TECHNIQUES DEVELOPMENT | 2023年 / 12卷 / 04期
关键词
meta-analysis; postoperative complications; spinal fusion; spine; spondylosis; ADJACENT SEGMENT PATHOLOGY; INDIRECT DECOMPRESSION; STENOSIS; OUTCOMES; DLIF; OLIF;
D O I
10.3390/std12040020
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
The main advantage of Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion (OLIF) is its ability to provide safe access to the lumbar spine while being a robust interbody fusion technique through a minimally invasive approach. This study reviews the postoperative complications of OLIF, offering a comprehensive understanding of its advantages and disadvantages. A total of 27 studies with 1275 patients were shortlisted based on our selection criteria. Complications were categorized into intra-operative, immediate post-operative, and delayed post-operative and were interpreted based on surgical procedure into stand-alone OLIF, OLIF with posterior stabilisation, and unspecified. Major complications exhibited a pooled prevalence of just 1.7%, whereas the overall pooled prevalence of complications was 24.7%. Among the subgroups, the stand-alone subgroup had the lowest prevalence of complications (14.6%) compared to the unspecified subgroup (29.6%) and the OLIF L2-5 with posterior stabilisation subgroup (25.8%). Similarly, for major complications, the stand-alone subgroup had the lowest prevalence (1.4%), while the OLIF L2-5 with posterior stabilisation subgroup (1.8%) and the unspecified OLIF L2-5 subgroup (1.6%) had higher rates. However, the differences were not statistically significant. In conclusion, the rate of major complications after OLIF is minimal, making it a safe procedure with significant benefits outweighing the risks. The advantages of OLIF L2-5 with posterior stabilisation over stand-alone OLIF L2-5 is a subject of discussion.
引用
收藏
页码:211 / 223
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Review of early clinical results and complications associated with oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF)
    Phan, Kevin
    Maharaj, Monish
    Assem, Yusuf
    Mobbs, Ralph J.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2016, 31 : 23 - 29
  • [2] Clinical results and complications associated with oblique lumbar interbody fusion technique
    Cheng, Cheng
    Wang, Kai
    Zhang, Can
    Wu, Hao
    Jian, Fengzeng
    ANNALS OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE, 2021, 9 (01)
  • [3] Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Utility and Perioperative Complications
    Satyarthee, Guru Dutta
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2017, 102 : 690 - 691
  • [4] In Reply to "Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Utility and Perioperative Complications"
    Phan, Kevin
    Hussain, Awais
    Mobbs, Ralph Jasper
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2017, 102 : 692 - 692
  • [5] Comparison between oblique lumbar interbody fusion and posterior lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of lumbar degenerative diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Bochen An
    Bowen Ren
    Zhenchuan Han
    Keya Mao
    Jianheng Liu
    Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, 18
  • [6] Comparison between oblique lumbar interbody fusion and posterior lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of lumbar degenerative diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    An, Bochen
    Ren, Bowen
    Han, Zhenchuan
    Mao, Keya
    Liu, Jianheng
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND RESEARCH, 2023, 18 (01)
  • [7] Efficacy of oblique lumbar interbody fusion versus transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in the treatment of lumbar degenerative diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Xi-yong Li
    Yun-lu Wang
    Su Yang
    Chang-sheng Liao
    Song-feng Li
    Peng-yong Han
    Peng-fei Han
    Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, 2023, 143 : 5657 - 5670
  • [8] Efficacy of oblique lumbar interbody fusion versus transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in the treatment of lumbar degenerative diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Li, Xi-yong
    Wang, Yun-lu
    Yang, Su
    Liao, Chang-sheng
    Li, Song-feng
    Han, Peng-yong
    Han, Peng-fei
    ARCHIVES OF ORTHOPAEDIC AND TRAUMA SURGERY, 2023, 143 (09) : 5657 - 5670
  • [9] Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (TLIF) versus Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion (OLIF) in Interbody Fusion Technique for Degenerative Spondylolisthesis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Chang, Min Cheol
    Kim, Gang-Un
    Choo, Yoo Jin
    Lee, Gun Woo
    LIFE-BASEL, 2021, 11 (07):
  • [10] Efficacy and Safety of Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion Versus Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Liu, Ai-Feng
    Guo, Tian-Ci
    Chen, Ji-Xin
    Yu, Wei-Jie
    Feng, Hui-Chuan
    Niu, Pu-Yu
    Zhai, Jing-Bo
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2022, 158 : E964 - E974