Life Cycle Assessment and Cost-Benefit Analysis as Combined Economic-Environmental Assessment Tools: Application to an Anaerobic Digestion Plant

被引:4
|
作者
Bruno, Morena [1 ]
Marchi, Michela [1 ]
Ermini, Nicolo [2 ]
Niccolucci, Valentina [1 ]
Pulselli, Federico Maria [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Siena, Dept Phys Sci Earth & Environm, Ecodynam Grp, Piazzetta Enzo Tiezzi 1, I-53100 Siena, Italy
[2] Univ Siena, Dept Econ & Stat, Piazza San Francesco 7-8, I-53100 Siena, Italy
关键词
carbon footprint; cost benefit analysis; economic-environmental assessment; anaerobic digestion; biogas; environmental externality; ELECTRICITY; EMISSIONS; GENERATION; FRAMEWORK; WASTE; POWER;
D O I
10.3390/en16093686
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
In the present study, using Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) and Cost-Benefit Analysis (CBA), we assess the economic-environmental performance of an anaerobic digestion (AD) plant, fed by cultured crops (i.e., maize and wheat), in Italy. The biogas generated by the AD plant is used for the production of electricity, imputed into the Italian energy grid. The LCA evaluated potential greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, measured via Carbon Footprint (CF), while the CBA analysed the financial and economic profiles via the Net Present Value (NPV) and Internal Rate of Return (IRR) indicators. The strength of combining these methodologies is the joint examination of the financial and social-environmental performance of the plant. The results of the CBA are complemented with the GHG emissions avoided by producing electricity from biogas. The CF of 0.28 kg CO(2)eq.kWh(-1) of electricity produced is mainly due to the nitrogen fertilizers involved in the production of the additional feedstock matrix (i.e., maize flour). In the CBA, the negative financial NPV and the financial IRR, which is lower than the discount rate applied, highlight the inability of the net revenue to repay the initial investment. Regarding the social desirability, the economic analysis, enriched by the LCA outcomes, shows a positive economic performance, demonstrating that the combination of information from different methodologies enables wider consideration for the anaerobic digestion plant. In line with the Italian Recovery and Resilience Plan's aim to strongly increase the exploitation of renewable resources, an AD plant fed by dedicated crops could valorise the marginal uncultivated land, obtaining energy without consuming land for food production. Moreover, this AD plant could contribute to the creation of repeatable small-scale energy production systems able to sustain the demand of local communities.
引用
下载
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Anaerobic digestion of lignocellulosic waste: Environmental impact and economic assessment
    Van Fan, Yee
    Klemes, Jiff Jaromir
    Perry, Simon
    Lee, Chew Tin
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2019, 231 : 352 - 363
  • [32] Are Aquavoltaics Investable? A Framework for Economic and Environmental Cost-Benefit Analysis
    Wen, Lihchyi
    Lin, Chun-Hsu
    Lee, Ying-Chiao
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 15 (11)
  • [33] Anaerobic digestion of poultry litter - A consequential life cycle assessment
    Beausang, Ciara
    McDonnell, Kevin
    Murphy, Fionnuala
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2020, 735
  • [34] Life Cycle Incremental Cost-Benefit Analysis of Green Building
    Chen, Min
    Chen, Jianguo
    Cheng, Xinxin
    FRONTIERS OF GREEN BUILDING, MATERIALS AND CIVIL ENGINEERING, PTS 1-8, 2011, 71-78 : 4645 - 4651
  • [35] Environmental and socio-economic assessment of cork waste gasification: Life cycle and cost analysis
    Ramos, Ana
    Berzosa, Joan
    Clarens, Frederic
    Marin, Mario
    Rouboa, Abel
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2020, 249 (249)
  • [36] Assessment of the Programme of Measures for Coastal Lagoon Environmental Restoration Using Cost-Benefit Analysis
    Martinez-Paz, Jose M.
    Perni, Angel
    Martinez-Carrasco, Federico
    EUROPEAN PLANNING STUDIES, 2013, 21 (02) : 131 - 148
  • [37] Restoring reason to regulation: Applying scientific assessment and cost-benefit analysis to environmental law
    Kenkeremath, N
    AMERICAN INDUSTRIAL HYGIENE ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 1996, 57 (09): : 791 - 793
  • [38] Life cycle assessment of the environmental impacts and energy efficiency of an integration of sludge anaerobic digestion and pyrolysis
    Li, Huan
    Feng, Kai
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2018, 195 : 476 - 485
  • [39] Life cycle assessment of a small-scale anaerobic digestion plant from cattle waste
    Mezzullo, William G.
    McManus, Marcelle C.
    Hammond, Geoff P.
    APPLIED ENERGY, 2013, 102 : 657 - 664
  • [40] Comparative environmental and economic life cycle assessment of high solids anaerobic co-digestion for biosolids and organic waste management
    Lee, Eunyoung
    Oliveira, Deborah Stolte Bezerra Lisboa
    Oliveira, Luiza Stolte Bezerra Lisboa
    Jimenez, Eduardo
    Kim, Youngwoon
    Wang, Meng
    Ergas, Sarina J.
    Zhang, Qiong
    WATER RESEARCH, 2020, 171 (171)