Comparative environmental and economic life cycle assessment of high solids anaerobic co-digestion for biosolids and organic waste management

被引:63
|
作者
Lee, Eunyoung [1 ]
Oliveira, Deborah Stolte Bezerra Lisboa [2 ]
Oliveira, Luiza Stolte Bezerra Lisboa [2 ]
Jimenez, Eduardo [1 ,3 ]
Kim, Youngwoon [1 ]
Wang, Meng [1 ,4 ]
Ergas, Sarina J. [1 ]
Zhang, Qiong [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ S Florida, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, 4202 E Fowler Ave,ENG 030, Tampa, FL 33620 USA
[2] Univ S Florida, Dept Chem & Biomed Engn, 4202 E Fowler Ave,ENB 118, Tampa, FL 33620 USA
[3] Kimley Horn & Associates INC, 655 N Franklin St 150, Tampa, FL 33602 USA
[4] Penn State Univ, Dept Energy & Mineral Engn, 113 Hosier Bldg, State Coll, PA 16802 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Life cycle assessment; Life cycle cost analysis; Biosolids; Organic fraction of municipal solid waste; High solids anaerobic co-digestion; MUNICIPAL FOOD WASTE; SEWAGE-SLUDGE; BIOGAS PRODUCTION; ENERGY RECOVERY; WATER; EMISSIONS; DIESEL; RATIO;
D O I
10.1016/j.watres.2019.115443
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
High-Solids Anaerobic co-Digestion (HS-AcD) of sewage sludge (biosolids) with the organic fraction of municipal solid waste is a promising waste management alternative due to high methane yields, lower reactor volume requirements, lower energy inputs, and less leachate production than liquid anaerobic digestion. This study evaluated the environmental and economic burdens and benefits of HS-AcD of biosolids, Food Waste (FW), and Yard Waste (YW) using Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) and Life Cycle Cost Analysis (LCCA) methods using Hillsborough County, Florida in the U.S. as a case study. Results for HS-AcD were compared with incineration, composting, and landfilling, with and without landfill gas use. The results showed that HS-AcD of a mixture of biosolids, FW, and YW had the lowest environmental impacts in all categories analyzed (global warming potential, acidification, eutrophication, and ecotoxicity). In terms of economics, HS-AcD had the lowest life cycle cost, with or without considering land acquisition. The results show that HS-AcD is the best choice to manage biosolids and the organic waste in Hillsborough County in terms of both environmental and economic sustainability. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparative life cycle assessment of anaerobic co-digestion for dairy waste management in large-scale farms
    Adghim, Mohamad
    Abdallah, Mohamed
    Saad, Suhair
    Shanableh, Abdallah
    Sartaj, Majid
    El Mansouri, Ahmed Eltigani
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2020, 256 (256)
  • [2] Anaerobic co-digestion of municipal food waste and sewage sludge: A comparative life cycle assessment in the context of a waste service provision
    Edwards, Joel
    Othman, Maazuza
    Crossin, Enda
    Burn, Stewart
    [J]. BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2017, 223 : 237 - 249
  • [3] Anaerobic co-digestion of biosolids and organic fraction of municipal solid waste by sequencing batch process
    Zhang, Panyue
    Zeng, Guangming
    Zhang, Guangming
    Li, Yin
    Zhang, Bibo
    Fan, Maohong
    [J]. FUEL PROCESSING TECHNOLOGY, 2008, 89 (04) : 485 - 489
  • [4] A comparative life cycle assessment of anaerobic mono- and co-digestion of livestock manure in Bangladesh
    Hossain, Samira
    Akter, Shammi
    Saha, Chayan Kumer
    Reza, Toufiq
    Kabir, Kazi Bayzid
    Kirtania, Kawnish
    [J]. WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2023, 157 : 100 - 109
  • [5] Effects of management and co-digestion on life cycle emissions and energy from anaerobic digestion
    Aguirre-Villegas, Horacio A.
    Larson, Rebecca
    Reinemann, Douglas J.
    [J]. GREENHOUSE GASES-SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2015, 5 (05): : 603 - 621
  • [6] Co-digestion of waste organic solids: batch studies
    Callaghan, FJ
    Wase, DAJ
    Thayanithy, K
    Forster, CF
    [J]. BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 1999, 67 (02) : 117 - 122
  • [7] Comparative environmental and economic life cycle assessment of dry and wet anaerobic digestion for treating food waste and biogas digestate
    Xiao, Huaping
    Zhang, Dongqing
    Tang, Zhihua
    Li, Kai
    Guo, Huafang
    Niu, Xiaojun
    Yi, Linzi
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2022, 338
  • [8] Comparison of high-solids to liquid anaerobic co-digestion of food waste and green waste
    Chen, Xiang
    Yan, Wei
    Sheng, Kuichuan
    Sanati, Mehri
    [J]. BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2014, 154 : 215 - 221
  • [9] A comparative life cycle assessment on mono- and co-digestion of food waste and sewage sludge
    Tong, Huanhuan
    Tong, Yen-Wah
    Peng, Ying Hong
    [J]. INNOVATIVE SOLUTIONS FOR ENERGY TRANSITIONS, 2019, 158 : 4166 - 4171
  • [10] Enhancing hydrogen production through anaerobic co-digestion of fruit waste with biosolids
    Sethupathy, Anbazhagan
    Arun, Chelliah
    Teja, Galavila Ravi
    Sivashanmugam, Palani
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND HEALTH PART A-TOXIC/HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES & ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, 2019, 54 (06): : 553 - 559