Evaluating the Effects of Precipitation and Evapotranspiration on Soil Moisture Variability Within CMIP5 Using SMAP and ERA5 Data

被引:2
|
作者
Xi, Xuan [1 ]
Zhuang, Qianlai [1 ,2 ]
Kim, Seungbum [3 ]
Gentine, Pierre [4 ]
机构
[1] Purdue Univ, Dept Earth Atmospher & Planetary Sci, W Lafayette, IN USA
[2] Purdue Univ, Dept Agron, W Lafayette, IN 47907 USA
[3] NASA Jet Prop Lab, Pasadena, CA USA
[4] Columbia Univ, Dept Earth Environm Engn, New York, NY USA
关键词
soil moisture; precipitation; evapotranspiration; earth system models; Fourier transform; LAND-ATMOSPHERE INTERACTIONS; TERRESTRIAL; VALIDATION; MEMORY; WATER;
D O I
10.1029/2022WR034225
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The effects of precipitation (Pr) and evapotranspiration (ET) on surface soil moisture (SSM) play an essential role in the land-atmosphere system. Here we evaluate multimodel differences of these effects within the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 5 (CMIP5) compared to Soil Moisture Active Passive (SMAP) products and ECMWF Reanalysis v5 (ERA5) as references in a frequency domain. The variability of SSM, Pr, and ET within three frequency bands (1/7 similar to 1/30 days(-1), 1/30 similar to 1/90 days(-1), and 1/90 similar to 1/365 days(-1)) after normalization is quantified using Fourier transform. We analyze the impact of ET and Pr on SSM variability based on a transfer function assuming that these variables form a linear time-invariant (LTI) system. For the total effects of ET and Pr on SSM variability, the CMIP5 estimations are smaller than the reference data in the two higher frequency bands and are larger than the reference data in the lowest frequency band. Besides, the effects on SSM by Pr and ET are found to be different across the three frequency bands. In each frequency band, the variability of the factor that dominates SSM (i.e., Pr or ET) from CMIP5 is smaller than that from the references. This study identifies the spatiotemporal distribution of differences between CMIP5 models and references (SMAP and ERA5) in simulating ET and Pr effects on SSM within three frequency bands. This study provides insightful information on how soil moisture variability is affected by varying precipitation and evapotranspiration at different time scales within Earth System Models. Plain Language Summary Climate is influenced by the interactions between the land surface and atmosphere boundary, and soil moisture is a key component of these physical processes. Precipitation and evapotranspiration, as two major variables involved in these interactions, have been largely regarded as essential processes affecting soil moisture dynamics. However, Earth System Models have large uncertainties in simulating these effects. This study compares the average performance of 14 Earth System Models in capturing the effects of precipitation and evapotranspiration on surface soil moisture variability. We find that (a) soil moisture is mainly affected by precipitation at weekly to seasonal time scales and by evapotranspiration at seasonal to annual time scales; (b) compared to two largely used reference data, the total effects of precipitation and evapotranspiration on soil moisture is smaller at weekly to seasonal time scales and are larger at seasonal to annual time scale; and (c) spatially, models tend to simulate less variability of precipitation or evapotranspiration as a major control on surface soil moisture.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Circulation, Moisture, and Precipitation Relationships along the South Pacific Convergence Zone in Reanalyses and CMIP5 Models
    Niznik, Matthew J.
    Lintner, Benjamin R.
    JOURNAL OF CLIMATE, 2013, 26 (24) : 10174 - 10192
  • [32] Assessment of ERA5-Land Volumetric Soil Water Layer Product Using In Situ and SMAP Soil Moisture Observations
    Lal, Preet
    Singh, Gurjeet
    Das, Narendra N.
    Colliander, Andreas
    Entekhabi, Dara
    IEEE GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING LETTERS, 2022, 19
  • [33] Evaluation of ERA5 and NCEP reanalysis climate models for precipitation and soil moisture over a semi-arid area in Kuwait
    Kokkalis, Panagiotis
    Al Jassar, Hala K.
    Al Sarraf, Hussain
    Nair, Roshni
    Al Hendi, Hamad
    CLIMATE DYNAMICS, 2024, 62 (06) : 4893 - 4904
  • [34] Variability of hourly precipitation during the warm season over eastern China using gauge observations and ERA5
    Qin, Shun
    Wang, Kaicun
    Wu, Guocan
    Ma, Zhanshan
    ATMOSPHERIC RESEARCH, 2021, 264
  • [35] Evaluation of ERA5, ERA5-Land, GLDAS-2.1, and GLEAM potential evapotranspiration data over mainland China
    Xu, Chao
    Wang, Wen
    Hu, Yanjun
    Liu, Yongwei
    JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY-REGIONAL STUDIES, 2024, 51
  • [36] A Temperature Refinement Method Using the ERA5 Reanalysis Data
    Li, Zhicai
    Gong, Xu
    Liu, Mingjia
    Tang, Hui
    Yao, Yifan
    Liu, Mengfan
    Yang, Fei
    ATMOSPHERE, 2022, 13 (10)
  • [37] Evaluating long-term trends in annual precipitation: A temporal consistency analysis of ERA5 data in the Alps and Italy
    Lussana, Cristian
    Cavalleri, Francesco
    Brunetti, Michele
    Manara, Veronica
    Maugeri, Maurizio
    ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCE LETTERS, 2024,
  • [38] Drivers of low-frequency Sahel precipitation variability: comparing CMIP5 and CMIP6 ensemble means with observations
    Rebecca Jean Herman
    Michela Biasutti
    Yochanan Kushnir
    Climate Dynamics, 2023, 61 : 4449 - 4470
  • [39] Changes in extreme precipitation over Spain using statistical downscaling of CMIP5 projections
    Monjo, Robert
    Gaitan, Emma
    Portoles, Javier
    Ribalaygua, Jaime
    Torres, Luis
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLIMATOLOGY, 2016, 36 (02) : 757 - 769
  • [40] An intercomparison of CMIP5 and CMIP3 models for interannual variability of summer precipitation in Pan-Asian monsoon region
    Gao, Ya
    Wang, Huijun
    Jiang, Dabang
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLIMATOLOGY, 2015, 35 (13) : 3770 - 3780