Evaluating the Effects of Precipitation and Evapotranspiration on Soil Moisture Variability Within CMIP5 Using SMAP and ERA5 Data

被引:2
|
作者
Xi, Xuan [1 ]
Zhuang, Qianlai [1 ,2 ]
Kim, Seungbum [3 ]
Gentine, Pierre [4 ]
机构
[1] Purdue Univ, Dept Earth Atmospher & Planetary Sci, W Lafayette, IN USA
[2] Purdue Univ, Dept Agron, W Lafayette, IN 47907 USA
[3] NASA Jet Prop Lab, Pasadena, CA USA
[4] Columbia Univ, Dept Earth Environm Engn, New York, NY USA
关键词
soil moisture; precipitation; evapotranspiration; earth system models; Fourier transform; LAND-ATMOSPHERE INTERACTIONS; TERRESTRIAL; VALIDATION; MEMORY; WATER;
D O I
10.1029/2022WR034225
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The effects of precipitation (Pr) and evapotranspiration (ET) on surface soil moisture (SSM) play an essential role in the land-atmosphere system. Here we evaluate multimodel differences of these effects within the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 5 (CMIP5) compared to Soil Moisture Active Passive (SMAP) products and ECMWF Reanalysis v5 (ERA5) as references in a frequency domain. The variability of SSM, Pr, and ET within three frequency bands (1/7 similar to 1/30 days(-1), 1/30 similar to 1/90 days(-1), and 1/90 similar to 1/365 days(-1)) after normalization is quantified using Fourier transform. We analyze the impact of ET and Pr on SSM variability based on a transfer function assuming that these variables form a linear time-invariant (LTI) system. For the total effects of ET and Pr on SSM variability, the CMIP5 estimations are smaller than the reference data in the two higher frequency bands and are larger than the reference data in the lowest frequency band. Besides, the effects on SSM by Pr and ET are found to be different across the three frequency bands. In each frequency band, the variability of the factor that dominates SSM (i.e., Pr or ET) from CMIP5 is smaller than that from the references. This study identifies the spatiotemporal distribution of differences between CMIP5 models and references (SMAP and ERA5) in simulating ET and Pr effects on SSM within three frequency bands. This study provides insightful information on how soil moisture variability is affected by varying precipitation and evapotranspiration at different time scales within Earth System Models. Plain Language Summary Climate is influenced by the interactions between the land surface and atmosphere boundary, and soil moisture is a key component of these physical processes. Precipitation and evapotranspiration, as two major variables involved in these interactions, have been largely regarded as essential processes affecting soil moisture dynamics. However, Earth System Models have large uncertainties in simulating these effects. This study compares the average performance of 14 Earth System Models in capturing the effects of precipitation and evapotranspiration on surface soil moisture variability. We find that (a) soil moisture is mainly affected by precipitation at weekly to seasonal time scales and by evapotranspiration at seasonal to annual time scales; (b) compared to two largely used reference data, the total effects of precipitation and evapotranspiration on soil moisture is smaller at weekly to seasonal time scales and are larger at seasonal to annual time scale; and (c) spatially, models tend to simulate less variability of precipitation or evapotranspiration as a major control on surface soil moisture.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Evaluating the Reliability of Air Temperature From ERA5 Reanalysis Data
    McNicholl, Barry
    Lee, Yee Hui
    Campbell, Abraham G.
    Dev, Soumyabrata
    IEEE GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING LETTERS, 2022, 19
  • [22] A comparison of CMIP6 and CMIP5 projections for precipitation to observational data: the case of Northeastern Iran
    Zamani, Yasin
    Hashemi Monfared, Seyed Arman
    Azhdari Moghaddam, Mehdi
    Hamidianpour, Mohsen
    THEORETICAL AND APPLIED CLIMATOLOGY, 2020, 142 (3-4) : 1613 - 1623
  • [23] Evaluation of soil moisture in CMIP5 simulations over the contiguous United States using in situ and satellite observations
    Yuan, Shanshui
    Quiring, Steven M.
    HYDROLOGY AND EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCES, 2017, 21 (04) : 2203 - 2218
  • [24] Comparative Assessment and Future Prediction Using CMIP6 and CMIP5 for Annual Precipitation and Extreme Precipitation Simulation
    Li, Jingjing
    Huo, Ran
    Chen, Hua
    Zhao, Ying
    Zhao, Tianhui
    FRONTIERS IN EARTH SCIENCE, 2021, 9
  • [25] Downscaling Extreme Precipitation from CMIP5 Simulations Using Historical Analogs
    Castellano, Christopher M.
    Degaetano, Arthur T.
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED METEOROLOGY AND CLIMATOLOGY, 2017, 56 (09) : 2421 - 2439
  • [26] Seasonal and regional variations in extreme precipitation event frequency using CMIP5
    Janssen, E.
    Sriver, R. L.
    Wuebbles, D. J.
    Kunkel, K. E.
    GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2016, 43 (10) : 5385 - 5393
  • [27] Precipitation over Northern South America and Its Seasonal Variability as Simulated by the CMIP5 Models
    Sierra, Juan P.
    Arias, Paola A.
    Vieira, Sara C.
    ADVANCES IN METEOROLOGY, 2015, 2015
  • [28] Evaluating precipitation distributions at regional scales: a benchmarking framework and application to CMIP5 and 6 models
    Ahn, Min-Seop
    Ullrich, Paul A.
    Gleckler, Peter J.
    Lee, Jiwoo
    Ordonez, Ana C.
    Pendergrass, Angeline G.
    GEOSCIENTIFIC MODEL DEVELOPMENT, 2023, 16 (13) : 3927 - 3951
  • [29] Inter-model variability of the CMIP5 future projection of Baiu, Meiyu, and Changma precipitation
    Takeshi Horinouchi
    Yoshio Kawatani
    Naoki Sato
    Climate Dynamics, 2023, 60 : 1849 - 1864
  • [30] Inter-model variability of the CMIP5 future projection of Baiu, Meiyu, and Changma precipitation
    Horinouchi, Takeshi
    Kawatani, Yoshio
    Sato, Naoki
    CLIMATE DYNAMICS, 2023, 60 (5-6) : 1849 - 1864