Surgery with adjuvant or neoadjuvant treatment vs surgery alone for resectable pancreatic cancer: A network meta-analysis

被引:1
|
作者
Pu Shen [1 ]
Kai-Jun Huang [2 ]
Chuan-Zhao Zhang [2 ]
Li Xiao [1 ]
Tao Zhang [1 ]
机构
[1] Department of Anesthesia, the First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yatsen University
[2] Department of General Surgery, Guangdong Provincial People’s Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences
关键词
Pancreatic cancer; Surgery; Network meta-analysis; Adjuvant therapy; Neoadjuvant therapy;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R735.9 [胰腺肿瘤];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND Pancreatic cancer is one of the most common and lethal malignancies worldwide.The common treatment options for resectable pancreatic cancer include surgery alone, neoadjuvant chemotherapy(CT), neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy(CRT),adjuvant CT, and adjuvant CRT. However, the optimal treatment is still controversial.AIM To identify the most effective approach for pancreatic cancer using network meta-analysis.METHODS Eligible studies were searched from Pub Med, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane database, and Google scholar. We searched and included randomized controlled trials reporting on neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapies. For direct comparisons,standard pairwise meta-analysis was performed using the inverse variance Der Simonian-Laird random-effects model. For indirect comparisons, Bayesian network meta-analysis was used to combine direct and indirect evidence. We used relative hazard ratios(HRs) to estimate death difference of different treatments, and relative odds ratios(ORs) for toxic effects. Treatment effects were ranked based on their efficacy for improving survival or reducing toxicity using rankogram. The quality of evidence of estimates from direct comparison and network meta-analysis was evaluated following the GRADE approach.RESULTS We included 13 high quality trials with 1591 participants in this network metaanalysis. Compared with surgery alone [pooled HR = 0.7, 95% confidenceinterval(CI): 0.62-0.79] and surgery with adjuvant CRT(pooled HR = 0.6, 95%CI:0.54-0.72), surgery with adjuvant CT had a higher rate of overall survival. In contrast, standard pairwise meta-analysis showed a statistically significant survival advantage of surgery with adjuvant CT compared with surgery alone(pooled HR = 0.75, 95%CI: 0.63-0.89; P < 0.001). Rankogram showed that surgery with adjuvant CT was most likely to rank the best in terms of overall survival(probability: 94.2%), followed by surgery alone(probability: 5.8%). No significant differences in overall toxicity or haematological toxicity were found between all the therapies. High quality evidence supported surgery with adjuvant CT over surgery alone for increasing overall survival. Moderate quality evidence supported surgery with adjuvant CT over surgery with adjuvant CRT for increasing overall survival.CONCLUSION Surgery with adjuvant CT prolongs overall survival compared with surgery alone and surgery with adjuvant CRT, suggesting surgery with adjuvant CT is the optimal treatment for resectable pancreatic cancer.
引用
收藏
页码:309 / 322
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Neoadjuvant chemotherapy and surgery versus surgery alone in resectable esophageal cancer
    Bushan, K.
    Sharma, S.
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2015, 52 (03) : 413 - 416
  • [32] A systematic review and meta-analysis of adjuvant chemotherapy after neoadjuvant treatment and surgery for rectal cancer
    Petrelli, Fausto
    Coinu, Andrea
    Lonati, Veronica
    Barni, Sandro
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2015, 30 (04) : 447 - 457
  • [33] A systematic review and meta-analysis of adjuvant chemotherapy after neoadjuvant treatment and surgery for rectal cancer
    Fausto Petrelli
    Andrea Coinu
    Veronica Lonati
    Sandro Barni
    International Journal of Colorectal Disease, 2015, 30 : 447 - 457
  • [34] Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy versus immediate surgery for resectable and borderline resectable pancreatic cancer : Meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Hajibandeh, Shahab
    Hajibandeh, Shahin
    Intrator, Christina
    Hassan, Karim
    Sehmbhi, Mantej
    Shah, Jigar
    Mazumdar, Eshan
    Kausar, Ambareen
    Satyadas, Thomas
    ANNALS OF HEPATO-BILIARY-PANCREATIC SURGERY, 2023, 27 (01) : 28 - 39
  • [35] Effect of time to surgery in resectable pancreatic cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Philip C. Müller
    James Hodson
    Christoph Kuemmerli
    Marit Kalisvaart
    Rupaly Pande
    Keith J. Roberts
    Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery, 2020, 405 : 293 - 302
  • [36] Effect of time to surgery in resectable pancreatic cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Muller, Philip C.
    Hodson, James
    Kuemmerli, Christoph
    Kalisvaart, Marit
    Pande, Rupaly
    Roberts, Keith J.
    LANGENBECKS ARCHIVES OF SURGERY, 2020, 405 (03) : 293 - 302
  • [37] Comparing upfront surgery with neoadjuvant treatments in patients with resectable, borderline resectable or locally advanced pancreatic cancer: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials
    He, Jiaxin
    Lv, Na
    Yang, Zhenyi
    Luo, Yixuan
    Zhong, Wen
    Wu, Chunli
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2024, 110 (06) : 3900 - 3909
  • [38] Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) versus immediate surgery for resectable and borderline resectable pancreatic cancer: meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis of randomised controlled trials
    Latif, Sadia
    Hajibandeh, Shahin
    Satyadas, Thomas
    Hajibandeh, Shahab
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2022, 109
  • [39] Neoadjuvant treatments for resectable rectal cancer: A network meta-analysis
    Zhong, Wei
    Xue, Xiaojun
    Dai, Lianzhi
    Li, Ranran
    Nie, Kai
    Zhou, Song
    EXPERIMENTAL AND THERAPEUTIC MEDICINE, 2020, 19 (04) : 2604 - 2614
  • [40] Neoadjuvant Treatment Versus Upfront Surgery in Resectable Pancreatic Cancer: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis
    Arjani, Simran
    Prasath, Vishnu
    Suri, Nipun
    Li, Sharon
    Ahlawat, Sushil
    Chokshi, Ravi J.
    JCO ONCOLOGY PRACTICE, 2023, 19 (03) : 148 - +