Surgery with adjuvant or neoadjuvant treatment vs surgery alone for resectable pancreatic cancer: A network meta-analysis

被引:1
|
作者
Pu Shen [1 ]
Kai-Jun Huang [2 ]
Chuan-Zhao Zhang [2 ]
Li Xiao [1 ]
Tao Zhang [1 ]
机构
[1] Department of Anesthesia, the First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yatsen University
[2] Department of General Surgery, Guangdong Provincial People’s Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences
关键词
Pancreatic cancer; Surgery; Network meta-analysis; Adjuvant therapy; Neoadjuvant therapy;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R735.9 [胰腺肿瘤];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND Pancreatic cancer is one of the most common and lethal malignancies worldwide.The common treatment options for resectable pancreatic cancer include surgery alone, neoadjuvant chemotherapy(CT), neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy(CRT),adjuvant CT, and adjuvant CRT. However, the optimal treatment is still controversial.AIM To identify the most effective approach for pancreatic cancer using network meta-analysis.METHODS Eligible studies were searched from Pub Med, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane database, and Google scholar. We searched and included randomized controlled trials reporting on neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapies. For direct comparisons,standard pairwise meta-analysis was performed using the inverse variance Der Simonian-Laird random-effects model. For indirect comparisons, Bayesian network meta-analysis was used to combine direct and indirect evidence. We used relative hazard ratios(HRs) to estimate death difference of different treatments, and relative odds ratios(ORs) for toxic effects. Treatment effects were ranked based on their efficacy for improving survival or reducing toxicity using rankogram. The quality of evidence of estimates from direct comparison and network meta-analysis was evaluated following the GRADE approach.RESULTS We included 13 high quality trials with 1591 participants in this network metaanalysis. Compared with surgery alone [pooled HR = 0.7, 95% confidenceinterval(CI): 0.62-0.79] and surgery with adjuvant CRT(pooled HR = 0.6, 95%CI:0.54-0.72), surgery with adjuvant CT had a higher rate of overall survival. In contrast, standard pairwise meta-analysis showed a statistically significant survival advantage of surgery with adjuvant CT compared with surgery alone(pooled HR = 0.75, 95%CI: 0.63-0.89; P < 0.001). Rankogram showed that surgery with adjuvant CT was most likely to rank the best in terms of overall survival(probability: 94.2%), followed by surgery alone(probability: 5.8%). No significant differences in overall toxicity or haematological toxicity were found between all the therapies. High quality evidence supported surgery with adjuvant CT over surgery alone for increasing overall survival. Moderate quality evidence supported surgery with adjuvant CT over surgery with adjuvant CRT for increasing overall survival.CONCLUSION Surgery with adjuvant CT prolongs overall survival compared with surgery alone and surgery with adjuvant CRT, suggesting surgery with adjuvant CT is the optimal treatment for resectable pancreatic cancer.
引用
收藏
页码:309 / 322
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Comparison of neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery vs. surgery alone for locally advanced gastric cancer: a meta-analysis
    Yu, Jian-Hong
    Wang, Zao-Zao
    Fan, Ying-Chong
    Liu, Mao-Xing
    Xu, Kai
    Zhang, Nan
    Yao, Zhen-Dan
    Yang, Hong
    Zhang, Cheng-Hai
    Xing, Jia-Di
    Cui, Ming
    Su, Xiang-Qian
    CHINESE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2021, 134 (14) : 1669 - 1680
  • [22] Comparison of neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery vs. surgery alone for locally advanced gastric cancer: a meta-analysis
    Yu Jian-Hong
    Wang Zao-Zao
    Fan Ying-Chong
    Liu Mao-Xing
    Xu Kai
    Zhang Nan
    Yao Zhen-Dan
    Yang Hong
    Zhang Cheng-Hai
    Xing Jia-Di
    Cui Ming
    Su Xiang-Qian
    中华医学杂志英文版, 2021, 134 (14) : 1669 - 1680
  • [23] The Role of Neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX in Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Cancer: A Network Meta-Analysis
    Fausto Petrelli
    Michele Ghidini
    Marina Macchini
    Giulia Orsi
    Umberto Peretti
    Sozzi Andrea
    Stefano Cascinu
    Michele Reni
    Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer, 2023, 54 : 1376 - 1379
  • [24] Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy Followed by Surgery versus Surgery Alone for Resectable Pancreatic Carcinoma
    Huang, Lei
    AMERICAN SURGEON, 2018, 84 (12) : E567 - E574
  • [25] Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis of Upfront Surgery versus Neoadjuvant Therapy for Potentially Resectable Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma
    Bradley, Alison
    Van der Meer, Robert
    McKay, Colin
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2021, 108 : 61 - 61
  • [26] ADJUVANT SYSTEMIC TREATMENT FOR RENAL CANCER AFTER SURGERY: A NETWORK META-ANALYSIS
    Sathianathen, Niranjan
    Furrer, Marc
    Murphy, Declan
    Weight, Christopher
    Gupta, Shilpa
    Lawrentschuk, Nathan
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2022, 207 (05): : E175 - E175
  • [27] Network meta-analysis comparing neoadjuvant chemoradiation, neoadjuvant chemotherapy and upfront surgery in patients with resectable, borderline resectable, and locally advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma
    Hu, Qiancheng
    Wang, Dan
    Chen, Ye
    Li, Xiaofen
    Cao, Peng
    Cao, Dan
    RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2019, 14 (1)
  • [28] Neoadjuvant treatment potentially improves outcome in resectable pancreatic cancer: meta-analysis
    Versteijne, E.
    Vogel, J. A.
    Besselink, M. G.
    Busch, O. R.
    Wilmink, J. W.
    Daams, J. G.
    Van Eijck, C. H.
    Koerkamp, B. Groot
    Rasch, C. R.
    Van Tienhoven, G.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2019, 133 : S408 - S409
  • [29] Breast cancer neoadjuvant vs adjuvant treatment modalities: a meta-analysis
    Mauri, Davide
    Pavlidis, Nicholas
    Ioannidis, John
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2004, 15 : 56 - 56
  • [30] Network meta-analysis comparing neoadjuvant chemoradiation, neoadjuvant chemotherapy and upfront surgery in patients with resectable, borderline resectable, and locally advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma
    Qiancheng Hu
    Dan Wang
    Ye Chen
    Xiaofen Li
    Peng Cao
    Dan Cao
    Radiation Oncology, 14