Surgery with adjuvant or neoadjuvant treatment vs surgery alone for resectable pancreatic cancer: A network meta-analysis

被引:1
|
作者
Pu Shen [1 ]
Kai-Jun Huang [2 ]
Chuan-Zhao Zhang [2 ]
Li Xiao [1 ]
Tao Zhang [1 ]
机构
[1] Department of Anesthesia, the First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yatsen University
[2] Department of General Surgery, Guangdong Provincial People’s Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences
关键词
Pancreatic cancer; Surgery; Network meta-analysis; Adjuvant therapy; Neoadjuvant therapy;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R735.9 [胰腺肿瘤];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND Pancreatic cancer is one of the most common and lethal malignancies worldwide.The common treatment options for resectable pancreatic cancer include surgery alone, neoadjuvant chemotherapy(CT), neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy(CRT),adjuvant CT, and adjuvant CRT. However, the optimal treatment is still controversial.AIM To identify the most effective approach for pancreatic cancer using network meta-analysis.METHODS Eligible studies were searched from Pub Med, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane database, and Google scholar. We searched and included randomized controlled trials reporting on neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapies. For direct comparisons,standard pairwise meta-analysis was performed using the inverse variance Der Simonian-Laird random-effects model. For indirect comparisons, Bayesian network meta-analysis was used to combine direct and indirect evidence. We used relative hazard ratios(HRs) to estimate death difference of different treatments, and relative odds ratios(ORs) for toxic effects. Treatment effects were ranked based on their efficacy for improving survival or reducing toxicity using rankogram. The quality of evidence of estimates from direct comparison and network meta-analysis was evaluated following the GRADE approach.RESULTS We included 13 high quality trials with 1591 participants in this network metaanalysis. Compared with surgery alone [pooled HR = 0.7, 95% confidenceinterval(CI): 0.62-0.79] and surgery with adjuvant CRT(pooled HR = 0.6, 95%CI:0.54-0.72), surgery with adjuvant CT had a higher rate of overall survival. In contrast, standard pairwise meta-analysis showed a statistically significant survival advantage of surgery with adjuvant CT compared with surgery alone(pooled HR = 0.75, 95%CI: 0.63-0.89; P < 0.001). Rankogram showed that surgery with adjuvant CT was most likely to rank the best in terms of overall survival(probability: 94.2%), followed by surgery alone(probability: 5.8%). No significant differences in overall toxicity or haematological toxicity were found between all the therapies. High quality evidence supported surgery with adjuvant CT over surgery alone for increasing overall survival. Moderate quality evidence supported surgery with adjuvant CT over surgery with adjuvant CRT for increasing overall survival.CONCLUSION Surgery with adjuvant CT prolongs overall survival compared with surgery alone and surgery with adjuvant CRT, suggesting surgery with adjuvant CT is the optimal treatment for resectable pancreatic cancer.
引用
收藏
页码:309 / 322
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Neoadjuvant Treatment and Surgery vs Immediate Surgery in Resectable Pancreatic Cancer
    Ielpo, Benedetto
    Duran, Hipolito
    Diaz, Eduardo
    Fabra, Isabel
    Caruso, Riccardo R. C.
    Malave, Luis
    Plaza, Carlos
    Cubillo, Antonio
    Quijano, Yolanda
    Vicente, Emilio
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2016, 223 (04) : E47 - E47
  • [2] Meta-analysis comparing upfront surgery with neoadjuvant treatment in patients with resectable or borderline resectable pancreatic cancer
    Versteijne, E.
    Vogel, J. A.
    Besselink, M. G.
    Busch, O. R. C.
    Wilmink, J. W.
    Daams, J. G.
    van Eijck, C. H. J.
    Koerkamp, B. Groot
    Rasch, C. R. N.
    van Tienhoven, G.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2018, 105 (08) : 946 - 958
  • [3] Survival After Neoadjuvant and Adjuvant Treatments Compared to Surgery Alone for Resectable Esophageal Carcinoma A Network Meta-analysis
    Pasquali, Sandro
    Yim, Guang
    Vohra, Ravinder S.
    Mocellin, Simone
    Nyanhongo, Donald
    Marriott, Paul
    Geh, Ju Ian
    Griffiths, Ewen A.
    ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2017, 265 (03) : 481 - 491
  • [4] Neoadjuvant therapy vs. upfront surgery for resectable pancreatic cancer: An update on a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Xu, Youyao
    Chen, Yizhen
    Han, Fang
    Wu, Jia
    Zhang, Yuhua
    BIOSCIENCE TRENDS, 2021, 15 (06) : 365 - 373
  • [5] A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials that compared neoadjuvant chemoradiation and surgery to surgery alone for resectable esophageal cancer
    Urschel, JD
    Vasan, H
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2003, 185 (06): : 538 - 543
  • [6] A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials that compared neoadjuvant chemotherapy and surgery to surgery alone for resectable esophageal cancer
    Urschel, JD
    Vasan, H
    Blewett, CJ
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2002, 183 (03): : 274 - 279
  • [7] Upfront Surgery versus Neoadjuvant Therapy for Resectable Pancreatic Cancer: Systematic Review and Bayesian Network Meta-analysis
    Bradley, Alison
    Van Der Meer, Robert
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2019, 9 (1)
  • [8] Upfront Surgery versus Neoadjuvant Therapy for Resectable Pancreatic Cancer: Systematic Review and Bayesian Network Meta-analysis
    Alison Bradley
    Robert Van Der Meer
    Scientific Reports, 9
  • [9] Neoadjuvant and Adjuvant Treatments for Resectable Esophageal Cancer: A Network Meta-Analysis
    Yuan, M.
    Bao, Y.
    Ma, Z.
    Wang, Y.
    Men, Y.
    Kang, J.
    Sun, X.
    Zhao, M.
    Yang, X.
    Sun, S.
    Hui, Z.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2020, 108 (03): : E651 - E652
  • [10] Neoadjuvant Treatment versus Upfront Surgery for Primary Resectable Pancreatic Cancer: An Update Meta-Analysis of Comparative Studies
    Roesel, R.
    Cristaudi, A.
    Deantonio, L.
    de Dosso, S.
    Berneardi, L.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2023, 110 (SUPP 5)